Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44... 145
Taki inaccurate or the same determination to the race? And in scope - well, by the way. You can with the time and then there will be signs in the form to add, if that other sources of information is not present.
Alexander, you are not out to change the image in the framework of existing or ph?
Corrected data. Not identified → Sitochroa verticalis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Plebejus argus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Here, the process went like without glitches are now.
Paul, okay, so it is quite possible. A photo with such simple: the site are two pictures, although the picture will be the same to them.
Photo old general could then Dmitry specific name in the field for the subspecies drive ...
Right now Dima kantuper Pacino, will come, and I will punish all!
Pointed.
And why not? We have never written that these photos do not have to stand. So it's quite a question for discussion, not for approval ...
No, not a curve Opera. Browser does not matter here. See. The neighboring comment.
If Fota does not fit into the group at once, you just need to remove it from the previous group. Sometimes there may be such ghosts, when other photons in the group have in fact not, and with TZ foty view - there (due to the fact that there was a period when foty from the site could be deleted without deleting the information about them in the list of groups).You can make phot machine was removed ...
Corrected data. The image has been placed in the photo #34220 group.
Corrected data. The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.
Eugene, or who has access to the author of determination - to hear the response to comments.
They agreed not to produce the same kind of doubles, and replace the old images with new at the same fote ...
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Ruttellerona lithina / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Ruttellerona lithina / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.
Yes, there is not in the heads of these pins themselves are usually very thick.
So like so determined. Or is this a confirmation?
Corrected data. Imago → Female.
Not everyone is clear on how fote can determine the type of, and for some it is impossible. I, for instance, is not obvious. A phot of itself is not bad.
It is necessary to clarify Cameroon? There's a kind of a country as an eight to seven.
You press the edit button at the bottom of this page and in the other photons from the same individual you write the number 36396.
Corrected data. The image has been placed in the photo #36392 group.
Corrected data. Not identified → Euploea midamus / Tentatively identified / Yuri Semejkin.
Corrected data. Not identified → Euploea midamus / Tentatively identified / Yuri Semejkin.
Untethered. Miracles can not be there, if that is not so - the request signal.
Corrected data. Not identified → Pandemis dumetana / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Pandemis dumetana / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.
Google does not see everything, but a lot, so - cool.
Corrected data. Not identified → Lasippa heliodore / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.
Corrected data. Not identified → Lasippa heliodore / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.
That's what the curators and need - to put points on the E within the site (although the view has every right to change over time, but still need some source of final verdict, at least "for now" to these questions).
Corrected data. The image has been placed in the photo #4301 group.
Corrected data. The image has been placed in the photo #4301 group.
Corrected data. The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.
Corrected data. The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.
I waited a while after download ph. I put the illustrations, where objections were not. Where will the specifics - will change and display of pictures. ZY As I understand it, it determines the most part does not itself, as mentioned in the comments on the forums.
Overseas will be sought in the framework Insecta.Pro or at least within the new Lepidoptera.Pro, ie a single international portal, where all boundaries between the languages will not be. Including not a single Russian site.
If we rely only on the Russian Federation - it is already the tube. What is really Tama molbiol.
If Dmitry Pozhogin become curator of the exotic, then sort out. If you will not, boom somebody else to look.
Corrected data. Andrey Ponomarev → Ilia Ustiantcev.
Corrected data. Andrey Ponomarev → Ilia Ustiantcev.
Svyatoslav, loads of photo opportunities without the lines and in the comments, if there is such a need, just write wingspan or the size of the wing. We have the same site rather than book where space is limited and visibility zero.
Corrected data. Andrey Ponomarev → Ilia Ustiantcev.
Two sources indicate that there is. Write as why no.
Remove unnecessary fields from the author and the year.
Corrected data. Glaucopsyche aeruginosa aeruginosa (Staudinger, 1881) → (Staudinger, 1881).
News
- 17.11.2024: Импортированы и переведны последние свежие сообщения с форума. Обновлена страница «О сайте».
- 11.11.2024: The Community/Forum section has become more convenient
- 11.11.2024: Improved scaling of images in the Forum/Community
New photos (22.11.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 15:43, P. Khramov: Я думаю, что нет. Сама эта тема в С...
- 15:37, P. Khramov: К планам добавляется «Избранное» дл...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Entomological seminar in Moscow on November 13
- Entomologist? What kind of job is it?
- 20th International Insect Fair in Moscow (Russia, October 2023)
- Maine needs butterfly surveyors
