Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484... 497
Sorry. Or I don't dig it and such things can happen.
I suppose we can rely upon Dmitry's identifying. This is likely such kind of a sexual dimorphism.
Likely there is no any. Let's wait for Boris Stradomsky who might put a dot on it.
Its wingspan is about 6cm (measured with a ruler). Bigger than those average I caught before. Most curious that I literally forgot its pupa that was left in the soil on a sill with no any care. Whatsoever, one morning I just saw it sitting over there!
The underside of the female on #12557 photo.
This species is identified correctly.
We've got such one already discussed.
Seems to be Cucullia blattariae.
That's right.
I miss lots of stuff, sorry :) Aglia tau, no doubt.
Amerila astreus (Drury, 1773).
Couldn't it be Ideopsis similis? Or something of the kind.
Broken too.
Petr, move it to "identified successfully": http://www.biolib.cz/en/image/id175290/. This is just a subspecies.
This species is identified correctly.
DescriptionParantica sita
DescriptionPapilio agestor
Yes, that's thoas (identified such today on one internet forum). Likely to be some subspecies.
Needed for sure, but we seem to get no any (the photo is not a collection one). Rather thus far move it to "uncertain" keeping the species as it's identified. I might have prematurely identified demophon as the most known of the genus.
Archaeoprepona demophon
Gah, meant Prepona demophon, Linnaeus, 1758. Anyway, it should be moved out of here.
It ain't no way G. Sarpedon! This is an American Nymphalidae of Prepona genus. I'd suggest Papilio demophon, Linnaeus, 1758.
The whole set of #12251; #12250; #12252; #12247; #12253; #12246 should be moved to that. It's not way much variable yet.
Photo of the same species, #12281, is at the admin panel.
Hepialus humuli (Linnaeus, 1758), male. Seems to be no any other.
Conistra vaccinii (Linnaeus, 1761)?
Analogued to #12246 photo.
Analogued to #12246 shot.
Conistra vaccinii (Linnaeus, 1761)?
Analogued to #12246 photo.
Analogued to #12246 photo.
Conistra vaccinii (Linnaeus, 1761)?
Cerura sp. ?erminea?
See no candidates more: might be moved to "identified successfully".
Correbia lycoides (Walker, 1854). http://www.zonacharrua.com/butterflies/Andes%20-%20Correbia%20lycoides.htm.
Move it there.
Spilosoma lutea (Hufnagel, 1766).
The underside.
This species is identified correctly.
Imo, for an "uncertain" male that's quite sure: http://www.biolib.cz/en/image/id43111/.
Nevermind. I've just ignored the search but checked Archiearis genus first thinking thus far it still belongs to that.
Uh-huh, got it. I just checked it up in Archiearis as usual. Faulty me :)
To move to Archiearis parthenias, and no any questions.
Namely, this is A. notha male if we look at its forewings http://sungaya.narod.ru/hete/geo/arc_not.htm.
I relied on Alexandr's website http://sungaya.narod.ru/hete/geo/epi_tri.htm. The female underside drawn my attention.
Is it the same as #12034? Then it's the very Epirrhoe tristata (Linnaeus, 1758), seems to be female.
This species is identified correctly.
I'll add the species once as it gets possible.
Rather could be moved to Archiearis notha (Hubner, 1803), "uncertain".
The author is right, it's likely Epirrhoe tristata (Linnaeus, 1758).
News
- 17.11.2024: Импортированы и переведны последние свежие сообщения с форума. Обновлена страница «О сайте».
- 11.11.2024: The Community/Forum section has become more convenient
- 11.11.2024: Improved scaling of images in the Forum/Community
New photos (22.11.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 15:51, A. Kuzmin: Подскажите, к кому обратиться за по...
- 11:29, P. Khramov: Not identified → Conocephalus fuscu...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Entomological seminar in Moscow on November 13
- Meanwhile, in Kotelnich
- Meanwhile, at the "Reptilium"
- Sphecodina caudata, Shijimiaeoides divina and Protohermes martynovae are to be included in The Red List of Khabarovsk Krai
