Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106... 169
Corrected data. Not identified → Choristoneura diversana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.
This is not a moth, and mockery. :) But probably is suchChoristoneura diversana
How do you express love, butterfly is very far from the habit :) Hulodes caranea and therefore can not be like that. The structure of the head in general suggests that this is a moth.
But the quality of the butterfly wants the best :(
The defect at the exit from the pupae.
Corrected data. Not identified → Rhodometra sacraria / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.
But as yet the author's comments delete?
Corrected data. Alexandr Zhakov → Andrey Ponomarev.
Corrected data. Alexandr Zhakov → Andrey Ponomarev.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Corrected data. Imago → Female.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Corrected data. Confidently identified → Tentatively identified.
Corrected data. Not identified → Thisanotia chrysonuchella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.
I agree :)
I think that's genital animals, but the intensity of the picture is more at Chloroplaga nygmia, can be inaccurate.
Corrected data. Not identified → Ischyja inferna / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
200% not Hulodes caranea, genus and probably another subfamily. :))) If the scoop :))
I agree with Messrs :)))
Corrected data. Not identified → Oroplema oyamana / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.
Corrected data. Imago → Female.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Corrected data. Imago → Female.
Corrected data. Imago → Female.
Corrected data. Imago / Andrey Ponomarev → Female / Vlad Proklov.
Corrected data. Imago → Female.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Aphomia sociella / Confidently identified / Male / Alexandr Zhakov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Sympis rufibasis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
It's definitely not Dysaethria lilacina, do not meet either one image or in a book or on Web sites, it shows. Similar, yes, and confused straightened copies and photos easy to understand the rest of Basil. :))
Butterfly matches the image Phazaca kosemponicola but Basil writes that only Taiwan, then we have to look at thePhazaca leucocera
and I have the same opinion, there are only three species of this genus.
during the evening I see what I can :)
I almost got involved Vasily :))). I looked that over look like Prochoreutis sehestediana, wanted to put in the definition, but to be safe to refresh the screen. :))) Irina has already identified. :)))
Corrected data. Not identified → Prochoreutis sehestediana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Lycaena thersamon / Confidently identified / Female / Fedor Ovechkin.
And I watched it in Corydalis :))
Corrected data. Not identified → Oreta pulchripes / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Oreta pulchripes / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Hulodes caranea / Confidently identified / Female / Dmitriy Pozhogin.
Corrected data. Not identified → Achaea serva / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.
Corrected data. Not identified → Cechenena lineosa / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.
Corrected data. Not identified → Cechenena lineosa / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.
The pattern looks quite similar, the wing shape is different.
Corrected data. Not identified → Asota kinabaluensis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.
Corrected data.
Corrected data. Not identified → Eupithecia icterata / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.
Corrected data. Not identified → Eupithecia icterata / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.
Corrected data. Not identified → Eupithecia icterata / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.
Next page