Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76... 80

03.03.2011 6:38, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #6903

Prenesta scyllalis, Walker, 1859.

03.03.2011 6:35, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #6933

Dmitry, If I got it right, this is also Prenesta scyllalis, Walker, 1859.

03.03.2011 6:33, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #6962

The species is added to the database/approved.

03.03.2011 6:27, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #6962

This species is identified correctly.

03.03.2011 6:25, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #6929

The species is added to the database/approved.

03.03.2011 6:24, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #6942

The species is added to the database/approved.

03.03.2011 6:17, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #6942

Shots are nearly twins, is it needed to show both?

03.03.2011 6:16, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #6942

This species is identified correctly.

03.03.2011 6:16, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #6929

This species is identified correctly.

02.03.2011 22:00, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #7010

This species is identified correctly.

02.03.2011 21:52, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #6910

Alexandr! Seems even family is wrong. Actually, recently they tried to add Limoniidae to Brahmaeidae due to a new molecular analysis, http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?act=Attach&type=post&id=104358, but this one is surely something unclear. Also, no Brahmaeidae found yet in the New World: http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-3/brahmaeidae/brahmaeidae.php, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brahmaeidae.

02.03.2011 19:33, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #6941

The species is added to the database/approved.

02.03.2011 19:33, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #6941

Ordishia rutila, Stoll, 1782.

02.03.2011 17:44, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #6974

The species is added to the database/approved.

02.03.2011 17:44, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #6974

Ormetica sypilus (Cramer, 1777).

02.03.2011 16:16, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #7157

The species is added to the database/approved.

02.03.2011 12:19, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #7114

Syngamia florella (Stoll, 1781).

02.03.2011 12:10, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #7157

? Loxophlebia bisigna (Kaye, 1911), nothing more similar.

02.03.2011 11:38, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #6914

Amaxia lepida (Schaus, 1912).

02.03.2011 10:19, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #6069

Dmitry! I've got it in a tightly closed box, lazy to open. Shot that about five years ago (even rather scanned).

02.03.2011 7:25, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #6940

Male.

02.03.2011 7:24, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #6982

The species is added to the database/approved.

02.03.2011 7:24, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #6930

The species is added to the database/approved.

02.03.2011 7:24, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #6930

Male.

02.03.2011 7:20, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #7101

The species is added to the database/approved.

02.03.2011 7:15, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #7101

Cyclopis caecutiens (Hübner, [1821]), Noctuidae.

02.03.2011 7:08, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #6955

The species is added to the database/approved.

02.03.2011 7:08, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #6955

Amaxia lepida (Schaus, 1912)

02.03.2011 6:48, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #6967

Eacles penelope (Cramer, 1775).

02.03.2011 6:45, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #6946

Citheronia hamifera, W.Rothschild, 1907.

02.03.2011 6:42, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #6904

Eacles penelope ♂ (Cramer, 1775).

02.03.2011 6:38, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #7127

The species is added to the database/approved.

02.03.2011 6:35, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #7127

Amphimoea walkeri (Boisduval, [1875]).

02.03.2011 6:33, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #7166

The species is added to the database/approved.

02.03.2011 6:32, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #7166

Manduca albiplaga (Walker, 1856).

02.03.2011 6:30, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #6982

Ascalapha odorata (Linnaeus,1758), worn-out female.

02.03.2011 6:29, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #6930

Ascalapha odorata (Linnaeus, 1758).

02.03.2011 6:27, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #6940

The species is added to the database/approved.

02.03.2011 6:27, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #6940

Ascalapha odorata (Linnaeus, 1758).

02.03.2011 5:53, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #7144

The species is added to the database/approved.

02.03.2011 5:51, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #7144

Automeris liberia (Cramer, 1780) 100% sure. Saw this one with expanded hind wings, shot by Konstantin. But not published there yet, maybe, stuck somewhere.

01.03.2011 19:53, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #5978

Dmitry is right! I digged that and... Petr, move to Papilio heringi, Niepelt, 1924.

28.02.2011 10:03, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #5819

Well, let it be like this then. As for differences between claudina subspecies and also other species, I fully agree.

28.02.2011 9:27, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #6618

? Jodis lactearia, Linnaeus, 1758.

28.02.2011 9:02, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #6615

Odezia atrata, Linnaeus, 1758.

28.02.2011 7:12, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #5978

If Dmitry is sure... I got that right as it was named and with the set caught location. Can't say something more efficient!

27.02.2011 8:36, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #5819

Dmitry, aedon costs much more $ ;) Will try to show underside, ok.

26.02.2011 21:31, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #6222

The species is added to the database/approved.

26.02.2011 21:28, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #6222

Added!

24.02.2011 9:06, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #6383

Yep :) Then the second shot, #6384 is not J. lutea but J. adusta! Colleagues, please, compare a white stripes pattern at the lower part of the hind wings, there: http://szmn.sbras.ru/old/picts/butterfly/Lycaenidae/Japonica_adusta.htm and http://szmn.sbras.ru/old/picts/butterfly/Lycaenidae/Japonica_lutea.htm. And also our photos. Anyway, it's surely silly to do that having one butterfly of every ...