Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129... 169
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Corrected data. Agonopterix heracliana / Vitaly Gumenuk → Agonopterix ocellana / Tom Tams.
Corrected data. Agonopterix heracliana / Vitaly Gumenuk → Agonopterix ocellana / Tom Tams.
Corrected data. Not identified → Pleuroptya harutai / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.
Zoran, when you post on other sites, some are pictures of butterflies, it is desirable to indicate who defined them. http://www.lepiforum.de/1_forum.pl?page=1;md=read;id=79426 You had to lay out your definition of Cydia pomonella, then you would have had no problem. Now, in the case of placing your photo on the site lepiforum.de, the author of the definition would mean you, but it does not have ...
Igor usually indicate the author of determination on the site of the first to point out the correct name in any form as: Can this kind of Aaaaaaa AAAA, this butterfly reminds me Ppppp pppp. If a person comes and says this is exactly Aaaaaaa AAAA, it is still the author of the first definition.You have specified the old name for this species, now called differently, but that has not changed is ...
Yuri thank you for clarifying the situation. Now just need to decide to make an adjustment in the blue or not. I am personally against it.and on the page of the form, it is necessary to point out that this kind of Now has a different name in the window "Synonyms and combinations of the generic" and the search engine will then issue the vyd, and will be a new directory under him all Peter remake :)
this is something I do not hit. :)
This species is identified correctly.
That is not my message, I usually dogonku announce it I was. :) And with the work Kirpichnikova would be interesting to learn, for general knowledge.
Ira, thank you for the clarification, I think you do not mind, if the definition of authorship Igor leave for?
Corrected data. Brahmaea certhia → Brahmaea tancrei.
Corrected data. Not identified → Acronicta strigosa / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Polypogon gryphalis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Polypogon gryphalis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Xestia baja / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Parapoynx stratiotata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.
Andrey, this might be Phiaris palustrana, you've got another pic of this species from there, just the specimen is brighter. I'll check now a bit more and move. Also Phiaris palustrana is to be sorted out, there are photos of three species :)
Corrected data. Phiaris palustrana / Vitaly Gumenuk → Celypha rivulana / Andrey Ponomarev.
Corrected data. Phiaris palustrana / Vitaly Gumenuk → Celypha rivulana / Andrey Ponomarev.
Stericta atribasalis Warren, 1895 is something different, the author is other. :)
Corrected data. Not identified → Agonopterix propinquella / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Agonopterix propinquella / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.
Irina, this moth is mentioned (pic) in the Key to the insects of the Far East of the USSR (vol. 5. p. 2. page 427, ill. 247(1). If it's there but no species name should check the original source, I spotted this by accident checking Latin names which you found. Got confused with the description year Stericta flavopuncta Inoue & Sasaki, 1995, what was before? So far relying on Synev as for Far East.
Corrected data. Not identified → Lepidogma atribasalis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Celypha flavipalpana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Looks quite similar, very :)
Andrey, got serious doubts on this ID, did Vlad see these pics? What's his thought? The specimen also has red head, this one is not Celypha rurestrana,
Andrey, got serious doubts on this ID, did Vlad see these pics? What's his thought? The specimen also has red head, this is not Celypha rurestrana but rather dark Celypha flavipalpana or Celypha cespitana
Corrected data. Not identified → Xylophanes chiron / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
It is not Daphnis Nerii, it is necessary to remove the name of the Russian.
Alexandr, this might have been commented on the species description page, not here to the photo.
Corrected data. Not identified → Phrixolepia sericea / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Kitanola uncula / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Cydia pomonella / Tentatively identified / Zoran Bozovic → Cydia fagiglandana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Atrophaneura alcinous / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.
Corrected data. Not identified → Psammotis pulveralis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
News
- 17.11.2024: Импортированы и переведны последние свежие сообщения с форума. Обновлена страница «О сайте».
- 11.11.2024: The Community/Forum section has become more convenient
- 11.11.2024: Improved scaling of images in the Forum/Community
New photos (23.11.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 19:40, P. Khramov: Imago → Male & female....
- 15:43, P. Khramov: Я думаю, что нет. Сама эта тема в С...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Entomological seminar in Moscow on November 13
- Streets: insects names
- Interview with Alexander Zatakovoy, one of the wild Russian entomologists
- Butterflies and music: Claire Prendergast, Little Caterpillar
