E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19... 23

09.07.2013 2:43, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #22787

sylvestris

06.07.2013 1:20, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #22777

... or L. juvernica (aka reali) :)

01.07.2013 1:43, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #22712

IMHO B. ino

28.06.2013 2:34, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #22699

Not ... with horns, but ... Araschnia levana.

23.06.2013 0:41, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #22316

Igor, thank you!

11.06.2013 0:52, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #22389

This species is identified correctly.

11.06.2013 0:50, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #22395

adippe

07.06.2013 3:42, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #22297

Dunno. :) Melete/dulcinea dilemma always puzzled me. :) I'm not a pro in Far East and, bluntly speaking, now have no time to dip into these nuances. Later maybe. Clearly evident only this is not brassicae.

07.06.2013 3:40, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #22265

Irina, here are my thoughts: 1) in brassicae dark spot at the top of the front wing is clearly semicircular on the inside. See, for example, http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/3784; 2) of the same color svrehu pretty rich black spots; Here we see (the edge of the wing sticking) gray; 3) a little different form the wings and, in general, the overall impression.:) Often somehow immediately clear that in ...

06.06.2013 22:17, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #22297

dulcinea / melete

06.06.2013 2:30, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #22316

:) So, this year they also have. I wonder what part of Forest Park? I was in the area today Pyatihatok and "monsters" is not met. :)

31.05.2013 23:29, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #20707

rapae

31.05.2013 23:29, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #22265

rapae

30.05.2013 22:05, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #22261

This species is identified correctly.

30.05.2013 2:49, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on Acontia vaualbum

What a joke ???

26.05.2013 2:07, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #14675

argus

24.05.2013 1:50, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #22138

alceae

28.04.2013 0:34, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #21875

Moscow region? Labels, labels!... :(

28.04.2013 0:32, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #21875

Antennae from the underside are IMHO dark not light, though not focused properly. So I'm for lineola, maybe should be marked "uncertain". Female, by the way.

27.04.2013 3:53, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #21875

IMHO lineola.

18.04.2013 1:06, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #21799

OK. By the way, an average eumedon is larger. Not sure where to move the photo. :) Anyway "uncertan". :)

17.04.2013 1:03, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #21799

Irina, maybe I missed something, but do you have underside pic of this very specimen? If it's pics #21797 and #21782, then no little word of eumedon. :) If these are photos of a different specimen, then this butterfly can be eumedon (and imho it really is, though can't be 100% sure):)) Eumedon and Aricia artaxerxes feed on Geranium, share the same biotopes and often fly side by side. Can't ...

16.04.2013 2:52, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #21799

Male. Imho rather eumedon. :)

14.04.2013 0:42, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #21789

Th. lineola.

14.04.2013 0:41, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #21782

Aricia ?agestis.

13.04.2013 2:37, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #21758

O. sylvanus no doubt.

11.04.2013 3:37, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #21728

dispar.

11.04.2013 3:37, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #21729

io.

11.04.2013 3:37, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #21730

L. phlaeas.

11.04.2013 3:37, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #21733

selene.

11.04.2013 3:37, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #21731

H. morpheus.

11.04.2013 3:32, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #21739

This species is identified correctly.

11.04.2013 3:32, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #21740

This species is identified correctly.

06.04.2013 3:05, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9556

Igor, where and when? In Kharkov?

23.03.2013 2:41, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #20822

IMHO Rapala pheretima.

23.03.2013 2:34, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #21268

IMHO, Pieris dulcinea/melete.

23.03.2013 2:33, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #21512

Junonia orithya.

23.03.2013 2:33, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #21513

Junonia orithya.

23.03.2013 2:28, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #21544

Why, it's instead Nymphalis xanthomelas! ;) And I clearly see where it's lost, flew to Nizhny Novgorod at feet to that glammy "jacket" and further to the Butterfly House.... :)))

17.02.2013 15:48, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #6380

> But to quote the determinant LW T5 ch5, I probably is not worth it. And kind Celastrina oreas, is not there. He is there. But like Maslowskia. :) Inaccurate ladonides - the most obvious option; but Yuri said that did exactly the picture near ploskosemyannika - food plant oreas (and filipjevi), that would hint. :)

17.02.2013 15:27, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #20791

May try. :) But afaik knowing external features isn't the sure key in this case.

17.02.2013 15:24, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #21041

This species is identified correctly.

17.02.2013 15:24, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #21024

This species is identified correctly.

17.02.2013 15:21, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #6380

Yuri! Here the key point - the year of publication in 1964, and (I think) 1970. lepidopterist does not stand still. As I understand it, somewhere to 70 it was considered that the type of C. argiolus - it Holarctic species inhabiting entirely Eurasia and North America. Polee modern isledovanija shown that it is not. All in.American researchers have gradually "destroyed" this complex 5 or 6 ...

17.02.2013 4:23, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #20791

No doubt Mycalesis sp., but can't be surely said mineus. Too many similar species...

15.02.2013 2:43, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #6380

Yury misunderstood my comment, no biggie. We seem to have repaired comprehension. :)

14.02.2013 4:25, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #6380

Yury, I e-mailed you not to flood the website. :)

13.02.2013 3:29, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #6380

I'm familiar with Y. A. Chistyakov's publication, holding it in my hands now. Sadly there are several serious mistakes made on the identification by photo (blues and skippers), and these cases are way clearer than identification of Celastrina. The thing is that, as I see, the author isn't pro in butterflies but in some moth groups. Yury, so you decide for yourself whom you believe. :) Imho, one ...

13.02.2013 3:16, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #20795

Thanks. Forgot/fouled, I used it already. :)

12.02.2013 2:40, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #20753

Could be varuna. I'm not a pro in this group. :)

Next page

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.