Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77... 144

27.03.2013 11:53, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #21570

Doris moved too.

27.03.2013 11:53, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #21569

Sapho! Moved.

27.03.2013 11:52, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #21553

Guys, if you agree, please add the species or synonym...

27.03.2013 11:51, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #21560

Ok, we're not so white-gloved to neglect adding the location ourselves...

27.03.2013 11:49, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #21575

Moved.

27.03.2013 11:49, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #21589

Goes to.

27.03.2013 11:49, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #21576

Moved.

27.03.2013 11:48, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #21572

Will be male.

27.03.2013 11:47, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #21564

Common!

27.03.2013 10:35, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #21571

Right, now female.

27.03.2013 0:42, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #21561

Goes to.

27.03.2013 0:39, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #21500

Moved.

27.03.2013 0:35, Peter Khramov: comment on Celastrina oreas

Irina, then Yuri suggests that in the spread, apparently a mistake: it turns out that the Primorsky Krai - this is the Russian Federation. Typo or what?

26.03.2013 23:08, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #21590

Goes to.

26.03.2013 23:08, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #21574

Moved.

26.03.2013 16:29, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #21589

Alexandr, is the window "The number of another pic of this specimen" seen on this page or not?

25.03.2013 22:56, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #21571

Moved. P. S. Now having some troubles with PC, nearest time I'll update that and start sorting out recently posted pics.

24.03.2013 18:57, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #21549

Alexandr, no one here can see the original filename and the name of the species save the author and administrator.

24.03.2013 18:56, Peter Khramov: comment on Celastrina oreas

Yuri, the page description on the website (ideally) is composed of several sub-blocks: the system, the formal features (those in which either now or in the bright future can be selected species, such as the flight of time, fixed in months)full infa indicating sources and an optional description in the free form (the latter is now available only as "Old describe Lepidoptera.ru». And the algorithm ...

24.03.2013 18:48, Peter Khramov: comment on Nymphalis xanthomelas

Yeah, thank you, fill-with.

24.03.2013 18:47, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #21560

Why not added hte location Madagascar?

23.03.2013 16:58, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #21544

Anatoly, if you meant the shot date, it can be changed in your personal account in the section "Uploaded images". Note to all: that bug concerning large size (pix) photos is fixed, now you may freely upload 3000х3000 pics (just not hundred at a time, ok?).

23.03.2013 16:39, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #21544

Right. Now it's ok.

23.03.2013 16:11, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #21544

That was the inner website bug. Anatoly's reuploading the pic now and after that we'll move the comments to the latest pic version.

23.03.2013 2:19, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6378

Hm, everything works good on my side.

22.03.2013 22:19, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #21544

Where's the pic gone? Was it originally medium size or some bug?

22.03.2013 22:17, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #21535

What a nicey.

20.03.2013 19:23, Peter Khramov: comment on Celastrina ladonides

Irina, local names can be added on the same link as the other form of the Old. The source can not even indicate bo no single registry of Russian names never conducted. ZYLord, I offer ustakanilos to rule that the Russian names are written always in small letters (of itself, except at the offers and similar cases), ie, not copper-butterfly maritime and coastal copper-butterfly, and even, even - ...

20.03.2013 18:41, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6378

Ok Yury, done.

20.03.2013 14:57, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6379

Moved to Celastrina filipjevi.

20.03.2013 12:47, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #21146

MOVED by Acronicta maxima to Parapsestis lichenea. Basil, in cases when it is determined nezaergistrirovan on the site, put the definition of who has brought the Old relevant to your site. For this foty - you. ZY Perens comments from species to fote since they relate to a particular photo is, not species.

20.03.2013 0:31, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6379

Yury, what's your opinion?

18.03.2013 11:21, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13760

So the napi has that as well. They say that the melete has it more and darker from its topside and instead lighter/fewer from the underside. Can't see though the distinctive difference looking at photos...

16.03.2013 23:00, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #21146

Something I do not catch up. It all comments to fote at all or what?

16.03.2013 22:05, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #21490

As for the photos on this page, if you do insist on this is really an example of disguise, please send me the original file and I'll make a wee editing since like now nothing seen. As for the photos #9795 and #9794, please stop being childish, we've ended that discussion year and a half ago there http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/9794, so those two pics will stay as I reckon them interesting from ...