Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55... 144
It happens when the picture is the same.
Yeah. But it's ... http://www.naturefg.com/pages/c-animals/rebelia.htm
It is written that the corpse. However, shoot as netrupik - it is a clean sport.
Who says what?
Why no. Yes, and the people, let the letter E Especially do not get carried away. It is necessary only where possible ambiguous as it is read.
Corrected.
Zoran posted today, waiting for clarification.
Corrected.
The directory Sineva 2008 this kind of mistake is designated as Lithostege onkhoica.
Alexander, if not a secret, but why cut corners?
If the underside needs to subspecies, then you can leave, if not - you can not leave. Who do we have on the subspecies?
Photography, of course, leaves much to be, but as I understand it, the point is that there was at least some ispod ssp. trogon.
Irina, the selection kinds of dogs in general does not apply to the extent right. It is even a definition does not apply. It's just convenient, when in the middle of any text there is mention of the form and then, op, you can go directly to the page of the form. Ho.If, for example, the comments in the preceding references are already there, it is not necessary in every new comment jam (the same ...
Alexandr, do I get that right, Ephestia elutella is a wrong ID?
Gonospileia maturata tolerated in Bastilla?
MOVED.
All fixed.
Fixed, excess removed.
Corrected data. Andrey Ponomarev → Vlad Proklov.
Most likely Thailand.
Let's keep this.
I understand you correctly: lepim Dysgonia fulvotaenia and Bastilla arctotaenia, and Bastilla maturata. Types with the same names from the next kind of clean up, adding synonyms (or rather, generic combination). All right?
Alexandr, please upload pics with dry specimens with only one specimen per one pic and if possible without any additional info/marks, you may use instead comments on the species photo page, the additional info section and the field selection "gender/angle".
Removed misleading comments on the topic. Now in the case, the question of adding / reducing species really matured. The following quote their vision algorithms and approaches, if anyone has other views - inform, discuss, and is as follows: The only unique identifier of any kind (as well as supraspecific taxa) on the site - it is his number.Number of pages visible in Urla form (web page address ...
Why produce misery when you can do everything in the framework of the Project without any further problems with the website of the service. Would infa but who spread.
Irina, in your phrase, it turns out that Amphipyra schrenkii wrong and right with C. But contrary. Or I do something wrong?
Yes, apparently, in the blue typo, and it all went ... fix.
Concerning the wills of comments in the system area.
Basil, you suggested at the event Alexey zaregatsya, still it will need for the system of reference collections, and even then it will be possible to affix the author's definition.
Yes, they are such errors. However, perhaps this is not an error funeta, and some system it really is listed as a synonym, and the error is already there.
One of the champions: -)
Ok, corrected. ZY Double dog to work and of comments on the pages of the same types of use, if there is a need:Gortyna fortis.
Duc illustrated all too today ...
Password Vasily sent. And from the comments and the truth the situation is unclear. Miracles.
Corrected data. Pandesma robusta / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov → Not identified.
Corrected data. Anacampsis blattariella / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov → Not identified.
Corrected data. Coleophora deauratella / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov → Not identified.
Corrected data. Phyllonorycter issikii / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov → Not identified.
Corrected data. Pandesma robusta / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov → Not identified.
Corrected data. Anacampsis blattariella / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov → Not identified.
Ugums, removed.
Anyone please confirm?..
Well done.
The data transferred to this species.
Thanks for the tip, Fautua deleted from the description.
Thank isravil.
Guys please check the recent data on Zoran's photos (seen in comments), are IDs right?
Alexandr, if you could add photos without rulers and instead with comment note about size, would be really great.
Eddie, this is not an illustration Orthosia incerta, as an illustration of the subgenus Orthosia. But, nevertheless, you are right, corrected. ZY Please leave comments which relate to certain taxa (eg, subgenus) is on the page of podrada and not its parent taxa (as you do now).
By the way, it is a good idea - to publish landscapes. Perhaps it is somehow optimized? For example, to ship them as usual pictures in the gallery, but only display the pages of photons, to which they belong? Or even once?
News
- 31.10.2024: The website contains English translations (if needed) of most Community/Forum messages
- 24.10.2024: The forum structure has been reworked. New sections have been added, and many topics have been moved to them
- 22.10.2024: Some photo descriptions have been corrected, and incorrect group bindings have been fixed
New photos (01.11.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 21:13, P. Khramov: Most of the non-English comments an...
- 14:23, P. Khramov: It's done....
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Meantime in Japan
- 20th International Insect Fair in Moscow (Russia, October 2023)
- The insects exhibition in Kotlas
- Alive and paper butterflies by The American Museum of Natural History
