Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16... 23
Corrected data. Cordulegastridae → Cordulegastridae Hagen, 1875.
Corrected data. Cordulegastroidea → Cordulegastroidea Hagen, 1875.
Parent taxon has been changed. Anisoptera → Petaluroidea.
Corrected data. Petaluridae → Petaluridae Needham, 1903.
Parent taxon has been changed. Aeshnoidea → Gomphoidea.
Corrected data. Gomphidae → Gomphidae Rambur, 1842.
Parent taxon has been changed. Anisoptera → Aeshnoidea.
Corrected data. Austropetaliidae → Austropetaliidae Carle & Louton, 1994.
Corrected data. Aeshnidae → Aeshnidae Leach, 1815.
Corrected data. Aeshnoidea → Aeshnoidea Leach, 1815.
Parent taxon has been changed. Odonata → Epiophlebioidea.
Corrected data. Epiophlebiidae → Epiophlebiidae Muttkowski, 1910.
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female.
I would categorically osterёgsya refer these specimens to C. splendens. For the taxonomy of the genus is very confusing; for the region indicated several "types" (?), the symptoms of which are not entirely clear; urgently needed revision. The same applies to several adjacent images.
Date, by the way, rather strange. Whether "inopportune" instance, whether it happens in the South, whether ochepatka ...
Yes. Young. But traces of visible plaque on the abdomen. Sometimes, by the way, old females, on the contrary, are covered by the coating. :)
Male.
These things male.
And how you can confidently exclude C. servilia?
Sympetrum cordulegaster, male
Ophiogomphus reductus, male
And I know who is evk! :)
This Erythromma viridulum . The analogy does not always work. :) And by the way, Eugene, imho would be comme il faut to specify who determined.
Aeshna mixta. Where is the date?
Irina, thank you. Clear. Just the place did not seem to me like the way, so I'm not such a hypothesis put forward. :)
Ah, the beauty! :) I have a question: in the photo you can see a few of the dead (?) Butterflies. It seems like this is not the wings (which could stay if they were somebody pecked), but quite the whole specimens, "prilёgshie on the flank" ... From what?
Sorry. :) I'm too lazy to switch keyboard and write translit - IMHO Move tone. Spetsokna for English, I did not notice. Essentially. "Out" in many places. Firstly, there suborders, and apart from them, even hang separately any taxa which are not formally included. It should not be. Specifically, for example, family Chlorocyphidae should be Zygoptera. Etc.IMHO, or suborders are recorded and ...
This classification is out of date.
S. striolatum
10/15/2015? Today, October 4. Something wrong. :)
Ae. mixta
L. barbarus
P. argus
P. machaon
V. indica
B. ino
A. paphia
Pelopidas sp.
Badamia exclamationis
...or C. hyale...
IMHO P. thersites (or maybe icarus f. icarinus).
Clossiana sp.
Tongeia fischeri
And by the way, in the system of some chaos with systematics Argynnis. For example, in its composition have subgenus Fabriciana (IMHO the most mainstream), but there are separate taxa (species?) Coredippe, vorax, nerippe, xanthodippe, as related here, but there is still a separate genus Fabriciana ... Similar story with other genera in Argynnini. In general, I realize that all is not so simple, ...
It is not Brenthis. Some Argynnis. Male. Prior to the form does not venture to the Far East with them is very difficult.
News
- 17.11.2024: Импортированы и переведны последние свежие сообщения с форума. Обновлена страница «О сайте».
- 11.11.2024: The Community/Forum section has become more convenient
- 11.11.2024: Improved scaling of images in the Forum/Community
New photos (21.11.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 23:07, N. Pichugin: Всем доброго времени суток! Откликн...
- 21:35, A. M.: >21.11.2024 20:53, Влад Проклов >«...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Entomological seminar in Moscow on November 13
- Streets: insects names
- Entomologist? What kind of job is it?
- Parasitic wasp tracks down fertilized butterfly by its smell
