Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105... 169
Corrected data. Alexander Belousov → Sergei Kotov.
Corrected data. Alexander Belousov → Alexandr Zhakov.
Corrected data. Alexander Belousov → Alexandr Zhakov.
Corrected data. Alexander Belousov → Basil Sergienko.
Corrected data. Alexander Belousov → Basil Sergienko.
Corrected data. Not identified → Udea orbicentralis / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.
Very similar :)))
Corrected data. Alexander Belousov → Alexandr Zhakov.
Corrected data. Alexander Belousov → Alexandr Zhakov.
Corrected data. Alexander Belousov → Basil Sergienko.
Corrected data. Alexander Belousov → Basil Sergienko.
Alexander, on mobiole you probably put two kinds of pictures, but as he wrote Sergienko, according to Kostiuk, these species have yet to describe, they do not have names :) :)))
Vladimir, you're right about everything. Without knowing the species is not possible to determine how many photos already have and go whether the point in the job. Angle is very bad from all sides, a butterfly on it as does not identify and plot no. Remove really is not necessary, if you want to make it an administrator. Butterfly defective out of the chrysalis.
And what is a valuable point of discovery? Moscow region. More than 30 photographs and even Narofominsky area is. But even if the point is, why two photographs, one instance in this state. You please do not get me wrong, we are in the light of the new requirements, considering options for the photos, and your as an example.
What is interesting picture?
Udea some sort, or something very close.
It is not Scoparia, is another subfamily.
Confuse, but there are, though not seen such great :)
Without the underside, so be it sp., Walking is certainly Carcharodus alceae. but it is not on the grounds and by intuition, and it sometimes brings. :)))
Corrected data. Confidently identified → Tentatively identified.
Corrected data. Not identified → Phazaca leucocera / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Phazaca leucocera / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.
Corrected data. Andrey Ponomarev → Basil Sergienko.
I do not agree, there is no concept, but the information is there, pale colored individuals (+ to rubbing), and of geography. It is this picture, I would be left in one group. :))
Now, as it should be :) Vladimir, the future is not necessary in the column under the species name, write the name of the species, what are you doing in his office, not fixed in time and can not see the moderators.If you define the form, or you have a suggestion of his species belonging write in the "comments" are seen moderating and there is time, which is important for determining priority.
Corrected data. Vladimir Deryabin → Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Vladimir, you specify the name of the species is not in the box, on the Basil also defined it :), but was not sure. Or sign you put down today after confirmation on lepiforum.de?
Corrected data. Not identified → Carcharodus alceae / Confidently identified / Vladimir Deryabin.
Corrected data. Not identified → Amphipyra berbera / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Amphipyra berbera / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.
Shamil that was the sense in so many photos of one track, specify the age of caterpillars molt or time :) well, and the time necessary to resolve the question :) must specify the date of capture and females from laying eggs. While the female is very ragged.
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Archips rosana / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Archips rosana / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.
Yes, it departed. About det. did not understand the label is not visible :)))
I V.Sergienko and converges on Phazaca leucocera.
I'm saying if I was flying, then 50 to 50, even inaccurate to put impossible, but if you really need :)))
The imprecise, can be still an option Epinotia cinereana, if there was no option "inaccurately" would be accurate. :)))
Corrected data. Confidently identified → Tentatively identified.
Corrected data. Not identified → Epinotia nisella / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Epinotia cinereana → Epinotia nisella.
Corrected data. Not identified → Epinotia cinereana / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.
Photography itself is normal, but a copy, you must see for yourself. If you would like to confirm the identification of the tracks, it is better to believe in the word, than to have this confirmation, and on both sides. I correctly understand your actions, but it does not decorate the site (but that's just my personal opinion).
Corrected data. Andrey Ponomarev → Vlad Proklov.
Corrected data. Andrey Ponomarev → Vlad Proklov.
Comment author is not correct. Nikita closet, as I understand it, on the assumption expressed by caterpillars :))) And here is an image of a butterfly. :)) And very far from perfect :(
Corrected data. Vasiliy Feoktistov → Alexander Boldyrev.
Corrected data. Vasiliy Feoktistov → Alexander Boldyrev.
Corrected data. Not identified → Crambus pascuella / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
And I am about this :))), although the network looked after, there are such. :))
Corrected data. Not identified → Choristoneura diversana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.
News
- 12.10.2024: Fixed sorting/ordering errors (Gallery and Catalog sections)
- 10.10.2024: We fixed bad situation with photo captions for insect species that are not yet in the website database
- 31.08.2024: Первые итоги интеграции/переноса/дублирования Молбиола и Инсекты
New photos (19.10.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 19:36, E. Shcherbakov: Acrididae sp., может быть Ailopus s...
- 13:24, P. Khramov: Not identified → Pseudozizeeria mah...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Meantime in Japan
- Meanwhile, at the "Reptilium"
- 20th International Insect Fair in Moscow (Russia, October 2023)
- Bug hotels: the City of London meets special guests
