Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487... 497

04.09.2011 20:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5879

Females are just harder to shoot. They are high flyers, and can be rare met below tree crowns.

04.09.2011 14:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #10519

That's it.

04.09.2011 7:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #3118

Should be changed: 1998-07-21 to move to "Date and shot/caught location", and remove 2009-06-14 11:36:00. Also delete second "female".

04.09.2011 7:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #9527

Male.

04.09.2011 7:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #9527

This species is identified correctly.

04.09.2011 7:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #9268

Yes, that's female.

04.09.2011 7:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5881

Males.

04.09.2011 7:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5880

Female.

04.09.2011 7:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #3772

Male.

04.09.2011 7:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #9266

Male.

04.09.2011 7:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #9266

This species is identified correctly.

04.09.2011 7:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #7759

Male.

04.09.2011 7:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #7753

Male.

04.09.2011 7:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #7752

Male.

04.09.2011 7:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5880

This species is identified correctly.

04.09.2011 7:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #3770

Male.

04.09.2011 7:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #2370

Male.

04.09.2011 7:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5879

Male.

04.09.2011 7:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5879

This species is identified correctly.

04.09.2011 7:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #9468

Female.

03.09.2011 22:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #9220

Nematopogon sp. for sure. Suspect this: http://ukmoths.org.uk/show.php?id=5796. Hard to say, let's wait for Vlad.

03.09.2011 22:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #9488

Caterpillar (not sure though if it can be identified).

03.09.2011 22:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #10150

Seems the same as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/10159/.

03.09.2011 18:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #10482

That's Arctia caja (Linnaeus, 1758).

02.09.2011 6:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #10366

The underside of a male on #10365.

02.09.2011 1:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #10457

Also there: http://www.leps.it/indexjs.htm?SpeciesPages/XanthQuadr.htm.

02.09.2011 1:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #10457

Move it there, I asked one man about this very butterfly: http://sungaya.narod.ru/hete/geo/xan_qua.htm.

31.08.2011 22:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #10457

This one, say, can be moved to Xanthorhoe quadrifasciata, "identified successfully".

31.08.2011 21:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #10458

If so, both can be moved there http://lepidoptera.pro/species/xanthorhoe-quadrifasciata/, as I think.

31.08.2011 20:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #10345

This species is identified correctly.

31.08.2011 20:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #10345

This is not D.porcellus at all, but the very D.elpenor (horny caterpillar). There how it's possible to differ these two species: http://www.schmetterlinge-westerwald.de/untergruppe/familie/unterfamilie/index.php?av=0&ar=0&settings=0&vorschau=1&ansicht=1&gruppeid=1&untergruppeid=1&familieid=6&id=88&portait_gewaehlt=1.

31.08.2011 19:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #10458

Is not it the same as #10457?

31.08.2011 19:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #10457

Xanthorhoe quadrifasciata (Clerck, 1759)?

31.08.2011 19:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #10459

This species is identified correctly.

31.08.2011 14:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #9952

Maksim, Hyles gallii was always in Moscow region, there even can be a second generation (#3003 shot). Sometimes you can meet caterpillars on willow herbs.

30.08.2011 18:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #9836

Yes, depends on geography.

30.08.2011 15:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #10304

The underside of #10303 shot.

29.08.2011 6:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #6690

Male :) This species has a very clear sexual dimorphism.

28.08.2011 20:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #10279

Caterpillar.

28.08.2011 20:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #6692

Male.

28.08.2011 20:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #6691

Female.

28.08.2011 20:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #6690

The opposite gender it is.

28.08.2011 20:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #6688

Male.

28.08.2011 20:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #3541

Male.

28.08.2011 20:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #10296

Male.

28.08.2011 20:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #10297

Female.

28.08.2011 19:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #2045

Yep.

28.08.2011 17:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #10299

Important!!! "The south part of Ozuevsky 'hood, Moscow region" should be corrected everywhere to "The south part of Orekhovo-Zuevsky 'hood, Moscow region". There is no "Zuevsky" 'hood in Moscow region :)