Insecta.pro Community
Leaning towards the variant Lymantria mathura aurora Butler, 1877 ?
>>>>
If you take into account the article given by Ira on her page http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/42598 , then it is necessary to change the view to Oreta paki (Inoue, 1964)
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
If you take into account the article given by Ira on her page http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/42598 , then it is necessary to change the view to Oreta paki (Inoue, 1964)
I would say that in all 3 images Comostola subtiliaria (Bremer, 1864)is
Eugene! Thank you for making things clear!
Eugene! I usually don't identify beetles. I send them to A. Lobanov for example. Here is the top and bottom http://www.zin.ru/Animalia/Coleoptera/rus/seme2013.htm The species is not indicated on the website. I don’t remember where the definition of the species came from now. Evgeniy, follow the link, maybe the 2 pictures will clarify something. Of course, it's possible to try to get through ...
I agree with the author of the pictures, this is Apeira syringaria (LINNAEUS, 1758)
Eugene ! Apparently, this was one of the reasons why a number of insects from different orders ( not just beetles) were not included in the qualifiers and even catalogues. In the new ones, it will probably be only when it is.
Indeed, there is no Nicrophorus concolor in the DV determinant. But there is in the Internet. In particular excellent scans on the Zinovsky website http://www.zin.ru/Animalia/Coleoptera/rus/nicconsi.htm The beetles were caught in the Spassky and Khasansky districts of Primorsky Krai.
If you're sure, move it.
Eugene! And one and a half hundred, is that so many species were shoot?
Indeed, then move it to Hypenodes humidalis or delete any of them.
Nola sp ?
Aphrophoridae sp.
Eulithis testata (Linnaeus, 1761)
Sasha, I have uploaded a description of both species here. Pay attention to the description of the hindwing.In cases where they are visible, there are no problems with species defining. I don’t understand about stigma, is it possible that both species may not have it? Or weakly expressed ? If so, I would like an explanation how to identify the species without seeing the hind wings. ...
>>>>
Pseudoips sylpha (Butler, 1879) ?
Would you say it's Comibaena delicata ? But I'm confused by the lack of 2 black dots on the lane. kr., exactly the same as on the back. krl. All Internet images have dots on krl Lane.
Transfer it !
I agree, move it.
Alexander ! Objection accepted, all right this is Paracolax trilinealis. Move it.
Paracolax trifasciata Was Identified By Matov A. Yu. ZIN RAS. This type of database doesn't exist.
Yes, probably to Collita. Kol Dubatolov refers here.
And what do we not transfer to the genus ? You can go to the genus.
OK Alexander, let's leave it at that. There really isn't enough data.
Maybe ? There is a similar picture in Kirpichnikova's book and it is given there under the name Udea sp. I can throw off .....
Alexander! I don't have a source describing Arctiinae.So I will not object, besides it is not clear what color the rear. krl. The view is given on the basis of images of the Internet. More specifically, it's like the shape of a butterfly (its outline) so is the direction of the veins appearing through the wings going from top to bottom and from the right, to the left.
Ps. Larva.
Yes, no Vasily ! There is no such species as Eriocampa dorpatica in the Far East . Rod in general, probably can be left, similar in any case. But with a view.....There are 5 species of this genus in Russia, and 2 species in the Russian Far East. These are Eriocampa albipes Matsumura, 1912 and E. mitsukurii Rohwer, 1910. Both of these species are in the Khabarovsk Territory, but who of them is who ...
Acria emarginella (Donovan, 1806) ?
Excellent Eugene !
Evgeny, then there are no questions! And so that no one else has them, it would be great to post spread specimens with a visible distinctive feature. Moreover, there is not a single specimen with a upper and underside on the website for both species.
Epione vespertaria Linnaeus, 1767
The article Korb S. K. 2014 Designation of the lectotype Pararge epaminondas Lang, 1884 and Lasiommata epimenides var. epaminondas Staudinger, 1887 (Lepidoptera: Satyridae ) is published in the Amur Zoological Journal VI (3) . pp. 282-283. In this report, the lectotype of Kirinia epaminondas ( Lang, 1884) and Kirinia epaminondas ( Staudinger, 1887) are designated and represented as one and the ...
Ira! The link is an attempt at an approximate translation in Google. Summary of other authors on the European View (Europe). And then let's say I ask a question. Does it make sense to compare these samples with the European species? ..... dedicated to the designation of the lectotype, the first description of the species epaminondas. The original description of the species is actually called a ...
Follow the given links to the photo. What can I say, the point of view has not changed yet . By Korbu: -His link to a summary of other authors on the European species, or maybe a subspecies ? How it is combined with other types. ? No, I do not mind the possibility of determining these 2 DV types from the images, but based on the DV determinant and the Kurentsov determinant. It is somehow doubtful ...
I would like to clarify the question about two OTHER species of Kirinia, namely K. epimenides and K. epaminondas. I spent half a day comparing images of these species on the Internet, including this site. And I found almost no difference between them. Then I turned to the official source "Determinant of insects of the Far Eastern Federal District of Russia Volume 5, part 5". The difference is ...
Eugene! Here are 3 of your pictures and all are identified as Kirinia epaminondas. And why this particular species, and not Kirinia epimenides (Menetries, 1859)? And all the definitions are defined as accurate!
Male Kirinia epaminondas (Staudinger, 1887)?
Male Kirinia epaminondas (Staudinger, 1887)?
Here with a different color form.
Pangrapta lunulata Stertz, 1915 ?
Pangrapta lunulata Stertz, 1915 ?
And here is the Seaside sample !
I'm not sure, but as a variant of Hydrelia nisaria (Christoph, 1881)?
Hemithea aestivaria Hübner, 1789 ?
News
- 17.11.2024: Импортированы и переведны последние свежие сообщения с форума. Обновлена страница «О сайте».
- 11.11.2024: The Community/Forum section has become more convenient
- 11.11.2024: Improved scaling of images in the Forum/Community
New photos (21.11.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 22:20, P. Khramov: Lampyridae / Tentatively identified...
- 21:35, A. M.: Sure. It's done. (Sorry to say I ha...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Entomological seminar in Moscow on November 13
- The insects exhibition in Kotlas
- The petition in defense of biological nomenclature
- New website rubric: Butterflies and music
