Insecta.pro Community
Leptura ( s. str.) annnularis annularis Fabricius, 1801. Determined by: Danilevsky M. L. Institute of Problems of Ecology and Evolution of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Moscow).
Does it look like the false cocoons of flies ? I put it down as a pupa, but maybe it makes sense for such cases to add the term puparia to the development stage ?
Larentiinae. Apparently Xanthorhoe sp
It is similar to Homona magnanima Diakonoff 1948, but according to the catalog it is not found in Primorye. According to some pictures of the Internet there is a similarity with Archips sp
Oedemera amurensis Heyden, 1884 .In the database no.
Maria raised an interesting topic. Although I am not an expert, I will say the following. Not everything is so simple in this matter. Here is a site for forage plants http://www.nic.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/warp/food-plants-b.html Taraxacum is not included in the list. I looked it up in the DB definitions. In vol. 5., part 1., p. 525 there is a reference to dandelion. And in Vol. 5, part 3., p. ...
Neptis philyra Menetries, 1859
Narrow wing Ischnomera abdominalis (Heyden, 1887). In the database no.
Lamprodila (Palmar) virgata (Motsch., 1860) In the database no
I agree !
In my opinion, this is Ectropis excellens (Butler, 1884)? Already well flown.
Yes, in my opinion, the usual Angerona prunaria (Linnaeus, 1758)
Eysarcoris gibbosus Jakovlev, 1904 there are no
Tenthredinidae ?
Chionodes viduella ( Fabricius, 1794)
Autosticha modicella (Christoph, 1882) ?
Rod used to be in the in-ones given. But I do not insist. In the family, because the family.
Argynnis paphia (Linnaeus, 1758)
Strangalomorpha tenuis Solsky, 1873 ?
Pentatoma japonica ( Distant, 1882)
Gerris insularis Motschulsky, 1866. In the base there.
Indeed one. And what these things mean? In the other. Regions that do not have albinism or what? We only white, etc. Is not seen and can not be recognized. Okay, maybe someone will interpret over time. Let's go back to this picture. Ivan, I'm not particularly delved ladybugs, but it seems you have to decide whether or not to transfer.
Dropped shot Calvia desemguttata .http: //insecta.pro/ru/gallery/57965 Definition in due time was made by Andrei Ukrainian ZIN. For a species characterized by the presence on nadkr. 5 slightly visible white spots, which often disappear. (To insects of the Far East of the USSR., T. 3, ch. 2). As for this image, on the basis of the foregoing, I probably agree with Ivan, that picture is not Calvia ...
Peter! Take away please Old. Not the kind of loaded.
Also apparently sawfly. He sits on klёne zelenokorom.
Basil Good! And if we will see the number of pairs prolegs, you can identify? The larva is mine.
Sawflies?
Atara arata (Bremer, 1861)
Psyllids or psylla. Now they are considered as a unit Psillinea suborder Homoptera, although some overseas persistently carry them to the order Hemiptera So I for detachment Homoptera, and fellow moderators or curator determined themselves.
Rhopaloscelis unifasciatus Blessig, 1873
Rhopaloscelis unifasciatus Blessig, 1873
Agelasa nigriceps Motsch., 1860
Oedecnema dubia F? In the database there.
Xanthorhoe biriviata (Borkhausen, 1794)
Now it called Volucella bivitta. Earlier, in the Russian Far East Opredelitel insect was called V. coreana.
Erynnis montanus (Bremer, 1861)
Celastrina ladonides ?
Yes, it is better not to move to the exact C. ladonides. And as http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/29138, I do not see any reason to transfer pictures and believe in the true definition of inaccurate looked. By the way the name of this butterfly has undergone a series of metamorphoses Celastrina sugitanii (Matsumura, 1919). C. sugitanii phellodendron M. M. Omelko, 1987 = C. phellodendron M. M. ...
Out of the base. Pseudanostirus ecarinatus (Stepanov, 1930)
It would be necessary to look more for C. ladonides? The truth at C. ladonides no such top as pictured in the figure. I at least could not be found in the internet. So speak up ....
Bombus cullumanus serrisquama Morawitz, 1888. http://bombus.nsu.ru/index.php/component/bmb/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=5&showgal=gal_serrisquama This site bumblebees. In Russia, they are, as they say on the site 90 species.
Celastrina ladonides? Small, with a thumb nail. Top of bright blue with a purple tinge.
This is a natural color element. Gonepteryx aspasia, young butterfly limonnits typical yellow-white-green coloring, and wintered become such a gray-brown-crimson-in-flecked,
Alexander ! I do not define it ..
Good
For me, too. Have you ever seen something like that, but now something is not found. And it is necessary to check!
Alexander ! According to the sign =. . I quote from the book Milliere 1879: 139 (Stenia); South, 1901: 462 (N. maculalis); From the record shows, who, when described, and so put an equal sign, and asked a question. But independent of these two species or something synonymous?, Hard to say.
Pieris melete? First generation.
Gelechiidae. A genus and species it would be necessary to check Faristenia quercivora Ponomarenco, 1991?
I agree. I thought one thing, and others wrote.
News
- 17.11.2024: Импортированы и переведны последние свежие сообщения с форума. Обновлена страница «О сайте».
- 11.11.2024: The Community/Forum section has become more convenient
- 11.11.2024: Improved scaling of images in the Forum/Community
New photos (21.11.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 22:20, P. Khramov: Lampyridae / Tentatively identified...
- 21:35, A. M.: Sure. It's done. (Sorry to say I ha...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Entomological seminar in Moscow on November 13
- Meanwhile, at the "Reptilium"
- The petition in defense of biological nomenclature
- To the butterflies of Peru
