Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75... 80
Gonodonta pyrgo (Cramer, 1777).
The species is added to the database/approved.
This species is identified correctly.
Apatelodes firmiana (Stoll, [1782]), imho, suits best.
The species is added to the database/approved.
This species is identified correctly.
The species is added to the database/approved.
This species is identified correctly.
The species is added to the database/approved.
This species is identified correctly.
? Citheronia hamifera, W.Rothschild, 1907. Species of this genus vary in color much.
The species is added to the database/approved.
Letis occidua male (Linnaeus, 1758).
This species is identified correctly.
Syngamia florella (Stoll, 1781).
Cyclopis caecutiens (Hübner, [1821]).
Dmitry! Wrote a comment but in the morning forgot to send it :) I've got this butterfly to my collection and identified that at the end of the past century when there was no annulata at all :) So, I'm definitely not "upset".
The species is added to the database/approved.
Colobura annulata, Willmott, Constantini & Hall, 2001.
The species is added to the database/approved.
This species is identified correctly.
Colobura annulata, Willmott, Constantini & Hall, 2001.
The species is added to the database/approved.
This species is identified correctly.
Hylesia teratex (Draudt, 1929). Alexandr is right!
The species is added to the database/approved.
Male.
This species is identified correctly.
Well, this also turns out to be Caligula boisduvalii if we take into account Yury's remark about no jonasii in Russian fauna. There is actually only this species in the Catalog, but also japonica, Moore, 1862. It looks absolutely not like japonica caterpillar which has light blue spots on its side segments, so I suggest therefore boisduvalii. Agree?
It's Caligula in the Catalogue, so let's consider it as a default, as we agreed before.
The species is added to the database/approved.
To "uncertain"!
This species is identified correctly.
Dmitry! Decide yourself and move it to "uncertain"!
But there ...
The species is added to the database/approved.
Lean to melusinalis.
This species is identified correctly.
Looked through all meant, can't see differences between this one and Apatelodes lapitha! Anyway, we can move it to "uncertain" due to the species varies so much and not so explored (can it be explored whatsoever?!!!)
Also, no way for Apatelodes pandara: the line is straight! And all species have a big foretop spot.
Yes, and Apatelodes dianita is in Bolivia.
Well, this is more similar, Apatelodes lapitha: http://www.barcodinglife.com/views/taxbrowser.php?taxid=162366 (Guyane Française).
Good, that we're already talking about family/genus! Anyway, don't approve genus. Palmi and Apatelodes torrefacta, well shown in web, have curvy bands on its forewings. Apatelodes princeps has close pattern, but other features don't suit: http://fr.treknature.com/gallery/South_America/Venezuela/photo196081.htm. Now can surely name only genus.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
Agree!
Maybe, will find something else!
Glyphodes sibillalis.
? Prenesta fenestrinalis - http://www.mbarnes.force9.co.uk/belizemoths/images9/prefen.htm.
? Prenesta scyllalis, Walker, 1859.
News
- 17.11.2024: Импортированы и переведны последние свежие сообщения с форума. Обновлена страница «О сайте».
- 11.11.2024: The Community/Forum section has become more convenient
- 11.11.2024: Improved scaling of images in the Forum/Community
New photos (22.11.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 15:51, A. Kuzmin: Подскажите, к кому обратиться за по...
- 11:29, P. Khramov: Not identified → Conocephalus fuscu...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Entomological seminar in Moscow on November 13
- Streets: insects names
- Meanwhile, in Kotelnich
- Butterflies and music: The Tritones, Vicky's Butterfly
