Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327... 629

20.08.2015 11:10, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #38828

Corrected data. Araschnia levana f. levana → Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:10, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #38827

Corrected data. Araschnia levana f. levana → Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:10, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #32614

Corrected data. Araschnia levana f. levana → Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:10, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #30301

Corrected data. Araschnia levana f. levana → Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:09, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #14799

Corrected data. Araschnia levana f. levana → Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:09, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #39102

Corrected data. Araschnia levana f. levana → Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:09, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #30298

Corrected data. Araschnia levana f. levana → Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:09, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #30297

Corrected data. Araschnia levana f. levana → Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:09, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #29937

Corrected data. Araschnia levana f. levana → Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:09, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #28859

Corrected data. Araschnia levana f. levana → Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:09, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #28126

Corrected data. Araschnia levana f. levana → Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:09, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #22047

Corrected data. Araschnia levana f. levana → Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:09, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #11838

Corrected data. Araschnia levana f. levana → Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:09, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #11836

Corrected data. Araschnia levana f. levana → Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:09, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #11835

Corrected data. Araschnia levana f. levana → Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:09, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9376

Corrected data. Araschnia levana f. levana → Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:08, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9278

Corrected data. Araschnia levana f. levana → Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:08, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7768

Corrected data. Araschnia levana f. levana → Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:08, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7761

Corrected data. Araschnia levana f. levana → Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:08, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #2894

Corrected data. Araschnia levana f. levana → Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:08, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #21954

Corrected data. Araschnia levana f. levana → Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:08, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #20567

Corrected data. Araschnia levana f. levana → Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 10:12, Shamil Murtazin: comment on photo #42266

I used to think that it Pandemis =)

20.08.2015 9:54, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #16492

Corrected data. Andrey Ponomarev → Vlad Proklov.

20.08.2015 8:57, Shamil Murtazin: comment on 2 photo galleries online: basic and additional. Discussion

Peter, I do not understand what there kollazhik draw. I mean, you can just substantively discuss the numbers of photos. Or do something else waiting for? Drew plate as an example. Just a person perceives the information not as a string, ielook at the photos does not slide in line with the text, and if you do not start to allocate one line, it is likely that the user will not even notice them. ...

19.08.2015 22:30, Daria Milkova: comment on photo #41736

Basil, I hope!

19.08.2015 22:10, Leon Ortlieb: comment on photo #42291

Not a healthy interest in sex ... (Spider looks out from under the sheet).

19.08.2015 17:51, Mihail Nyzhnikov: comment on photo #42287

This species is identified correctly.

19.08.2015 16:41, Peter Khramov: comment on Now you can attach a photo, not only to species but also subspecies, as well as supra taxa

Different people need different sample. And another opportunity to hurt nobody. As for the technical part - the sample well subspecies check glitches in the binding. Imprecisely to the genus and family can be exactly the same as before the species. Like, that's the kind of, but not 100% sure.Not with regards to the theme - as I wrote above, the tree taxa need to rectify, this is no argument ...

19.08.2015 16:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #32697

Corrected data. Imago → Female.

19.08.2015 15:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Helotropha leucostigma

Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 31—39 mm. Flight time: No formalized data → July, August.

19.08.2015 15:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #11186

Corrected data. Andrey Ponomarev → Vlad Proklov.

19.08.2015 15:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #11185

Corrected data. Andrey Ponomarev → Vlad Proklov.

19.08.2015 15:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #11162

Corrected data. Andrey Ponomarev → Vlad Proklov.

19.08.2015 15:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5246

Corrected data. Andrey Ponomarev → Vlad Proklov.

19.08.2015 15:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5245

Corrected data. Andrey Ponomarev → Vlad Proklov.

19.08.2015 15:03, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #10577

Corrected data.

19.08.2015 14:59, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #28893

Just now some changes appointment of the second line ("Update"). Now, to write: 1. Shapes, morphs, etc. (as before) 2.Subspecies only if the site is not yet wound up appropriate subspecies, and therefore it is impossible to snap a photo directly (before the subspecies does not tied, so always wrote subtypes, regardless of whether the desired site). Do you agree?

19.08.2015 14:56, Peter Khramov: comment on Ideopsis

Thanks for the tip, fixed.

19.08.2015 14:06, Peter Khramov: comment on Improvements "galleries" on the pages of taxa

But who and how will note that they are different species? Prog, after all, is unknown, different or not they are different. She knows only that the determination to superspecies taxon, not to the species, and it adds an automatic "sp".