Pages: 1 ...141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149... 169
Sergei, a bad example brought, Amphipoea, visually determined without genitals, with high probability, the tech is important habitats, and other factors. In this case, we deliberately write lies.we know that the definition of 50/50, we do not know the differences between these species (in other regions there may be more than 2), and should be the premise on which we transfer photos to this ...
I will be humble and answer carefully, such Hecatera dysodea I have not seen this butterfly with this I have not synonymous, I would not began to define and transfer it to Hecatera dysodea my hand does not rise :)
Remove only need low-quality photos. All others may eventually decide. This is especially true remote regions, will open a new life and a good sprinkling definition :)
The complex case that has long defined Pekarsky photos, and according to the rules of this site, I put the definition of Sergei Kotov. I wanted to put two, this was difficult.
Sergei, do not dissemble, I have never scolded, reprimanded, bantered, indignant, taught, yes, but not abused :) I do not blame you for that. And now a very complicated case, this image is determined in mobiole Oleg Pekarsky http://molbiol.ru/forums/lofiversion/index.php/t523212.html God forgive me, Peter, try to insert in the definition of the two, what happens? and nothing will have no room ...
Continued lower fasting accidentally loaded. propinquella, some types of images are not found. And the catalog is not a dogma, new all time are. And let you prove that it is this or that kind, but I'm not that this is a misnomer.Do not rush to weigh everything, and if in doubt, say in this case, once again shift responsibility for determining the other. Here no one asks to urgently define ...
Sergey, I correct your mistakes, and you vozmuschaeshsya, should I be indignant, and ban the wrong definition of too much for one person. Your desire to rake the pile of undetermined species is very commendable but do not do it by eye, and seems to come, experts still are not here, are not correct.There are professionals and see the error. To begin with, I'm not an expert in this group, if I ...
Sergey, our aim is not just move from not identified to confidently identified but do it right. :) And I'll stand for this position. Let's hide emotions which impede the business. I'll give a reply now on Agonopterix on its page.
Corrected data. Pyrgus malvae / Confidently identified → Pyrgus serratulae / Tentatively identified.
There are no flight periods noticed, the rest is only your imagination as well as the location. And Sergey please less nervous, I think we've here for the same purpose to make this site better, so let's make it such :)
Yes, I opt for a small Permi: or Pyrgus serratulae, or Pyrgus alveus. It does not know about the local timing of the summer and spread of these species.
Sergey, tell me, how do you so confidently confirm the species from such a difficult group like Agonopterix, even their AL Lviv, to determine the exact picks for cooking. :). It is notAgonopterix arenella, that lighter.