Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151... 169
Pleuroptya ruralis
Thysanoplusia intermixta
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
There is probably a bug in the photo is not Maliattha amorpha, kind of I do not know, but I assume that this is not Noctuidae, but something of Pyraloidea.
Celastrina argiolus
Lacanobia w-latinum
Peter, I too confused. :-)
Perth, neither of which you are not confused? :-)
Masha, bravo. Vitaly can sometimes be wrong :))
Eriogaster lanestris
Odezia atrata
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
sign? - Russian is a comma in the English keyboard is :(
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
SheEulithis populata? Peter bravely endure. :)
This species is identified correctly.
Yuri, you have already exhibited this type :)) http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/13851 Ptycholoma imitator
Clostera curtula
Orthosia incerta
Phymatopus hecta
Brenthis ino
Atolmis rubricollis
Atolmis rubricollis
Atolmis rubricollis
Alex, you'll specify the name or help? :)
Alex, you'll specify the name or help? :)
Who can say that it is a living butterfly, let him first cast a stone at me :)))
It is necessary to fix itTrachea atriplicis
There was, I still poulybalsya through 3 specific photo was. But probably I hurried, everything was still in the process. :)
Pseudopanthera macularia
Lycaena dispar
Lycaena dispar
Eumedonia eumedon
Eumedonia eumedon
Sorry, here it is under this name :)))Eumedonia eumedon
Aricia eumedon
Myelois circumvoluta:)))
Myelois circumvoluta:)))
This is an easy case, Perth, will come to fix :)
Yes. It Ancylis, but to determine the type of photo ...
Whoops! I did not notice that? to the exact same as the previously determined angle is normal :)
Archips podana, female.
I must disappoint you, Irina, is a butterfly from another family. :( Family Pyralidae viewsMyelois circumvoluta
Definitely not, this "friend" of a kind likely Pandemis, but certainly not Archips.
You'll laugh, but neither of which is not similar. You can spuat perhaps with a female Archips rosana, but it has a lighter image, and there is no shade on the outside of the upper wings.
Archips podana, female. Cook is not necessary. Angle try to choose a better :)))
News
- 12.10.2024: Fixed sorting/ordering errors (Gallery and Catalog sections)
- 10.10.2024: We fixed bad situation with photo captions for insect species that are not yet in the website database
- 31.08.2024: Первые итоги интеграции/переноса/дублирования Молбиола и Инсекты
New photos (19.10.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 13:24, P. Khramov: Not identified → Pseudozizeeria mah...
- 13:24, P. Khramov: / / → Pseudozizeeria maha / Con...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Meantime in Japan
- The petition in defense of biological nomenclature
- Meanwhile, at the "Reptilium"
- Butterflies and music: Celtic Woman
