Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555... 629

07.07.2012 10:20, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13620

Goes to E. glyphica.

07.07.2012 10:20, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13618

Moved.

07.07.2012 10:19, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13619

Whee, one more.

07.07.2012 10:18, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13621

Goes to.

07.07.2012 10:18, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13622

Moved to L. dispar.

06.07.2012 22:52, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13681

Yes, there it is: http://lepidoptera.pro/catalog?regs[]=40&page=2&tax[]=106&photo=on. Moved it.

06.07.2012 22:49, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13547

Yes, didn't move it promptly. Move it to C. culmella as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/13562.

06.07.2012 21:34, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13648

Straight hare.

05.07.2012 23:18, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13573

Goes to I. aversata.

05.07.2012 23:16, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13595

Moved as well as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/13597.

05.07.2012 23:16, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13598

Moved as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/13597.

05.07.2012 23:16, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13599

Moved just as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/13597.

05.07.2012 23:16, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13597

I've just moved all four, it would be great though to make it possible to identify all at once if it's such a group. However, soon there will be a feature connecting photos of one species.

05.07.2012 18:19, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #13603

This species is identified correctly.

05.07.2012 1:10, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13579

Did they multiply!

05.07.2012 1:09, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13566

Moved.

04.07.2012 23:53, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13604

Goes to Colostygia pectinataria.

04.07.2012 23:53, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13607

Moved to Colostygia pectinataria.

04.07.2012 23:51, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13562

Goes to.

04.07.2012 23:50, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13548

Yes, Vitaly happens to make mistakes at times. Moved the second one to "uncertain" as well...

04.07.2012 23:49, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13554

Yes, this is the same specimen, or even species. I play with angles after the main ones are done :--)

04.07.2012 23:48, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13552

Moved.

04.07.2012 23:33, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13569

Moved.

04.07.2012 23:33, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13572

Goes to.

04.07.2012 23:33, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13611

Moved.

04.07.2012 23:32, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13578

Moved out of "undetermined".

04.07.2012 23:28, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13608

Moved.

04.07.2012 23:27, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13600

Ok, move it to "identified successfully".

03.07.2012 12:48, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6177

Moved to "undetermined".

03.07.2012 11:01, Zlopastnyi Brandashmyg: comment on Big khrushchak crawled in

Standard tip: Check your food inventory. There is a forgotten bag of cereals/dried fruits somewhere, and there zoophobas breed. They can also fly in/crawl in from the outside.

02.07.2012 22:20, Lev Bely: comment on Diamondback moths are sterilized to reduce crop loss

The British company Oxitec “updated” diamondback moths (Plutella xylostella) by sterilizing males to reduce crop loss. Oxitec researchers made genetically modified sterile males which are to mate with non-laboratory, “wild” females of the same species. Due to this modification, females of the next brood don't survive to adult stage. The company press-release reads that this is just ...

02.07.2012 21:53, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13558

Moved out of "undetermined".

02.07.2012 21:53, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13560

Thanks, moved.

02.07.2012 21:25, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13520

Whoa, a new species.

02.07.2012 21:25, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13523

Moved to H. maritima.

01.07.2012 19:56, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13543

Goes to.

01.07.2012 19:56, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13545

Moved.

01.07.2012 19:55, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13544

Moved.

01.07.2012 19:55, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13542

Goes to.

01.07.2012 19:55, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13541

Moved.

01.07.2012 19:53, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13495

Thanks, goes to.

01.07.2012 16:52, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #13534

This species is identified correctly.

01.07.2012 14:49, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13531

Dog wears cape.

01.07.2012 14:48, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13503

Long, green, smells like a sausage.

01.07.2012 12:25, Peter Khramov: comment on Melitaea arcesia

Ok, M. baicalensis added as a synonym for M. arcesia. If anyone has other options - offer.

30.06.2012 14:10, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13238

Ok, moved.

30.06.2012 14:08, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3520

Meh, pity. Moved.

29.06.2012 17:20, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #12895

Thanks, the photo goes to Boloria selene.

29.06.2012 10:51, Sanangel: comment on Scarabaeidae (Cetoniinae)

vsevsad, if you "dug up" this forum and start asking something-this is already fine. Take a closer look at her (bronzerka) again and see the perfect creature, which is still a long way away...

28.06.2012 18:51, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #10211

Seems to be some bug happened during the species carry-over from Satyrium to Nordmannia. So this photo and the neighbouring are all Nordmannia eximius, right?