Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78... 145
Moved.
Irina, then Yuri suggests that in the spread, apparently a mistake: it turns out that the Primorsky Krai - this is the Russian Federation. Typo or what?
Goes to.
Moved.
Alexandr, is the window "The number of another pic of this specimen" seen on this page or not?
Moved. P. S. Now having some troubles with PC, nearest time I'll update that and start sorting out recently posted pics.
Alexandr, no one here can see the original filename and the name of the species save the author and administrator.
Yuri, the page description on the website (ideally) is composed of several sub-blocks: the system, the formal features (those in which either now or in the bright future can be selected species, such as the flight of time, fixed in months)full infa indicating sources and an optional description in the free form (the latter is now available only as "Old describe Lepidoptera.ru». And the algorithm ...
Yeah, thank you, fill-with.
Why not added hte location Madagascar?
Anatoly, if you meant the shot date, it can be changed in your personal account in the section "Uploaded images". Note to all: that bug concerning large size (pix) photos is fixed, now you may freely upload 3000х3000 pics (just not hundred at a time, ok?).
Right. Now it's ok.
That was the inner website bug. Anatoly's reuploading the pic now and after that we'll move the comments to the latest pic version.
Hm, everything works good on my side.
Where's the pic gone? Was it originally medium size or some bug?
What a nicey.
Irina, local names can be added on the same link as the other form of the Old. The source can not even indicate bo no single registry of Russian names never conducted. ZYLord, I offer ustakanilos to rule that the Russian names are written always in small letters (of itself, except at the offers and similar cases), ie, not copper-butterfly maritime and coastal copper-butterfly, and even, even - ...
Ok Yury, done.
Moved to Celastrina filipjevi.
MOVED by Acronicta maxima to Parapsestis lichenea. Basil, in cases when it is determined nezaergistrirovan on the site, put the definition of who has brought the Old relevant to your site. For this foty - you. ZY Perens comments from species to fote since they relate to a particular photo is, not species.
Yury, what's your opinion?
So the napi has that as well. They say that the melete has it more and darker from its topside and instead lighter/fewer from the underside. Can't see though the distinctive difference looking at photos...
Something I do not catch up. It all comments to fote at all or what?
As for the photos on this page, if you do insist on this is really an example of disguise, please send me the original file and I'll make a wee editing since like now nothing seen. As for the photos #9795 and #9794, please stop being childish, we've ended that discussion year and a half ago there http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/9794, so those two pics will stay as I reckon them interesting from ...
Moved to females.
Please upload when it's done. I'll keep this photo until there are no other, but it should be eventually changed with anything of a better quality.
To view the information transferred from Troides arfakensis.
To view the information transferred from Troides allottei.
Ok, moved to "uncertain".
Moved.
Goes to.
Moved just as another photo of this specimen.
Thanks, moved.
Moved.
Goes to.
Moved.
Goes to.
Moved.
So any resume?
Looks like it's time to make photo tags. Then one could sort out all the water areas...
Ok, let's start a collection of water areas! I stocked somewhere the image of Satyrium against the Mediterranean Sea...
Guys, if you do know the original location of the emersion/gathering, let's write it down in the respective field instead of using shot location. That will be more appropriate.
Moved.
Goes to.
Author's name to photo can be easily added on upload in the author's comment field.
Yes, which signed as "LA".
Yep, corrected. Weird, more than one such of a bug detected...
It's not that much of a catalogue to cut such a nice background) Just the latter mainly occurs to be rubbish, so have to cut it after photographers. If it's not rubbish, I'm for it to be saved with my own two hands. See, what horrors this catalogue includes: http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/14582. Catalogue it's called.
I meant the website... Odd we don't have this catalogued...
Looks nice with the background seen. With sea even better...
News
- 17.11.2024: Импортированы и переведны последние свежие сообщения с форума. Обновлена страница «О сайте».
- 11.11.2024: The Community/Forum section has become more convenient
- 11.11.2024: Improved scaling of images in the Forum/Community
New photos (24.11.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 21:22, A. Dymchenko: Не перенесено вот это сообщение и в...
- 21:17, A. Dymchenko: Спасибо за ответ, Пётр. В таком слу...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Entomological seminar in Moscow on November 13
- The insects exhibition in Kotlas
- The petition in defense of biological nomenclature
- Largest butterfly migration recorded in Canada
