Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490... 497

13.02.2011 20:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5501

This one is to go to "identified" (approved).

13.02.2011 20:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5046

Quote that website: "DISTRIBUTION: C. & S. America. TYPE LOCALITY: Brazil. BELIZE RECORDS: Greenhills. METHOD OF IDENTIFICATION: adult illustrated by Seitz (1925) plate 5, fig. d4. NOTES: if Seitz’ identification is correct this seems a quite characteristic species."

13.02.2011 20:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5046

Well, I digged that out somewhere in Belize: http://www.mbarnes.force9.co.uk/belizemoths/plate13x.htm.

13.02.2011 17:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5030

What about this: http://www.mbarnes.force9.co.uk/belizemoths/images8/gonsic.htm ? Gonodonta sicheas Cramer, 1777 ?

13.02.2011 16:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5046

Tachyphyle basiplaga, Walker 1861.

13.02.2011 16:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5030

Gonodonta sp. (?syrna, Guenée,1852?)

13.02.2011 16:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5030

Noctuidae.

13.02.2011 15:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #4972

Sosxetra sp. (can't go further).

13.02.2011 11:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5501

Right: Diaphania hyalinata (Linnaeus, 1767), year may be wrong.

13.02.2011 11:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5501

Fouled up: Crambidae are separated and I'll add to them.

13.02.2011 11:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5501

Crambidae, should be new genus added to Pyralidae?

13.02.2011 10:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5501

Diaphania hyalinata (Linnaeus, 1758).

12.02.2011 19:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #4665

Suggestion: this one is not C. umbritica. Mine (#4309 shot) looked absolutely different when I found it.

12.02.2011 11:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5491

Approve and add genus.

11.02.2011 23:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #4999

Finished genus just now (what managed to find out). Waiting for approval.

11.02.2011 23:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #4999

This species is identified correctly.

11.02.2011 22:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #4973

This species is identified correctly.

11.02.2011 22:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5031

This species is identified correctly.

11.02.2011 22:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5043

This species is identified correctly.

11.02.2011 22:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5043

Yes, that's it, no doubts! Alive form is absolutely crazy, unbelievable. Adjacent genus added.

11.02.2011 21:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5043

So knackered... Sure, Notodontidae!

11.02.2011 21:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5043

Sorry, Noctuidae.

11.02.2011 21:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5043

Notodontidae, will add genus now. So Alexander, did you find it out? My brain is totally collapsed.

11.02.2011 18:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5055

Eucereon sp. (Arctiidae). Species is hard to identify.

11.02.2011 15:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5071

This one should be moved to Antiblemma trogocycla, "uncertain", Hampson, 1926 (no any version).

11.02.2011 15:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5070

Should be moved to Antiblemma orbiculata (Felder & Rogenhofer, 1874).

11.02.2011 15:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5070

This species is identified correctly.

11.02.2011 14:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5034

Last to move for today.

11.02.2011 14:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5034

This species is identified correctly.

11.02.2011 14:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5012

This species is identified correctly.

11.02.2011 14:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #4980

This species is identified correctly.

11.02.2011 14:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #4979

This species is identified correctly.

11.02.2011 14:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #4987

This species is identified correctly.

11.02.2011 14:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #4984

This species is identified correctly.

11.02.2011 13:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5033

These species can be moved.

11.02.2011 13:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5033

This species is identified correctly.

11.02.2011 13:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5068

This species is identified correctly.

11.02.2011 13:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5074

This species is identified correctly.

11.02.2011 13:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5077

This species is identified correctly.

11.02.2011 13:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5062

This species is identified correctly.

11.02.2011 13:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5489

This species is identified correctly.

11.02.2011 4:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5033

Berberodes conchylata, Guenée, [1858].

10.02.2011 22:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5034

Will add genus now.

10.02.2011 22:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5074

Can be moved to "uncertain". Just added genus today (being moderated now).

10.02.2011 22:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #4966

Think, this is Plebicula thersites (Cartener, [1835]), Evgeny is right. English (LepIndex) say: Scientific Name of Taxon: thersites Original Rank: ? Current Status: Valid Name Current Rank: SPECIES Original Combination: AGRIADES ! Cantener, 1834 Comments: Original Description Reference: Current valid name: Current Valid Name: PLEBICULA thersites Comments: Current Name Reference: