Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77... 80
Petr, thanks! :) If we compare these photos, then this is the very Japonica adusta (Riley, 1939)!
Poorly, adusta is shown in web so bad (found only this): http://molbiol.ru/forums/lofiversion/index.php/t184005.html.
Petr! Alexandr may be right. If Konstantin adds some more photos, that will be good to verify it once more, especially such that are "No comments".
View transferred from generation to generation Deilephila Choerocampa.
Questionable ssp. suellus, Staudinger, 1878: some authors move it to porcellus synonyms, others (e. g., Catalogue of the Lepidoptera of Russia, 2008) consider it as a species itself. Also, the Catalogue says that suellus is expanded in Siberia (Baikal region), so it's a question who can be in Astrakhan region then.
Alexandr! I asked Konstantin for large size photos of questionable Saturnias (these also) to show it to some American expert in American Saturnias. Maybe, that will clear up the situation. Hylesia teratex is doubtful. This is male, and all males of this species, as we can see on other shots, have brown pubescense, not dark black as this one has. Meh, Konstantin should have had possibility to ...
View transferred from generation to generation Callophrys Antigius.
The species is added to the database/approved.
This species is identified correctly.
Fouled up, maybe. Now databased for sure.
The species is added to the database/approved.
This species is identified correctly.
The species is added to the database/approved.
This species is identified correctly.
The species is added to the database/approved.
This species is identified correctly.
The species is added to the database/approved.
This species is identified correctly.
The species is added to the database/approved.
This species is identified correctly.
The species is added to the database/approved.
This species is identified correctly.
The species is added to the database/approved.
This species is identified correctly.
The species is added to the database/approved.
This species is identified correctly.
The species is added to the database/approved.
This species is identified correctly.
The species is added to the database/approved.
To "uncertain".
The species is added to the database/approved.
To "uncertain". Few are similar also, but this is the best one.
This species is identified correctly.
The species is added to the database/approved.
This species is identified correctly.
Seems just Argynnis paphia. Don't pass as similar one above, Argynnis (Argyronome) ruslana Motschulsky, 1866. Underside needed.
Thecla betulae (Linnaeus, 1758).
That's just a label, I think, in these specimens. problem - at a glance nominative, ie about. Ceram, where occur 90% of imported Russian Ulysses.
The species is added to the database/approved.
This species is identified correctly.
The species is added to the database/approved.
This species is identified correctly.
The species is added to the database/approved.
This species is identified correctly.
The species is added to the database/approved.
This species is identified correctly.
The species is added to the database/approved.
This species is identified correctly.
The species is added to the database/approved.
This species is identified correctly.
News
- 17.11.2024: Импортированы и переведны последние свежие сообщения с форума. Обновлена страница «О сайте».
- 11.11.2024: The Community/Forum section has become more convenient
- 11.11.2024: Improved scaling of images in the Forum/Community
New photos (22.11.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 8:58, E. Komarov: Алексей Адамов Здравствуйте Евген...
- 23:07, N. Pichugin: Всем доброго времени суток! Откликн...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Entomological seminar in Moscow on November 13
- Meanwhile, in Kotelnich
- 20th International Insect Fair in Moscow (Russia, October 2023)
- Spring butterfly hunt in Holgates Silverdale Park, Cumbria
