Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150... 169

25.10.2013 11:36, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #5411

Corrected data. Lobophora halterata / Nikolai Vladimirov → Trichopteryx carpinata / Alexandr Zhakov.

25.10.2013 11:34, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #5414

Corrected data. Lobophora halterata / Nikolai Vladimirov → Trichopteryx carpinata / Alexandr Zhakov.

25.10.2013 11:23, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #13181

Corrected data. Trichopteryx carpinata / Tatyana Gordeeva → Lobophora halterata / Sergei Kotov.

25.10.2013 11:19, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #22352

Corrected data. Not identified → Teleiopsis diffinis / Confidently identified / Masha Gill.

25.10.2013 11:17, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #22352

This species is identified correctly.

25.10.2013 4:03, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on Cnephasia stephensiana

no, not synonymous and this is important :)

25.10.2013 3:54, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #6103

Corrected data. Confidently identified → Tentatively identified.

25.10.2013 3:52, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #8100

Corrected data. Not identified → Eilema griseola / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.10.2013 22:12, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #21874

Sergei, a number of births is shaped wings, among them there are almost white. Only on the inside of the wings, I would not define pterophoridae and do not advise you :)

24.10.2013 21:54, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #16781

This species is identified correctly.

20.10.2013 14:14, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #16781

Peter, photo 3731, Vasily, was promptly after the determination is transferred to the form, and then back to my comments, with the post to move the species disappeared, and was identified as Sergei Kotov. :)

20.10.2013 11:50, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #16781

Clearly wrong author's ID, this is evidently not Opigena polygona, some hadenina, can't say precisely without location and date, anyway should be moved out of here. Vasily, how come there's no moving back to not identified whilst we've just seen it here http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/3731

19.10.2013 18:33, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #22345

Aplocera plagiata

19.10.2013 18:24, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #8261

Emmelina monodactyla

19.10.2013 16:23, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #9907

It's 100% NOT Pandesma robusta (Walker, 1858) :)

19.10.2013 16:23, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #9906

This butterfly to Pandesma robusta (Walker, 1858) or what to do. :)

19.10.2013 15:43, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #13114

View is wrong, it Ancylis uncella The ill-defined put photos when they can choose between how much very similar views. There are different tribes,

19.10.2013 15:20, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #24010

it is right :)

19.10.2013 15:16, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #10383

Determination Vlad Proklova maximum that can be squeezed out of the picture, all the rest of the evil :)

19.10.2013 14:50, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #13131

Sergei, such definitions, you put all your work into question. This is not a moth, it Gelechiidae.

19.10.2013 14:38, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #13553

What's really happening here? :))) Here even family is doubtful, as for the species I can 100% guarantee this is not Damophila deauratella (Lienig & Zeller, 1846), or here Coleophora deauratella Lienig & Zeller 1846 Sergey please refrain from such inaccurate IDs :)

19.10.2013 14:26, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #13559

Yes, gentlemen, we clocked. Basil, Sergei wrote Eana incanana (Stephens 1852), not Dichrorampha incanana (Clemens, 1860) (this species in Europe is not, and it all from a different subfamily). Sergei, you have to put a monument, if you are on such a photo to determine the type Cnephasiini, I used to kind of do not come from, though digested hundreds of them;)