Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151... 169
Pleuroptya ruralis
Thysanoplusia intermixta
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
There is probably a bug in the photo is not Maliattha amorpha, kind of I do not know, but I assume that this is not Noctuidae, but something of Pyraloidea.
Celastrina argiolus
Lacanobia w-latinum
Peter, I too confused. :-)
Perth, neither of which you are not confused? :-)
Masha, bravo. Vitaly can sometimes be wrong :))
Eriogaster lanestris
Odezia atrata
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
sign? - Russian is a comma in the English keyboard is :(
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
SheEulithis populata? Peter bravely endure. :)
This species is identified correctly.
Yuri, you have already exhibited this type :)) http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/13851 Ptycholoma imitator
Clostera curtula
Orthosia incerta
Phymatopus hecta
Brenthis ino
Atolmis rubricollis
Atolmis rubricollis
Atolmis rubricollis
Alex, you'll specify the name or help? :)
Alex, you'll specify the name or help? :)
Who can say that it is a living butterfly, let him first cast a stone at me :)))
It is necessary to fix itTrachea atriplicis
There was, I still poulybalsya through 3 specific photo was. But probably I hurried, everything was still in the process. :)
Pseudopanthera macularia
Lycaena dispar
Lycaena dispar
Eumedonia eumedon
Eumedonia eumedon
Sorry, here it is under this name :)))Eumedonia eumedon
Aricia eumedon
Myelois circumvoluta:)))
Myelois circumvoluta:)))
This is an easy case, Perth, will come to fix :)
Yes. It Ancylis, but to determine the type of photo ...
Whoops! I did not notice that? to the exact same as the previously determined angle is normal :)
Archips podana, female.
I must disappoint you, Irina, is a butterfly from another family. :( Family Pyralidae viewsMyelois circumvoluta
Definitely not, this "friend" of a kind likely Pandemis, but certainly not Archips.
You'll laugh, but neither of which is not similar. You can spuat perhaps with a female Archips rosana, but it has a lighter image, and there is no shade on the outside of the upper wings.
Archips podana, female. Cook is not necessary. Angle try to choose a better :)))
News
- 17.11.2024: Импортированы и переведны последние свежие сообщения с форума. Обновлена страница «О сайте».
- 11.11.2024: The Community/Forum section has become more convenient
- 11.11.2024: Improved scaling of images in the Forum/Community
New photos (22.11.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 22:10, A. Dymchenko: Пётр, да, она, спасибо. Там, как я...
- 18:43, A. Kuzmin: Ещё несколько перепонов из Амурской...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Entomological seminar in Moscow on November 13
- Meanwhile, at the "Reptilium"
- Interview with Alexander Zatakovoy, one of the wild Russian entomologists
- Butterflies and music: The Gumm Sisters, Where The Butterflies Kiss the Buttercups Goodnight
