Insecta.pro Community

15.10.2011 17:10, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #10872

This is the thing what the caterpillar turned into. I wonder if it should be rather named a cocoon. Pupae still move a little bit while this thing hasn't done since it appeared or I might not have noticed.

28.09.2011 10:41, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #10736

Could anybody, if possible, approve that?

27.09.2011 3:34, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #9488

As for WB, its color hasn't been changed. In nature, on birthworts it was of the same color.

10.09.2011 7:32, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #10039

The food plant on what caterpillars of this species feed (at least, in Botanical garden of the Institute FEB RAS) is Rhamnus ussuriensis.

28.08.2011 4:03, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #10039

Petr, hello! I mistakenly noted month 6 instead of 7, correct that, please. Actually, I shot that with my old Olympus with unstable settings needed to fix every day. I hurriedly set once "6" instead of right "7". I will send you now other shots of this butterfly made with another camera.

21.08.2011 13:07, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #10033

Petr, thanks!

11.04.2011 11:26, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #8487

Petr, hello! Seems, this butterfly is already identified at mine. #6391 shot, Archiearis notha.

31.03.2011 23:33, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #6369

Roman! It's still questionable if it was honeysuckle whatsoever. I'll know it this year. If we meet up this Saturday, I can show you both the site and the tree.

30.03.2011 11:39, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #8271

This species is identified correctly.

26.03.2011 10:09, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #6387

Petr! Why delay? This is also Matov A. Yu.'s identifying. There are only two experts in the Russian Far East Noctuidae in the whole country, and Matov is one of these two. Got his "yes" to the authors's identifying and work place. You can check it up.

26.03.2011 9:44, Yuri Semejkin: comment on Apatura schrenckii

Is it possible for more detail. And, for obvious data. They can be seen visually? To determine the type of?

24.03.2011 15:19, Yuri Semejkin: comment on Apatura schrenckii

Eugene! However, you have given Russian name and it is not confusing? With regard to the elm, please. Here's Latin. Ulmus pumila and Ulmus laciniata

24.03.2011 13:51, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #7978

Not FEB RASOp, but FEB RAS.

24.03.2011 13:23, Yuri Semejkin: comment on Apatura schrenckii

Hello! It's about food supply - OSTRYA CARPINIFOLIA. As I was trying to figure out a tree in the Primorsky region does not grow. I'll ask more botanists BPI FEB RAS, but they probably say the same thing. So, once the tree is not proizrostaet, -to habitats Donaciinae Schrenk, it can not be their food supply.Oviposition occurs on elm, as well as (for an Internet data), - to serdtselistnom ...

24.03.2011 10:58, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #6484

This is not my name and Chistyakov either. My album has no any file named like this. So, either it's some technical bug (not mine), or the human, as it's called today, factor.

24.03.2011 9:30, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #6484

Pardon, I seemed to confuse something uploading images. Checked out my folder and found different name, Epatolmis caesarea.

24.03.2011 9:21, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #6484

As for bug. Chistyakov examined this caterpillar with me nearby. He called it Arctiidae. Latin name was also given by him. There was also one more entomologist with us. Since I'm not one (and there happen to be some contradictions in this "entoworld"), so I applied to this image the info about author's identifying. Not to confuse who identified that first. By the way, there are some more ...

24.03.2011 9:03, Yuri Semejkin: comment on Limenitis camilla

Dissemination: Why only the European part? While the Primorsky Krai, -Aziatskaya part of Russia.

22.03.2011 13:27, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #6370

Hi there! The third stage of this caterpillar you identified as #6372: Caligula boisduvalii. So why this one, the first stage, and further also are undetermined? This is the same caterpillar.

21.03.2011 23:27, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #6386

Zanclognatha fumosa. Identified by Biology Ph.D. Candidate Matov. A. Yu., ZIN RAS.

21.03.2011 14:02, Yuri Semejkin: comment on Wagimo signata

Clear. Thank Evgeniy1

21.03.2011 11:44, Yuri Semejkin: comment on Wagimo signata

Where did the word east? In an Internet everywhere marshmallow oak, without any prefixes Eastern

10.03.2011 12:12, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #6437

Got a consult. There is such answer. That's nothing but Neptis pryeri.

08.03.2011 14:11, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #6383

As for "veggies". Mostly this is Mongolian Oak, rarely it's Quercus dentata.

08.03.2011 0:36, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #6370

Caligula jonasii is a Japanese species. We have none such. Seems to be same Caligula boisduvalii, before the first molting.

07.03.2011 11:51, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #1475

This species is identified correctly.

07.03.2011 11:50, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #1473

This species is identified correctly.

02.03.2011 23:29, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #6387

Niphonyx segregata. Identified by Matov. A. Yu.

27.02.2011 4:51, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #1025

This species is identified correctly.

23.02.2011 3:11, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #6383

Hi there! Want to ask experts. Please, explain, if possible, why this Japonica lutea is colored in such a way? In past three years I met only two Japonica lutea of such color. Common color is like on #6384 shot. Yury.