Insecta.pro Community
Epholca arenosa (BUTLER, 1878)
Ok !
I also looked at the DV Identifier. I agree with Ira where she talks about a straight line http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/28254 If you look at this picture and draw a straight line through the points, then it is still directed to the rear corner, although the ZK is not visible here. Ira did not write about P. teleius (about a straight line), so I will add ( Not everyone has a DV Determinant) that ...
Alexander! Yes, there are doubts. So you did the right thing.
Alexander ! Then reschedule it. I started the discussion here with a complaint to the admin. How many breakfasts can you feed, (tomorrow, then, there is no time) How long do you all decide nothing in the office, just talk. I don't even know why almost everything got up. ? Due to technical limitations, or not wanting to do something. Can someone answer ? In order for the site to develop, it must ...
Alexander ! Bugs have nothing to do with it, well, I don't like them, don't get distracted by them. Switch to lepidoptera, and then only butterflies will appear on the screen. The site's features allow you to make selective viewing for any squad. The bad thing is that the site doesn't develop for any of the teams. Even moderators can't change the situation, and suggestions don't pass. And who, ...
Speak for Phengaris kurentzovi Sibatani, Saigusa & Hirowatari, 1994
Cupido argiades (Pallas, 1771)
[253] should be deleted. It duplicates [ 257 ]. And all this is because Peter has not yet put things in order, in particular, in the LIST of REFERENCES. How much can I talk about this, or do I not need any information ? In general, it seems that people are throwing pictures on the site less and less often, probably out of habit. See the case for the "sunset" goes.
Let's transfer to Aphrophora major Uhler, 1896, but to the inaccurate ones. K. A. Ostapenko was identified by the FEFU Zoomuseum (Vladivostok). As he says, in this particular case, without genitals is not more accurate to say.
Ivan ! This is not a question for me.. I practically don't do bug detection.
Probably some kind of Adalia (judging by the edges of the elytra/ An unsuccessful picture, there will not be an exact definition. Therefore, it is probably better to delete it, so as not to clog up the site. The Adalia variant was put forward by a professional who deals specifically with cows.
Pieris brassicae (Linnaeus, 1758)
Somehow I have not yet met specialists who identify bumblebees from images. Any definition will be just guessing. So Irek, if you want to know the exact view, then take a picture of the object, then catch it and take it to a specialist for determination, so that he can look under the binocular
Vanessa cardui (Linnaeus, 1758)
Vanessa cardui (Linnaeus, 1758)
I went to Chistyakov Yu. A. BPI FEB RAS. Its preliminary definition is that it is Lamellocossus terebrus Den. et Schiff. For an accurate determination, an imago is needed, and possibly a genital preparation, since there is a similar species. On the site this species is called Acossus terebra (Den. et Schiff, 1775)
Oxyporus procerus Kraatz, 1879 ?
Can. I'm looking here in the search engine red caterpillars DV. I didn't find anything with the specification. I hope for pupation more, then the time to search more specifically will appear.
Sasha, you may be right about the view, I found such a picture on the Internet and haven't looked for much else yet. Taken with a flash, the color is slightly shifted, in the original it is closer to cherry. I took the caterpillar for cultivation, but whether it will work or not is a question. Perhaps it is necessary to feed, although it seems to be out of season. Crawling on the ground, and ...
I would also say that Argynnis adippe is here. On molbil, http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=193914&st=50 , referring to Korshunov, they write that Fabriciana xipe does not exist.
For now, I took note of the information.
I'm not sure. If you compare it with http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/60346, there are differences. First of all, if you look at this picture, the general appearance catches your eye - the butterfly is more massive, wide. And secondly, the apex of the wings is greatly expanded, specifically curved, which is a characteristic feature for some species.
In my opinion, this is the common Acropteris iphiata (Guenee, 1857). In Thailand, there is.
Coleoptera ? Got out of the mushrooms.
Thecla betulae (Linnaeus, 1758)
Eugene ! In my opinion, on the prsp. there is no dotted line. I brought the increase in length to about 17 thousand pixels and saw nothing. I deleted the image, because the weight per gigabyte exceeded.
There is no bug. . This is from the previous image in the editor enlarged. The beetle was small, no more than 5 mm long
Eugene ! In general, this option is muddied. I deleted the previous version #60089 as a smaller one. The recording is still there, if you don't mind. You can also put the number #60089, otherwise it fell out.
I already uploaded it. In principle, you can increase a little bit
Top or bottom ?
Pieris rapae (Linnaeus, 1758) ? Smaller size than P. brassicae.
Paratorna cuprescens ? I didn't find anything else with similar bandages. But there are also big doubts about this option.
Pontia callidice (Hubner, 1800) ?
I quite admit it. This was not determined by a specialist. This is a private collection given to the museum. Some samples have no labels at all. Not even the country is known. On the one hand, I would like to know the names, but on the other hand, given the complexity, do I need to discount them on the site ? The photos were taken by my wife when she was there on a business trip, but she doesn't ...
All Eugene ! Further already floats.
Eugene ! Will that work ?"
All right, Alexander !
Okay, I'll give it a try. But probably tomorrow.
Alexander ! If you put it under my responsibility, I won't object. If that would be my mistake. The determination was made based on the analysis of Internet images. If I can find out more, I'll let you know here. I chose between 2 species T. recompta and T. comptaria. Only they, according to the determinant, fly to Primorye until the end of September. For the rest, the summer season ends in ...
Eugene ! The beetle is still with me, if it gives anything, I can reshoot and reset the vertical picture of the top today, or you can add a bunch of vertical and bottom . Shoot ?
Maybe SO, maybe NOT. I would not be surprised that no one knows this today.
Timandra comptaria Walker, [1863]
Well, at least let it be so. Still, it's nice to deal with a specialist who knows what to watch, where to watch and honestly talks about the possibility of accurate or not determination. And then it happens, you ask a person, and he answers you with a bunch of links to different sites and he sees only what is written there. Thank you Evgeny for the definition !
I stand in solidarity with Evgeny. Alexander came and brought clarity with his attentive eye. Well done!
Based on the remains of fragments of bandages, partly on the shape of the body, I believe that this is Furcula bicuspis (Borkhausen, 1790)
The question remained open. The expected definition is questionable. Base; If viewed here http://www.jpmoth.org/Notodontidae/Micromelalopha_troglodyta.html the coloring is completely different. You can go through and see Irina's link."The samples on it are generally reddish. Now let's look at the 2 samples presented. Yes, they are not so hot, but having color remnants of the original color still ...
So I don't have any other options yet. Let's wait, maybe there will be opinions.
Evgeny, I don't insist. The 2nd image shows the remains of pinkish scales. There are not so many butterflies with a pinkish color, but the moth and moth are eliminated.It remains, and what remains ? Offer your options.
Lymantria mathura aurora Butler, 1877 ?
News
- 17.11.2024: Импортированы и переведны последние свежие сообщения с форума. Обновлена страница «О сайте».
- 11.11.2024: The Community/Forum section has become more convenient
- 11.11.2024: Improved scaling of images in the Forum/Community
New photos (21.11.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 22:20, P. Khramov: Lampyridae / Tentatively identified...
- 21:35, A. M.: Sure. It's done. (Sorry to say I ha...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Entomological seminar in Moscow on November 13
- Meanwhile, at the "Reptilium"
- The insects exhibition in Kotlas
- Neither fish nor flesh, or what butterflies actually prefer
