Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128... 169

04.04.2014 13:25, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #28205

Corrected data. Not identified → Pasiphila rectangulata / Tentatively identified / Basil Sergienko.

04.04.2014 13:23, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #25131

I am in severe cases also turn to Matt, he always consults, and speaks the best option. but only determines the material in hand (in severe cases).

04.04.2014 13:12, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #25131

Basil, you are 100% right about the label, there is the definition of a material that determine the author holds, sees the size of small parts, the lower wing and the opposite direction, when neohodimosti can cook. In the photo is different, with the often expressed the most likely match a particular type. especially in difficult cases. and it is not a definition.Most of the possibility of error, ...

04.04.2014 10:20, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #28243

Corrected data. Colocasia coryli → Colocasia mus.

04.04.2014 10:19, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #28243

Corrected data. Not identified → Colocasia coryli / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.04.2014 10:17, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #25131

The question, agree Does Alex Matt, whatever its definition or assumption of photographs exhibited in the network ?. If you agree, then no problems. And no, then there is no question.

03.04.2014 14:52, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #8108

Corrected data. → Vitaly Gumenuk.

03.04.2014 14:51, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #8108

Corrected data. Not identified → Coleophora trifolii / Tentatively identified / .

03.04.2014 13:47, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #28206

For Europe would be fine, but for DV in inaccurate, there may be something else there.

03.04.2014 13:45, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #28206

Corrected data. Not identified → Eupithecia subfuscata / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

03.04.2014 13:30, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #3691

My opinion, the caterpillar is fully sootvetvstvuet idea of Cucullia asteris. Hence, two variants of correct answers: 1. It really Cucullia asteris, at the Sineva it is listed for the adjacent region 28 in question. It can go further east, with such a huge baochka paleoarkticheskim habitat could easily. 2.This is another kind of caterpillar Cucullia, the caterpillars form a color or no in ...

02.04.2014 20:30, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #28204

Corrected data. Not identified → Zola terranea / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

01.04.2014 16:10, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #2329

Corrected data. Melitaea phoebe → Melitaea cinxia.

01.04.2014 16:10, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #2329

Corrected data. Confidently identified / Simon Coombes → Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

01.04.2014 15:37, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #2329

Just do not phoebe, on account cinxia question, there still has Melitaea arduinna, where the photo?

31.03.2014 17:03, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #28184

Corrected data. Confidently identified → Tentatively identified.

31.03.2014 17:03, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #28184

Corrected data. Not identified → Orthosia paromoea / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

31.03.2014 17:02, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #28185

Corrected data. Not identified → Orthosia paromoea / Tentatively identified / Yuri Semejkin.

31.03.2014 15:50, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #28185

Yuri. This kind of scoop Orthosia. The only but ... - you have about 10 species, and the only one that I knowOrthosia incerta, it is not. :)

31.03.2014 0:38, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #28108

Corrected data. Not identified → Zizina otis / Confidently identified / Eugene Karolinskiy.

29.03.2014 23:12, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on Casignetella granulatella

Page synonymous http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/14582 combine necessary.

29.03.2014 23:10, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #6484

These two pages should unite, it is one kind.

29.03.2014 23:07, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #6484

Ira, three years, all female bears scoops steel :) I do not remember what was necessary to put that into the blue.

29.03.2014 22:23, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27787

Corrected data. Not identified → Melitaea sutschana / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

29.03.2014 22:22, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27128

Corrected data. → Melitaea sutschana.

29.03.2014 22:18, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27128

Corrected data. Not identified → / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.03.2014 22:17, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27129

Corrected data. Not identified → Melitaea ambigua / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.03.2014 22:13, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27757

Corrected data. Not identified → Rhodoneura shini / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.03.2014 22:11, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27788

Corrected data. Irina Nikulina → Shamil Murtazin.

29.03.2014 21:34, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27788

Corrected data. Not identified → Euphydryas ichnea / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.03.2014 20:44, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #28015

As I anticipated, on lepiforum.de http://www.lepiforum.de/webbbs/media/f1_2012/79/79426_1.jpg exposed photos, and I definitely was not specified. Zoran, you are working with a number of sites that need to be correct and prevent such missteps.

29.03.2014 12:37, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on Multicoloria partitella

Note to the form Coleophora partitella (removed from the base of 11.09.2014 23:26): Combine on page Multicoloria partitella, is one type.

29.03.2014 11:52, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on Casignetella inulae

Note to the form Coleophora inulae (removed from the base of 01.04.2014 14:42): page must be removed, this kind already exists in the way Casignetella.

29.03.2014 10:25, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #28066

Corrected data. Not identified → Herminia stramentacealis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.03.2014 10:25, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #28066

Irina, I agree with your conclusions, but if you could see the lower wing, the issue would be dropped :)

28.03.2014 18:21, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #21250

Corrected data. Not identified → Trotocraspeda divaricata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

28.03.2014 18:18, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #23062

On the third, only one kind and the other kind. A kind of ussurialis (Bremer, 1864), and the kind and volume. it is necessary to clean up the race and all this to bear :)

28.03.2014 18:10, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #28146

Corrected data. Imago → Female.

28.03.2014 18:10, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #13466

Corrected data. Imago → Female.

28.03.2014 18:09, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #13466

This species is identified correctly.

28.03.2014 18:07, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #28146

I would say that the female.

28.03.2014 17:58, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #23062

Yuri, see what you have written, and this is a reason, such as to connect these types, which do not differ in appearance. And if there is a photo, it must be visible from all three species. Peter, it's technically possible to do?

28.03.2014 17:53, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #23062

Seriously, from 5 species of this genus that are for LW from three just such a painting, alas. But what is interesting at the blue of Russia for their 6 and on the website are only 4, Peter, where another 2? jessica (Butler, 1878) and taiwanensis Yamanaka, 1972

28.03.2014 17:36, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #23062

The doctor said the morgue, then to the morgue. :) If the author of a monograph on the moth DV, speaks only of the genitals, then on a photo or like. remain sp. For these types of option definition only if a copy of the photo attached, and the quality thereof is not important, but this is only for advanced toward entomology photographers. :)