Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43... 144
Excellent!
Corrected data. Phalera ora / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov → Not identified.
Corrected data. Phalera ora / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov → Not identified.
Corrected data. Phalera ora / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov → Not identified.
Corrected data. Dudusa nobilis удален из синонимов
Corrected data. Dudusa nobilis удален из синонимов
Basil, thanks for the link. Clearly, the translator will sooner or later all the information that he needs. It just takes time. Well, because while we often underestimate accepted, then I translate into numbers: normal manual translation discussion post will cost from 400 to 800 re.Irina, if you're talking about translation from the Japanese, yes - the madness of the brave we sing glory! On the ...
At full speed transfer system ph give birth to supraspecific taxa. Soon it will be possible to carry Chalcosia or even just to Zygaenidae.
If today was a manual translation of comments Site in English, the translator would just shot himself. The inaccurate? Or accurate?
Alexander, let me into your phone Press. You are now free? Or write in the mail when it is more convenient.
Alexander, so all right. So it should be. New photo (32044) is removed completely, and the changing image of the old with the new. Where glitches something? Everything is fine, it is necessary to do exactly the same with the others.
Well so why not now replace this fotoy Fautua №15664 (and similarly with the other, that Vasily removal zakommentil)?
Taki inaccurate or the same determination to the race? And in scope - well, by the way. You can with the time and then there will be signs in the form to add, if that other sources of information is not present.
Alexander, you are not out to change the image in the framework of existing or ph?
Corrected data. Not identified → Sitochroa verticalis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Plebejus argus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Here, the process went like without glitches are now.
Paul, okay, so it is quite possible. A photo with such simple: the site are two pictures, although the picture will be the same to them.
Photo old general could then Dmitry specific name in the field for the subspecies drive ...
Right now Dima kantuper Pacino, will come, and I will punish all!
Pointed.
And why not? We have never written that these photos do not have to stand. So it's quite a question for discussion, not for approval ...
No, not a curve Opera. Browser does not matter here. See. The neighboring comment.
If Fota does not fit into the group at once, you just need to remove it from the previous group. Sometimes there may be such ghosts, when other photons in the group have in fact not, and with TZ foty view - there (due to the fact that there was a period when foty from the site could be deleted without deleting the information about them in the list of groups).You can make phot machine was removed ...
Corrected data. The image has been placed in the photo #34220 group.
Corrected data. The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.
Eugene, or who has access to the author of determination - to hear the response to comments.
They agreed not to produce the same kind of doubles, and replace the old images with new at the same fote ...
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Ruttellerona lithina / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Ruttellerona lithina / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.
Yes, there is not in the heads of these pins themselves are usually very thick.
So like so determined. Or is this a confirmation?
Corrected data. Imago → Female.
Not everyone is clear on how fote can determine the type of, and for some it is impossible. I, for instance, is not obvious. A phot of itself is not bad.
It is necessary to clarify Cameroon? There's a kind of a country as an eight to seven.
You press the edit button at the bottom of this page and in the other photons from the same individual you write the number 36396.
Corrected data. The image has been placed in the photo #36392 group.
Corrected data. Not identified → Euploea midamus / Tentatively identified / Yuri Semejkin.
Corrected data. Not identified → Euploea midamus / Tentatively identified / Yuri Semejkin.
Untethered. Miracles can not be there, if that is not so - the request signal.
Corrected data. Not identified → Pandemis dumetana / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Pandemis dumetana / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.
Google does not see everything, but a lot, so - cool.
Corrected data. Not identified → Lasippa heliodore / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.
Corrected data. Not identified → Lasippa heliodore / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.
That's what the curators and need - to put points on the E within the site (although the view has every right to change over time, but still need some source of final verdict, at least "for now" to these questions).
Corrected data. The image has been placed in the photo #4301 group.
Corrected data. The image has been placed in the photo #4301 group.
Corrected data. The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.
News
- 31.10.2024: The website contains English translations (if needed) of most Community/Forum messages
- 24.10.2024: The forum structure has been reworked. New sections have been added, and many topics have been moved to them
- 22.10.2024: Some photo descriptions have been corrected, and incorrect group bindings have been fixed
New photos (31.10.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 21:13, P. Khramov: Most of the non-English comments an...
- 14:23, P. Khramov: It's done....
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Meantime in Japan
- The petition in defense of biological nomenclature
- Interview with Alexander Zatakovoy, one of the wild Russian entomologists
- Sabre-toothed, big-eyed, horrific: Phyllodes imperialis caterpillar
