Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18... 23

31.03.2014 0:32, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #28108

Zizina otis

08.03.2014 2:11, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #27915

aglaja

05.03.2014 0:55, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #27877

Z. maha

05.03.2014 0:55, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #27878

Z, maha

21.02.2014 18:49, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #2348

V. vulcania

21.02.2014 18:49, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #2347

V. vulcania

21.02.2014 18:49, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #2346

V. vulcania

19.02.2014 4:06, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #27636

Yes, it is likely sylvanus. Doubts, however, have I not been in Primorye and venatus in nature is unknown to me.

18.02.2014 1:04, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #27670

+1 :)

18.02.2014 1:03, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #27636

It Ochlodes.

31.01.2014 5:14, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #26978

Got it. I meant tentative ID would be better. :) Or it's the genus with only one species in the Philippines (can't check right now); however there are also Telicota and other similar. Imho, the group is quite tough.

30.01.2014 0:58, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #26973

A. hyperbius, male

30.01.2014 0:57, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #26978

Vasily, are you really capable to ID this confidently? If so, hat's off to you. :)

21.11.2013 3:25, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #22722

I'm quite far from being a Zygaenidae expert, anyway I believe Igor is absolutely right. This is male in the photo. If my sclerosis doesn't fool me, pruni has yellow (reduced) proboscis whilst other "greens" don't. Seems yellow here. Plus pruni is rather to be blue than green, what we also can see. :)

21.11.2013 0:29, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #5747

Imho, those who think it's really easy to differ these two Aricia, see the world through pink glasses. :) Sure, there are obvious cases, but to deal with our Kharkov butterflies, I can't clear it up without "rocket artillery" (which I hope some day I'll finally get in use :) Tough case... :) Anyway, as to this specimen, I'd rather lean to Sergey, not surely though. I'd move it to uncertain.

21.11.2013 0:25, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #8279

Everything is possible in theory... Even bear happens to fly... :) At least two things are confusing here: first, it was never noticed in the Black Sea Coast as against well-known migrants such as L. boeticus and L. pirithous, not to mention even more northern regions (please correct me If I'm ignorant), second, is this really Ch. galba? Similar to some extent, far from being sure though.

06.11.2013 3:32, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #24440

Ornithoptera titanoides удалены из синонимов

06.11.2013 3:31, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #24432

, Ornithoptera titanoides, Troides pegasus удалены из синонимов

06.11.2013 3:28, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #24442

, Ornithoptera titanoides, Troides pegasus удалены из синонимов

04.11.2013 0:57, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9644

This species is identified correctly.

04.11.2013 0:56, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #24405

IMHO Heliconius sp.

04.11.2013 0:42, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #21899

Yes.

03.11.2013 3:11, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #21899

IMHO Z. maha. Not exactly.

03.11.2013 3:10, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #22032

With a group of adippe-like (ie, subgenus Fabriciana) there really is chaos and chaos, but it now seems to be not the case. :)

03.11.2013 3:07, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #22032

Returning from the fields of "special" finds that these things A. aglaja, female. :)

03.11.2013 2:58, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #23589

Without a question mark, perhaps. Reassurance, just in case (just checked there are no other species of this genus in Thailand). :)

03.11.2013 2:56, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #23589

Spalgis? Epius

28.10.2013 23:53, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #23885

And rightly so. For this IMHO A. sagana. :)

27.10.2013 3:11, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #21686

Judging by images in Efetov's book, this is I. hyalina. The book is available here: http://www.lepidoptera.crimea.ua/articles/Efetov_2005_Zygaenidae_Crimea.djvu. Yet I'm far from talking professionally as for this case.

27.10.2013 2:56, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #24236

I will answer as experienced indianets :) - it. There is no other such.

28.08.2013 16:46, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #23255

decoloratus

03.08.2013 2:05, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #22995

PS: I put together a few years ago between a few pieces and Peresechnoy Solonitsevka. Atalia and showed Britomartis. They fly in the same habitats. Atalia ranshe little bit, but basically overlaps years. A couple Britomartis / Aurelius somehow can be distinguished by their appearance by Atal (and even then, there are contentious cases), but from each other, I would not venture.Males of all three ...

03.08.2013 2:01, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #22995

Reliable - no.

31.07.2013 2:25, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #22983

Nominative subspecies. :)

31.07.2013 2:23, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #22995

I think it's still Britomartis - of those edges (Solonitsevka-Peresechnaya) it reliably known (determined from the genitals). Aurelius of the Kharkiv region was significantly not yet known (and indeed its discovery we have quite unlikely). Appearance can be deceptive here. But if this specimen collected - you can find out for sure.I can cook it. :)