Insecta.pro Community

23.10.2014 17:24, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34526

Corrected data. Alexander Belousov → Alexandr Zhakov.

23.10.2014 15:00, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34405

Corrected data. Not identified → Eudemis profundana / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.10.2014 15:00, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34511

Corrected data. Not identified → Eudemis profundana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.10.2014 14:59, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34512

Corrected data. Not identified → Eudemis profundana / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.10.2014 14:59, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34513

Corrected data. Not identified → Eudemis profundana / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.10.2014 14:59, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34524

Corrected data. Not identified → Eudemis profundana / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.10.2014 14:49, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34513

It leans more toward Eudemis profundana, where the main coarse oak, while Eudemis porphyrana Rosaceae, oak, willow - is rare. Probably it can be inaccurate Eudemis profundana

23.10.2014 13:51, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34405

The determinants of the Hebrews. USSR (t.IV, P1, page 414) for Eudemis profundana only Europe and Asia Minor, probably really happened in the invasion DV :))

23.10.2014 13:42, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34511

Yuri, thank you, I saw, but wanted to clarify :)

23.10.2014 13:40, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34405

just wanted polest determinant in DV, and you had already. :))

23.10.2014 13:24, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34405

There Eudemis profundana, there are three other species, or I do not look back? http://jpmoth.org/Tortricidae/Olethreutinae/Eudemis.html

23.10.2014 13:01, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34511

It's a butterfly emerged from the chrysalis?

23.10.2014 12:57, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34513

Yuri, and on what the plant assembled pupa?

23.10.2014 11:57, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34405

Yes, Yuri, the Butterfly reliably determined by genitalia, but I reviewed many images in the net, both from Europe and from Asia to Europe and the literature, but did not find E. porphyrana with a red back and red beams of her scales. If the butterflies are not collected. then we have two options: 1.Interesting color variation Eudemis porphyrana, which is not among the scanned image of this ...

23.10.2014 0:46, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34405

I would sayEudemis profundana, but it is not in Siberia.

22.10.2014 20:25, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34390

Corrected data. Not identified → Xanthia ocellaris / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

22.10.2014 17:34, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #6142

Corrected data. Confidently identified → Tentatively identified.

22.10.2014 17:33, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #32145

Corrected data. Not identified → Eudemis porphyrana / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

22.10.2014 16:38, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34182

Basil, you'll again say that finding fault, why it should be persimilis? The island has four species of this genus, and 3 are the same, all the genital, the remaining differences are very small and in the photo are not visible.

22.10.2014 16:18, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34402

Corrected data.

22.10.2014 14:46, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34383

Vasily, do look and endure. Eversmann article is the original description. If a problem, then I can do.

22.10.2014 14:21, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34383

Dmitry, if I did not read the article, I would not have written previous posts. I merely stated my opinion that in no way detracts from, that great work that has been done by the description of this taxon. This is clearly not a subspecies may polyploidy or some mutant recessive gene, enshrined in a typical neighborhood.In any case the information in the synonyms can not be expected in the coming ...

22.10.2014 11:50, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34383

In addition to publishing with the original description, there is a publication of this type? Are there any other findings of this species? With all due respect to the authors describe, remain serious doubts about his independence (for me), even so, his identification by other entomologists among Lymantria dispar. It may be that the form will be reliably known only from the type series.The ...

22.10.2014 1:34, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #28978

Corrected data. Not identified → Tetheella fluctuosa / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.10.2014 22:28, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #31632

Corrected data. Not identified → Steremnia selva / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

21.10.2014 22:28, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #31633

Corrected data. Not identified → Steremnia selva / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

21.10.2014 22:26, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34364

Corrected data. Not identified → Perigonia lusca / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.10.2014 22:25, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34363

Corrected data. Not identified → Perigonia lusca / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.10.2014 22:07, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34368

Corrected data. Not identified → Erinnyis crameri / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.10.2014 22:07, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34367

Corrected data. Not identified → Erinnyis crameri / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.10.2014 21:54, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34314

Corrected data. Not identified → Euptoieta claudia / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

21.10.2014 21:54, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34315

Corrected data. Not identified → Euptoieta claudia / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

21.10.2014 21:52, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34202

This determined you :)))

21.10.2014 21:51, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34202

Corrected data. Not identified → Ascalapha odorata / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.10.2014 21:51, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34372

Corrected data. Not identified → Callionima calliomenae / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.10.2014 21:50, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34371

Corrected data. Not identified → Callionima calliomenae / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.10.2014 21:44, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34321

Corrected data. Not identified → Libytheana terena / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

21.10.2014 21:44, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34320

Corrected data. Not identified → Libytheana terena / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

21.10.2014 21:37, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34323

Corrected data. Not identified → Eunica monima / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

21.10.2014 21:37, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34322

Corrected data. Not identified → Eunica monima / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

21.10.2014 21:36, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34341

Corrected data. Not identified → Lucinia cadma / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

21.10.2014 21:35, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34342

Corrected data. Not identified → Lucinia cadma / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

21.10.2014 21:33, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34370

Corrected data. Not identified → Manduca brontes / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.10.2014 21:33, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34369

Corrected data. Not identified → Manduca brontes / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.10.2014 21:22, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34348

Corrected data. Not identified → Eumorpha vitis / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.10.2014 21:21, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34347

Corrected data. Not identified → Eumorpha vitis / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.10.2014 21:20, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34350

Corrected data. Not identified → Eumorpha labruscae / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.10.2014 21:20, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34349

Corrected data. Not identified → Eumorpha labruscae / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.10.2014 21:08, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34375

Corrected data. Not identified → Hyles lineata / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.10.2014 21:02, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34202

Alexander, my definition, only if it is the same instance as the unfolding of a butterfly, then it was necessary to connect them to the group. But the ragged, as a whole. If you are similarly determined that this same form, then it is your definition. :)))

Atalopedes campestris (Boisduval, 1852)

Hesperiidae

Lejogaster tarsata Meigen, 1822

Syrphidae

Stagmomantis carolina Johannson, 1763

Mantidae

Bombus cullumanus Kirby, 1802

Apidae

Gonospileia munita (Hubner, 1813)

Erebidae