Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46... 144
Interesting question. For me as if you dig, the more likely it will Zizzulya and Zizzina. Well, if you finally can be Orthodox, you have to give a name originally was something like Cisula.
Report date was? Now it seems to be the rules.
Zizulya and zizinho.
At the time being inaccurate.
Corrected data. Not identified → Zizula hylax / Tentatively identified / Fedor Ovechkin.
Corrected data. Not identified → Magneuptychia libye / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.
The genus 20 species. From them we have information to 3. We assume that the 3 most common. Our species is suitable for one of these three. But perhaps it is suitable and under some of the 17 we do not know. So, definition inaccurate. Somewhere I wrong? And yes. If other fotami the same situation - they are too inaccurate. But the situation is not all of the tropics.Do not exaggerate.
Stas, you can throw a source that can be prostavyat as adding species taxon in? It would be better with a preliminary zaneneseniem him in Literature section (if it is not there).
Stas, you can throw a source that can be prostavyat as an addendum of this taxon in the system? It would be better with a preliminary zaneneseniem him in Literature section (if it is not there).
In these 3 types of sources in this way. If they are really only 3, then we know the problems. But if there are still 20 instead of 3, why you need to look only these three? If they are the most common, or that is in this spirit - then again up to a maximum of inaccurate pulls, is not it?
Basil, I need a source for this species.
Basil, like it is, but as it is not so. After the images are not available for all types (if the image is determined by).
What person develops web interface; -)
I suggest not to bathe. Soon I completed yet interface for curators taxa, and Stas himself all can move, where it sees fit.
Why is not discussing. I now propose to send inaccurate.
With regard to the authorship of pictures of Andrey discussed everything, will now only images taken by the author himself. Andrew, if you still have your gallery foty from third party resources - in the comments below them sign it, I poudalyat.
theme discus gone far away and does not concern an instance in the picture: p Yes Fota still bad, and the author posted just to determine, so that even pomusolit in the comments - all good. Well, it is. You wonder about the Red Book of something. The book is a book, and we all fishing is prohibited for private collections. Nasekomyshey any species, including Pieris rapae and mosquitoes.Well, ...
Before you start fishing in Russia rekomendut familiar with the legislation in this area the best country in the world.
It's not in the glass, of course. Strange else that was kind of nepredelenny from the entomological collection of the BPI. If it is true they have there indefinitely, then the meaning was very load: -)
Clean.
Nope sites across Asia. And Europe is not present.
Corrected data. Vasiliy Feoktistov → Svetlana Shchavelina.
Do not remove and utoschit in habitats where there is such a category in the gallery.
Well, he also says that it is necessary to mold a separate section in the Trouble than a ...
What is the argument? You both agree that habitats are necessary in a separate branch of the gallery.
Cook, eat and forget it as a nightmare.
People, and as caterpillar stage lasts at home?
Corrected data. Cleora determinata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov → Not identified.
Corrected data. Cleora determinata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov → Not identified.
Corrected data. Oenospila altistrix / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov → Not identified.
Corrected data. Oenospila altistrix / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov → Not identified.
Well so what, we deduce from the form or leave?
So what to do?
Nope opinion.
Why can not tolerate that? ..
Jan, this shot is taken at Russian Far East. The species' looks are different there.
Endemic to Hawaii - to describe the kind of information.
Corrected data. Not identified → Plebejus pseudaegon / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Plebejus pseudaegon / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Plebejus subsolanus / Confidently identified / Stan Korb.
There probably is not in angliykom (where do without it), but in this: UpH. Not all catch up. Well, that is like the top side of sense, but the front wing, Ali still as - is in the notes to the book is, and is not present ... So, if possible, better to decipher such things, but if not - then it's better than in any way.
In what?
It is strange that until now can be seen on the Nikon better blue, although it would seem, as the post-processing steps, not like before ... But it is all the lyrics.
I join the call of Demetrius.
This initially interesting. And at this point I was quite interesting all this strain.
Photoshop Photoshop and Nikon are still associated with cool colors. Strange.
Ugums in comments from the author and is given ...
Clean snowstorm. I propose to continue to do without it.
Remove excess from the last commentary. View illustrated. Basil, the site is no day-night party-goers to carry species as soon as immediately. Have you ever seen that took place less than a day since the confirmation Dmitry? ..
What is the objective? Not bad washes.
News
- 31.10.2024: The website contains English translations (if needed) of most Community/Forum messages
- 24.10.2024: The forum structure has been reworked. New sections have been added, and many topics have been moved to them
- 22.10.2024: Some photo descriptions have been corrected, and incorrect group bindings have been fixed
New photos (31.10.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 21:13, P. Khramov: Most of the non-English comments an...
- 14:23, P. Khramov: It's done....
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Meantime in Japan
- Meanwhile, at the "Reptilium"
- Streets: insects names
- Scientists revealed the secret of the diamondback moth
