Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481... 497
Petr, check the full name, it has lots of synonyms.
Could be met in Thailand? Imho, shouldn't confuse the folks with such sayings...
UPD: don't move anywhere. Detailed consideration needed. I hurried up, sorry.
Here is the genus. Species may be moved to Hemistola chrysoprasaria.
Female.
Alexandr, I myself didn't register there. Ought not depend on that. There was that thread, "Entomological toolkit" that I opened here a couple of years ago, somehow it got lost somewhere. Thank God, I bookmark all the links.
Protuliocnemis partita.
Adelpha iphiclus.
No other: http://www.biolib.cz/en/image/id43148/
Seems nothing but that: http://www.biolib.cz/en/taxonimage/id43146/.
This species is identified correctly.
More precisely, Euphaedra (Euphaedrana) harpalyce spatiosa (Mabille, 1877).
Yesterday had no time, just checked it, it's already catalogued as Agriphila aeneociliella.
Euphaedra (Euphaedrana) harpalyce (Cramer, [1777]).
Surely this one was posted on molbiol as well as some other photos of mine. I'm registered there under my real name and surname (written in Latin letters and with hyphen). Didn't catch the butterfly, let it keep living, so can say nothing of its gender.
Yury, that remark was made towards me, wasn't? Oh please, anyone happens to get confused, especially when this someone is sorting out worlds of unidentified stuff. That's life.
Yury, the answer was the second part of my comment "variability..." and "I have see no any other variants". I'm open to corrections after all.
Yes, it's there. Tomorrow (no time now) I'll catalogue it.
http://eol.org/pages/572168/overview.
Yury, what would you think identifying species in nature photo? Species variability matters too, I have see no any other variants though dug through plenty of the Far Eastern Pieris.
Then I give in, this is anything but sappho.
Probably, Neptis philyroides, Staudinger, 1887, or another? No thoughts without underside........
Pieris dulcinea indeed: http://www.euroleps.ch/seiten/s_art.php?art=pier_dulcinea.
Actually, it looks like Pieris dulcinea (Butler, 1882).
Range matches too: "NE. China, the Amur and Ussuri regions to Korea and Japan". Anybody please comment?
To "uncertain" this one: nothing more similar did I find by now.
Pterothysanus laticilia most probably.
Charaxes zoolina.
Charaxes numenes.
Right....
Alexandr, now it's called Charaxes lycurgus (Fabricius, 1793).
UPD: moved.
Irina, the website search works good. Just you should enter the species name, say, "canace" for this one, and voila, autosuggestion works fine.
This species is identified correctly.
The species name is incorrect, this is Cymatophoropsis trimaculata ssp. formosana Matsumura, 1927 (can't add the right name myself).
Species name typo, should be moved to Archaeobalbis cristata.
Male (just as the rest photos): look at its massive antennae :)
Seems like Lyssa menoetius (Hopffer, 1856).
Seems this one should be kept as it is.
Let it be vulgaris :) Absolutely rely on Evgeny's identification.
The species are very similar, I may have slipped up.
Parthenos sylvia.
Ideopsis similis.
Ideopsis similis.
Ideopsis similis.
No, I've got no any other nicknames or pseudonyms here. I am who I am :) Some bug, perhaps?
I think, it's useless to identify them by photo made in nature so I wrote sinapis.
May be moved as well if from Moscow region.
Spilosoma lubricipeda.
Aporia crataegi.
Pieris brassicae.
Coenonympha glycerion?
Leptidea sinapis.
Next page