Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152... 169

11.06.2013 1:01, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #22403

Maria, why it is not safe to properly define. :)

11.06.2013 1:00, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #22401

This species is identified correctly.

11.06.2013 1:00, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #22402

This species is identified correctly.

10.06.2013 13:32, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #21182

Why look like? it is. :)

09.06.2013 0:29, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #22350

Scolitantides orion

09.06.2013 0:29, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #22349

Scolitantides orion

09.06.2013 0:27, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #22340

Siona lineata

09.06.2013 0:27, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #22339

Siona lineata

30.05.2013 18:14, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #22255

Argynnis paphia, male.

28.05.2013 1:39, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #22208

Mistakes another, it is notHyles euphorbiae, itHyles gallii100% :)

24.05.2013 11:47, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #13785

Spilosoma niveum synonymChionarctia nivea

24.05.2013 11:42, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #14121

All right, this is another synonym.

22.05.2013 17:52, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #13987

I do not like it at European Catocala nupta, WA on many species of this genus do not want to define, and then get into the debate on the correctness of the definition. :)

22.05.2013 17:46, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #22081

Panemeria tenebrata, ? - It was a comma in the Eng. clave

22.05.2013 17:44, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #22081

Panemeria tenebrata? Sinev is not being. :)

13.05.2013 23:39, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #21966

Camptogramma bilineata

13.05.2013 23:08, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #21972

Lithostege griseata

13.05.2013 23:08, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #21978

Lithostege griseata

13.05.2013 22:41, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #21980

Lamoria anella

13.05.2013 22:41, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #21989

Lamoria anella

13.05.2013 22:40, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #21988

Lamoria anella

13.05.2013 22:40, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #21985

Lamoria anella

13.05.2013 21:22, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #21979

Autographa gamma

13.05.2013 21:07, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #21993

Eublemma minutata

13.05.2013 21:05, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #21975

Agrotis exclamationis

12.05.2013 20:36, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #21985

Ivan, butterflies all Volgograd? Then almost all determined.

11.05.2013 22:51, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #21973

no date and place, let it beConistra vaccinii, but this is not accurate.

11.05.2013 22:47, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #21973

No, not Orthosia incerta, and that now you look.

29.04.2013 22:25, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #21875

Everyone here behaves like that, and who doesn't, reads what others write :))) Then starts doing the same :)

17.04.2013 1:43, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #21799

I didn't think of such a version, Aricia eumedon :( Can't say anything sure in this situation, but Evgeny's arguments sound solid.

16.04.2013 20:45, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #21812

This species is identified correctly.

16.04.2013 20:45, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #21811

This species is identified correctly.

16.04.2013 20:45, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #21810

This species is identified correctly.

16.04.2013 20:45, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #21809

This species is identified correctly.

15.04.2013 22:00, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #21782

If I say they have completely different undersides, you won't believe me. :) See how it's shown in this pic, you'll get where to look at. :) http://www.lepiforum.de/lepidopterenforum/lepiwiki/pics/jens_philipp/thersites_icarus_agestis_Vergleich_US.jpg

15.04.2013 18:56, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #21797

Aricia artaxerxes.

15.04.2013 18:56, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #21798

Aricia artaxerxes. Irina, your photos are way better than many other of "good" quality, worth keeping here. The angle is perfect to ID this species, both wing sides are seen.

15.04.2013 18:50, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #21799

This species is identified correctly.

15.04.2013 18:50, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #21799

Not sure about female. :)

15.04.2013 0:16, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #21782

If no spots, then let's think this is Aricia artaxerxes, still better to look at those photos. :)

14.04.2013 2:01, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #21784

Thanks for the pic, now can say definitely Polyommatus amandus.

13.04.2013 19:04, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #21783

I'd say this is Polyommatus amandus.

13.04.2013 12:46, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #21776

:) http://molbiol.ru/forums/lofiversion/index.php/t383382.html If you're really interested, then it's worth making "a long search to clear this out". One can't give the sole and right answer, just his/her own personal opinion as to what's right. I'm faunist and content with that at this stage they refer Eastern European populations to Pontia edusa. :)

13.04.2013 1:41, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #21773

Polyommatus icarus.

13.04.2013 1:38, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #21773

Polyommatus icaru.

13.04.2013 1:37, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #21774

Argynnis paphia.

13.04.2013 1:34, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #21775

Lycaena dispar.

13.04.2013 1:32, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #21776

Yury, now it's deemed that there is another species in Russia, Pontia edusa, they don't differ in appearance, but I can't answer your possible question what's the difference between them, this is still a problem for taxonomists to solve, anyway it's generally accepted that all previous references to daplidice now considered edusa, which substitutes the species in the east of Europe. :)