E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154... 169

02.02.2013 13:53, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #20704

Polyommatus icarus.

02.02.2013 13:18, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #20567

Araschnia levana.

02.02.2013 13:16, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #16968

That's it.

26.01.2013 15:06, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #8953

Same do I say :)

25.01.2013 22:25, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #11308

:) It's a bit more complicated, I checked species of Sciota genus, nearly all Vitaly's IDs are doubtful. Will try to sort them out, not sure will be successful though :(

25.01.2013 17:36, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #20303

Calamotropha paludella.

25.01.2013 17:36, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #20302

Calamotropha paludella.

25.01.2013 13:43, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #11308

Definitely not Sciota rhenella. The original ID is right, don't you find Vlad Proklov a pro?

25.01.2013 12:56, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #16644

Yury, I myself apply to Matov in difficult cases. What you suggest is already realized on molbiol.ru, http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?act=SF&s=&f=40, where they got discussions and somewhat non classified images by group. Here instead everything's classified, dicussions are separated though.

24.01.2013 19:54, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #20279

This species is identified correctly.

24.01.2013 19:54, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #20276

This species is identified correctly.

24.01.2013 19:51, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #20283

This species is identified correctly.

24.01.2013 19:49, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #16644

ID by photo can be a wrong thing, whilst I compared this one to pics on other websites, Matov has at hand the WHOLE collection of the Zoological Institute RAS, obviously, he should know better :)

23.01.2013 22:39, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #20242

Thus the thing is in some bugs on upload. Anyway, better to have photos wrongly named :) than to have nothing to correct :(

23.01.2013 22:07, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #8745

Agree. :)

23.01.2013 21:09, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #8745

Udea, can't get the species sadly.

23.01.2013 20:47, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #20241

This species is identified correctly.

23.01.2013 20:46, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #8751

This is not Aphomia sociella, another family, Calamotropha paludella. Vitaly, in case you've got no sure ID, please note your guess in the "author's comment" field and don't name the very specimen. If you're right, your ID will be noted, if not, moth will stay "undetermined".

23.01.2013 20:45, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #20242

This is not Aphomia sociella, another family, Calamotropha paludella. Vitaly, in case you've got no sure ID, please note your guess in the "author's comment" field and don't name the very specimen. If you're right, your ID will be noted, if not, moth will stay "undetermined".

23.01.2013 20:20, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #20222

This photo allows to guess just family and genus, Coleophoridae, Coleophora in Western system, and family only in Eastern.

23.01.2013 20:13, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #20221

This is not Incurvaria oehlmanniella, another family, likely Lampronia capitella, maybe that one exactly. :)

23.01.2013 0:14, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #20184

Yep, "uncertain" :)

23.01.2013 0:11, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #6273

It's the only one photo on the linked website for 8 years the species has been on the web and that forum, so questionable. Also not sure that's the same species we've got here. Visually, at least. There are pics of this moth on http://www.lepbarcoding.org, named Diaphania sp. though. I'd wait for some sure thing. :)

22.01.2013 22:32, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #20220

Anania hortulata.

22.01.2013 21:19, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #20208

Lampronia corticella.

22.01.2013 20:37, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #20187

Eupithecia centaureata.

22.01.2013 20:34, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #20191

Anania hortulata.

22.01.2013 20:30, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #20193

Enargia paleacea.

22.01.2013 20:28, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #20186

Acronicta rumicis.

22.01.2013 20:26, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #20180

Hydraecia micacea.

22.01.2013 20:25, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #20179

Mythimna impura, questionable.

22.01.2013 20:19, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #20188

Polia bombycina.

22.01.2013 20:16, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #20190

Male.

22.01.2013 20:15, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #20190

Agrotis segetum.

22.01.2013 20:14, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #20189

Anarta trifolii.

22.01.2013 20:12, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #20185

This species is identified correctly.

21.01.2013 2:41, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #6273

4 out of 7 are right IDs and 3 aren't.

21.01.2013 2:02, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #6273

Nah, not right. There are only three of them with Diaphania nitidalis, the rest what Lev IDed are quite questionable, it's a different species.

20.01.2013 14:18, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #20143

I see this should be moved.

19.01.2013 22:40, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #20136

This species is identified correctly.

19.01.2013 22:20, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #6150

Vitaly has some trouble with upload so that the species identified right come up incorrectly named.

19.01.2013 21:51, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #6357

This species is identified correctly.

19.01.2013 16:24, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #19989

Wrong ID, this is Hedya ochroleucana.

19.01.2013 16:13, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #6120

Wrong ID, this is Pseudeustrotia candidula.

19.01.2013 16:13, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #6119

Wrong ID, this is Pseudeustrotia candidula.

19.01.2013 16:04, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #20072

I think this is wrongly identified.

19.01.2013 16:04, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #20070

I think, this species is identified wrongly.

19.01.2013 15:58, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #20076

This tortrix moth is of the different subfamily, Cochylini tribe, can't say more by such moth condition and angle. :(

19.01.2013 14:35, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #20059

Got to be Clepsis spectrana, assumedly.

18.01.2013 13:14, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #19951

Pleuroptya ruralis.

Next page

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.