E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49... 145

24.10.2014 1:13, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #33276

What it did not identify?

23.10.2014 22:44, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #34404

I'll have to restart from the account Stas ...

23.10.2014 21:29, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #31606

By analogy with other photos from the same individual.

23.10.2014 21:29, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #31606

Corrected data. Not identified → Metamorpha elissa / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

23.10.2014 21:29, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #31607

Corrected data. Not identified → Metamorpha elissa / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

23.10.2014 21:28, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #34410

Yes, it is often in the comments there are "maybe".

23.10.2014 12:27, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #34182

If there genital types are defined by their appearance - it is wrong and needs correction. Throw links will rule. Inaccurate - this is when you have a reason to lean it to this kind among others. Make a list of these grounds pliz.

23.10.2014 12:25, Peter Khramov: comment on Erinnyis ello

Basil, about the migration of butterflies talk tomorrow at the meeting. This page is no longer Saurimo.

23.10.2014 12:24, Peter Khramov: comment on Erinnyis ello

Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: Neotropic → Nearctic, Neotropic.

22.10.2014 22:47, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #34182

Now there is the possibility of binding to other taxa levels. But the future Fautua reserve, yes. Only the type of Untie, Basil, if I agree. And if you do not agree - say where disagrees.

22.10.2014 22:22, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #34182

Znachitsa so. If this species is distinguished from its neighbors only on the genitals and on the basis that in this photo are not visible, then you need to send back to undefined.

22.10.2014 21:29, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #34383

Come on, Basil. It is high time!

22.10.2014 18:38, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #34389

And we have moved into a green winter white winter.

22.10.2014 18:37, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #34383

"It will be an opportunity: I will go :)" He's lying, do not believe him, I do not believe!

22.10.2014 11:24, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #34383

And here Googol. If the authors have published a description, then everything is OK. Dim, published?

21.10.2014 23:15, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #34383

Cool. It must be kind to add. By the way, did not Storozhenki written there? Not the essence, kanesh, but curious.

21.10.2014 23:02, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #34180

A friend pachimu Dumchus not spread copies a section of the collection? .. [Tried to squint curiously, taking a pipe from his mouth]

21.10.2014 22:59, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #34345

And that is true. I'm in the same hotel the Nizhniy Novgorod and said, after 18 hours, no, no! However, it was the winter ...

21.10.2014 15:23, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #34331

Write possible.

20.10.2014 18:37, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #34302

In one click more but now any Fautua a whole lot easier to edit ...

20.10.2014 15:39, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3433

We discussed on the phone, why you need to leave. Accordingly, while the reserve. If someone else will be some questions about the removal of his photographs (author asked to leave, and I did not immediately deleted), it is necessary to pronounce these questions (preferably in the phone) when I enumerated the reasons the author will be not enough, then I foty deleted. Iethe last word of a ...

20.10.2014 13:51, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3367

If it would have been solved to the author, that the author had the opportunity to direct disposal. Negotiate the situation with fotami with numbers less than 5,000 and 10,000 for Skype ...

20.10.2014 13:50, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3274

I am not against such rights for all photographers. Simple interface is not ready for the time being.

20.10.2014 13:47, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3607

Replace this photo with a new image. Although various specimens, in this case it would be better than the deletion. And if you need to change something in the notes / geography, then just change at the same time, that's all.

18.10.2014 15:30, Peter Khramov: comment on Lethe

Yes, it is curious, where does it come from here. Removed.

18.10.2014 6:09, Peter Khramov: comment on Ostrinia nubilalis

Basil is not adding a new disk imaging and correction of old. All Sinev submitted to the site. And if not enough of the region, it is a glitch in the introduction, and it must govern. Typically, this way, in other regions there is an error for the same species. Therefore, in this case, Irina did the right thing.

17.10.2014 23:48, Peter Khramov: comment on Ostrinia nubilalis

Obviously, there were formalized in view of signs that their own way ...

17.10.2014 20:14, Peter Khramov: comment on Periacma delegata

Look, there are different opinions, to which it refers. Moved to the genus is Oecophorinae .

17.10.2014 16:55, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #34161

And / or travel to the promised land.

16.10.2014 13:50, Peter Khramov: comment on Antheraea assamensis

Done.

16.10.2014 13:50, Peter Khramov: comment on Antheraea rosieri

Done.

16.10.2014 13:50, Peter Khramov: comment on Antheraea diehli

Done.

16.10.2014 13:50, Peter Khramov: comment on Antheraea cordifolia

Done.

16.10.2014 13:50, Peter Khramov: comment on Antheraea celebensis

Done.

16.10.2014 13:50, Peter Khramov: comment on Antheraea brunei

Done.

16.10.2014 13:50, Peter Khramov: comment on Antheraea alleni

Done.

16.10.2014 13:46, Peter Khramov: comment on Antheraea semperi

Done.

16.10.2014 13:46, Peter Khramov: comment on Antheraea roylei

Done.

16.10.2014 13:46, Peter Khramov: comment on Antheraea platessa

Done.

16.10.2014 13:46, Peter Khramov: comment on Antheraea mylitta

Done.

16.10.2014 13:46, Peter Khramov: comment on Antheraea moultoni

Done.

16.10.2014 13:46, Peter Khramov: comment on Antheraea larissa

Done.

16.10.2014 13:46, Peter Khramov: comment on Antheraea jana

Done.

16.10.2014 13:46, Peter Khramov: comment on Antheraea helferi

Done.

16.10.2014 13:46, Peter Khramov: comment on Antheraea frithi

Done.

16.10.2014 13:42, Peter Khramov: comment on Antheraea polyphemus

Gone.

16.10.2014 13:42, Peter Khramov: comment on Antheraea montezuma

Gone.

16.10.2014 13:42, Peter Khramov: comment on Antheraea godmani

Gone.

16.10.2014 11:31, Peter Khramov: comment on Maculinea

The subgenus Maculinea http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/13639 transfer the whole thing?

14.10.2014 14:20, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #34140

Corrected data. Not identified → Acraea violae / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

Next page

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.