Pages: 1 ...376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384... 627
Коллеги, знаю, что статус таксона двоякий - кто видом считает, кто подвидом Agrodiaetus damone pljushtchi (Lukhtanov et Budashkin, 1993). ну все равно хотелось бы услышать мнения за и против, особенно от спецов по Lycaenidaeс публикацией ...
Public part of collections: http://lepidoptera.ru/specimenLoading instances from the personal account on the site (you need to log in to your acc on the site first): http://lepidoptera.ru/usercabThe nearest update is a link to points on the Google Maps map.Option for all insects, not just butterflies-approximately by February.
Yes is probably not necessary. And I do not pokupal.V Seitz library a few pictures for memories of it did.
Good result: did not expect :) And beguiled dimorphism Godonela avitusaria: http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-11/Macariini/macariini_6_8.php
Georgia, Akhalkalaki region, July.Could it be Pieris mannii? Disconcertingly, the underparts are very yellow, almost like those of P. ergane, but the ergane lacks a black spot on the forewings below.
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Godonela avitusaria / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Godonela avitusaria / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Calliteara pseudabietis - Far view, in Europe it is not :) Red tail have it in the shade at the bottom of the picture :)
Corrected data. Diehlea tumida / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov → Diehlea ducalis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Diehlea tumida / Imago / Vasiliy Feoktistov → Diehlea ducalis / Female / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Diehlea tumida / Imago / Vasiliy Feoktistov → Diehlea ducalis / Female / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Ornithospila submonstrans / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Ornithospila submonstrans / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
No doubt there :) For referenceOrnithospila lineata, referred to the moths of borneo in the "Habitat preference" : http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/85_GEOMETROIDEA/04_GEOMETRIDAE/07_Geometrinae/22_Ornithospila/Ornithospila%20lineata/Ornithospila%20lineata.htm A completely different appearance.
http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/90_NOCTUOIDEA/02_EREBIDAE/08_SCOLIOPTERYGINAE/Rusicada/Rusicada%20combinans/Rusicada%20combinans.htm
Corrected data. Not identified → Monodecus capillatus / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Monodecus capillatus / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Calyciphora nephelodactyla / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Peter, not much in the news topic, but the theme of the last kommentariya- some species are not illustrated because there were doubts about the photos. You've got an agreement with Andrei http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/35588 was definitely on the photos from a third-party resources. It has all unnecessary and can be removed up everything to illustrate? Andrew or until such leave of comments?
If Peter believes that the pull of insects in general, as the minmum beetles supported by two hands - yet it is my group in which more than a butterfly that I was more interested in terms of photography. And the family of ground beetles TB So I am for! And there will be more active participants in no doubt.