Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501... 629

04.11.2013 10:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #21706

Underside would be great here :)

04.11.2013 10:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #24168

Moved this to X. crotonis so far. Meh....... Would be great if Alexandr also uploaded the underside of his collection specimen that's already here, could help I think.

04.11.2013 9:50, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #24408

Corrected data. Confidently identified → Tentatively identified.

04.11.2013 9:49, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #24410

Corrected data. Not identified → Amblyptilia acanthadactyla / Tentatively identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

04.11.2013 9:49, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #24409

Corrected data. Not identified → Amblyptilia acanthadactyla / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

04.11.2013 9:48, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #24407

Corrected data. Not identified → Amblyptilia acanthadactyla / Tentatively identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

04.11.2013 9:48, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #24406

Corrected data. Not identified → Amblyptilia acanthadactyla / Tentatively identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

04.11.2013 9:44, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #16972

Corrected data. Not identified → Dichrorampha simpliciana / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.11.2013 9:42, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #13131

Corrected data. Dichrorampha simpliciana / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov → Not identified.

04.11.2013 2:41, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #9488

Nah, that's ok. Just wondered.

04.11.2013 2:09, barry: comment on Distribution of the North American bug Leptoglossus occidentalis in Russia and Ukraine

Here are a couple of these beetles from Kharkiv. We went for a walk in the botanical garden. The nearest coniferous trees from their places of walking are about two hundred meters away. 2.9.2013 and 29.10.2013.Where exactly is it? Can you give us points on the map?

04.11.2013 1:52, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #24363

This one fits most of all Colombian Xylophanes http://www.silkmoths.bizland.com/xtyndaru.htm

04.11.2013 1:27, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #24391

Serious doubts this one is larva.

04.11.2013 1:21, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #9646

DDDDDD

04.11.2013 1:17, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #9645

Change the data similar to the photo 9644

04.11.2013 1:14, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #9644

Corrected data. Not identified → Polygonia c-album / Confidently identified / Igor Sakhno.

04.11.2013 0:56, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #24405

IMHO Heliconius sp.

04.11.2013 0:42, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #21899

Yes.

04.11.2013 0:02, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #24404

Corrected data. Confidently identified → Tentatively identified.

03.11.2013 22:44, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #24082

Corrected data. Not identified → Protambulyx euryalus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.11.2013 21:55, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #24387

That I messed up. Corrected. Sergey, when you ship foty - indicates the floor in the corresponding list of "Stage of development / floor" and not to be clarified to mean ...

03.11.2013 21:17, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #24388

Corrected data. Imago → Female.

03.11.2013 20:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #24240

Corrected data. Confidently identified → Tentatively identified.

03.11.2013 16:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #17135

Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.

03.11.2013 16:33, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13970

Clear. I watch the shooting that surely was one and the same individual or not. If anyone can confirm - Confirm ...

03.11.2013 12:09, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #22032

Thank you, Eugene! I am glad that aglaja I also had in mind in his first assumption) So anything made out of that debate, although the impression was just that - the chaos in all kind Argynnis, not only Fabriciana (well, it is in my opinion not spets a))

03.11.2013 9:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #15121

Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.

03.11.2013 9:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #14806

Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.

03.11.2013 9:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #14805

Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.

03.11.2013 9:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #15696

I postponed it by analogy setim photo: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/15699 there and the author and the region are the same. Alexander rights. Parnas not a band, which can be here, so, "with a light hand" to determine. Even the most ordinary Apollo.

03.11.2013 9:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #18056

Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.

03.11.2013 9:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #17558

Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.

03.11.2013 9:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #16885

Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.

03.11.2013 8:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #8810

Corrected data. Eudonia lacustrata / Vitaly Gumenuk → Scoparia basistrigalis / Dmitry Borisyuk.

03.11.2013 8:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #23589

Corrected data. Not identified → Spalgis epius / Confidently identified / Eugene Karolinskiy.

03.11.2013 0:30, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #16655

Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.

03.11.2013 0:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #16059

Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.

03.11.2013 0:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #16061

Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.

03.11.2013 0:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #16060

Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.

03.11.2013 0:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #16062

Transfer can be: the same shot at Sungaya (at the bottom only colors other Gumenyuk shamans probably): http://insectamo.ru/hete/98-hete/noctuidae/1269-autographa-mandarina

03.11.2013 0:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #14685

We saw Sergei all your confirmation and again they should not be permanently apat: please be considerate. Do not try to impose their personal views, but rather reinforce such arguments (links, etc.).

02.11.2013 22:36, Sergei Kotov: comment on photo #15951

This species is identified correctly.

02.11.2013 22:36, Sergei Kotov: comment on photo #15952

This species is identified correctly.

02.11.2013 22:36, Sergei Kotov: comment on photo #15949

This species is identified correctly.

02.11.2013 22:17, Sergei Kotov: comment on photo #15956

This species is identified correctly.

02.11.2013 22:17, Sergei Kotov: comment on photo #15954

This species is identified correctly.

02.11.2013 22:08, Sergei Kotov: comment on photo #3694

Agree with aforesaid. Couldn't you write it right then for me not to repeat it thrice. I thought you either didn't notice (went back to the third page of comments) or just forgot...