Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133... 169

14.02.2014 13:11, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27582

Corrected data. Not identified → Ellida viridimixta / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

14.02.2014 13:10, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on Epinotodonta leucodera

Year 1892 type description

14.02.2014 13:10, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27580

Corrected data. Not identified → Epinotodonta leucodera / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

14.02.2014 13:09, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27580

I'd prefer A.Schintlmeister, 2008 Allodonta (Hexafrenum) leucodera (Staudinger, 1892), though still we'll move according to Synev otherwise this will be lack in the region. By the way, the description year should be corrected.

14.02.2014 12:56, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27446

When identifying by pic, mistakes can be done, all we're doing here is just share our suppositions about species, the more approximate the more similar and close in colour species are. I have a great respect to Matov, still identifying by pics gives just a supposition about species, and that's basically good. Moved. Doubts kept though :)

14.02.2014 12:49, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27446

Corrected data. Hypena stygiana / Irina Nikulina → Hypena nigrobasalis / Yuri Semejkin.

14.02.2014 11:42, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27446

Yury, did he identify by photo? One more question, you've got in Vladivostok a pro in Siberian noctuids, Vladimir Kononenko, why don't you ask him for help? I've just checked his book where both two species are described, feeling confused, can't choose by pics. The species are similar, alive moths though look kinda different. If no chance to ask Kononenko, we'll move.

13.02.2014 22:47, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27573

Sergey, the pattern looks quite similar, no specific dark areas along the outer band, quite rare though. Other polia don't fit, will wait more, will check and look for. Lots in Far East yet undiscovered :)

13.02.2014 13:43, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27099

1039 :)

13.02.2014 13:39, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27572

Thanks, no doubts anymore. Indeed there are some typos in species names causing wrong search. The more we work with the website, the less mistakes left. Only Petr should correct them in due time, not to forget :).

13.02.2014 13:34, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27098

Irina, you made mistake in the species name. :) No "C" in Deileptenia mandschuriСaria. :)

13.02.2014 13:32, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27098

Corrected data. Not identified → Deileptenia mandschuriaria / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

13.02.2014 13:28, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27556

Maybe the first image on the web. Some authors consider this as an Eastern subspecies of Idaea serpentata. Synev described the species.

13.02.2014 13:24, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27556

Corrected data. Not identified → Idaea dohlmanni / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

13.02.2014 13:20, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27099

Corrected data. / Timothy xeIslYKIvPWtJFxOtTr → Deileptenia mandschuriaria / Irina Nikulina.

13.02.2014 13:19, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27099

Corrected data. Not identified → / Confidently identified / Timothy xeIslYKIvPWtJFxOtTr.

13.02.2014 13:15, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #26223

Corrected data. Confidently identified → Tentatively identified.

13.02.2014 13:15, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #26223

I should have mentioned that the ID wasn't precise, though according to the last revision in 2011 there are only two species of this farinata species group in this location. Nearly no images on the web. So I choose this one. Tentatively identified still.

13.02.2014 13:07, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #26223

Corrected data. Not identified → Lithostege palaestinensis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.02.2014 9:51, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27573

Apamea? Lots of them there :)

13.02.2014 9:51, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27572

Alas, common Amphipyra pyramidea, as I see, there's another species which image I didn't find, Amphipyra schrenkii. The rest are quite different :), Vasily, thanks!

13.02.2014 9:48, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27572

Corrected data. Not identified → Amphipyra pyramidea / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.02.2014 9:39, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27574

Corrected data. Archips xylosteana / Tentatively identified / Imago → Archips oporana / Confidently identified / Male.

13.02.2014 9:36, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27574

Corrected data. Not identified → Archips xylosteana / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.02.2014 1:52, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27570

Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.

13.02.2014 0:32, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #16644

It seems to me, the definition of a photo anyone not offended when corrected, can be no doubt, there may be errors on either side, when there is a very good business disskusiya. and usually born truth (as it may be). Far East, for me, the dark forest, Kononenko and www.jpmoth.org to help me.:) And the definition of the photos ?, I justify all who do it, wrong everything. :) Need to be ...

13.02.2014 0:24, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27556

Will wait, doesn't fit well so far. :)

13.02.2014 0:21, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27087

Corrected data. Not identified → Idaea terpnaria / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

13.02.2014 0:19, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27550

Corrected data. Not identified → Cosmia camptostigma / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

13.02.2014 0:18, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on Cosmia camptostigma

Now it is necessary to remove the image.

13.02.2014 0:17, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #16645

Corrected data. Cosmia camptostigma / Alexandr Zhakov → Cosmia unicolor / Yuri Semejkin.

13.02.2014 0:17, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #16643

Corrected data. Cosmia camptostigma / Alexandr Zhakov → Cosmia unicolor / Yuri Semejkin.

13.02.2014 0:16, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #16644

Corrected data. Cosmia camptostigma / Alexandr Zhakov → Cosmia unicolor / Yuri Semejkin.

13.02.2014 0:15, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #16644

Irina, everyone can make mistakes, I am very often determined by online resources, and there, too, there is always the possibility of error. As he wrote, I also appeal to the mat, for help in determining Dumb complex species. But we should always remember that the definition is on the photos . Other, when the matter is determined by copies.in hand, you can see the lower wings, the back side is ...

12.02.2014 14:34, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27555

Scopula immorata perhaps?

12.02.2014 14:32, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27555

Quite similar to Scopula tessellaria, what's its local version there?

12.02.2014 14:02, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27552

Corrected data. Not identified → Xanthomantis cornelia / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.02.2014 13:47, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27547

Corrected data. → Eurois occulta.

12.02.2014 13:47, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27547

Corrected data. Not identified → / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.02.2014 13:46, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27549

Corrected data. Not identified → Eurois occulta / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.02.2014 13:39, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27546

Golda has straight medial band whilst jacobsoni does curved. :) I believe.

12.02.2014 13:38, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27546

Corrected data. Not identified → Erannis jacobsoni / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

12.02.2014 12:56, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27543

I know both these species and would choose Hydraecia micacea without doubt as a European Hydraecia petasitis is quite a different moth, subspecies in Far East is quite entangling:) Anyway petasitis is way bigger. Will think further.