Pages: 1 ...564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572... 629
No one offers to sign with your first and last name without fail. You can just use nicknames, with the area of interest as a characteristic (as it is now on the forum). In my opinion, it is not the list itself that is more important, but the location of entomologists.And, besides, is the possibility of repeating that precedent excluded now, without any map, by some other actor?Everything is ...
"House" of the bagworm butterfly-PsychidaeFor " Excuse me, but what is it?" there is a topic: Classification of insects -> Who is it? http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showforum=53Every Russian speaker distinguishes between "who" and"what"! A "house" is an inanimate object. I'm interested in the BEHAVIOR in this case: WHO DID THIS? Here above is also a "nut job". And I suggested something ...
Who is it? 10 mmTranscarpathian lowland. 27.VII.2011 Phymatodes pusillus, I think IMHO Hylotrupes bajulus is rickety a bit.In deep pardon! Obmishurilsya! Fornax13 is absolutely right, here is the confirmation: http://www.zin.ru/Animalia/Coleoptera/eng/hylbajdk.htm
Can you tell me if: confused: there are any traps along the way for night butterflies? It is desirable that you can do it yourself. If there is a photo, throw a description on the forum or on the soap tyomka@lianet.ru[Here are a few images of my lepidoptera traps I have used over the past 42 years]
, "dried specimen" (a butterfly specimen from the collection as opposed to a live one)?Probably you can write a pinned instance-pinned specimen
I can order dry stuff. I'll charge you money for the delivery and search for the right insects. I'm currently in Malaysia and will be in Thailand in a few days. I'll be in Moscow in a week.
No comments from Vlad yet, so the shot goes to Xanthorhoe quadrifasciata now. Will correct it, if needed.
Proctos, thanks for the list. The number of features is impressive. Still, there is so much data to dig up...
Not so lately the system of shot dates was reconstructed, so now we can see just "1977" year, with no details...
Cicadetta montana is known from the vicinity of St. Petersburg, but only locally - on the Duderhof heights. This year, their exuviae were collected there by colleagues in early summer. Where it came from there is another question. Either it is a relic of the Holocene optimum, or an introduced one (under Catherine II, trees from the Carpathians were planted there). But it is very far from Okhta to ...