E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481... 497

05.03.2013 14:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #21213

Petr, check the full name, it has lots of synonyms.

04.03.2013 20:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #21191

Could be met in Thailand? Imho, shouldn't confuse the folks with such sayings...

04.03.2013 19:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #21217

UPD: don't move anywhere. Detailed consideration needed. I hurried up, sorry.

04.03.2013 19:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #21217

Here is the genus. Species may be moved to Hemistola chrysoprasaria.

03.03.2013 20:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #21436

Female.

03.03.2013 20:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #20745

Alexandr, I myself didn't register there. Ought not depend on that. There was that thread, "Entomological toolkit" that I opened here a couple of years ago, somehow it got lost somewhere. Thank God, I bookmark all the links.

03.03.2013 19:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #21213

Protuliocnemis partita.

03.03.2013 16:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #20826

Adelpha iphiclus.

03.03.2013 16:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #20745

No other: http://www.biolib.cz/en/image/id43148/

03.03.2013 16:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #20749

Seems nothing but that: http://www.biolib.cz/en/taxonimage/id43146/.

03.03.2013 16:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #20749

This species is identified correctly.

03.03.2013 15:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #21420

More precisely, Euphaedra (Euphaedrana) harpalyce spatiosa (Mabille, 1877).

03.03.2013 15:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #21276

Yesterday had no time, just checked it, it's already catalogued as Agriphila aeneociliella.

03.03.2013 14:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #21420

Euphaedra (Euphaedrana) harpalyce (Cramer, [1777]).

03.03.2013 1:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #10030

Surely this one was posted on molbiol as well as some other photos of mine. I'm registered there under my real name and surname (written in Latin letters and with hyphen). Didn't catch the butterfly, let it keep living, so can say nothing of its gender.

02.03.2013 9:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #21256

Yury, that remark was made towards me, wasn't? Oh please, anyone happens to get confused, especially when this someone is sorting out worlds of unidentified stuff. That's life.

02.03.2013 8:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #21267

Yury, the answer was the second part of my comment "variability..." and "I have see no any other variants". I'm open to corrections after all.

02.03.2013 5:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #21276

Yes, it's there. Tomorrow (no time now) I'll catalogue it. http://eol.org/pages/572168/overview.

02.03.2013 5:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #21267

Yury, what would you think identifying species in nature photo? Species variability matters too, I have see no any other variants though dug through plenty of the Far Eastern Pieris.

01.03.2013 21:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #21256

Then I give in, this is anything but sappho.

01.03.2013 18:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #21256

Probably, Neptis philyroides, Staudinger, 1887, or another? No thoughts without underside........

01.03.2013 18:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #21267

Pieris dulcinea indeed: http://www.euroleps.ch/seiten/s_art.php?art=pier_dulcinea.

01.03.2013 18:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #21267

Actually, it looks like Pieris dulcinea (Butler, 1882). Range matches too: "NE. China, the Amur and Ussuri regions to Korea and Japan". Anybody please comment?

01.03.2013 8:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #21077

To "uncertain" this one: nothing more similar did I find by now.

28.02.2013 21:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #21179

Pterothysanus laticilia most probably.

28.02.2013 20:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #21401

Charaxes zoolina.

28.02.2013 20:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #21400

Charaxes numenes.

28.02.2013 20:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #21386

Right....

28.02.2013 19:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #21386

Alexandr, now it's called Charaxes lycurgus (Fabricius, 1793).

28.02.2013 19:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #21376

UPD: moved.

28.02.2013 18:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #21376

Irina, the website search works good. Just you should enter the species name, say, "canace" for this one, and voila, autosuggestion works fine.

28.02.2013 18:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #21376

This species is identified correctly.

27.02.2013 21:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #21139

The species name is incorrect, this is Cymatophoropsis trimaculata ssp. formosana Matsumura, 1927 (can't add the right name myself).

27.02.2013 19:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #21159

Species name typo, should be moved to Archaeobalbis cristata.

27.02.2013 5:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #21324

Male (just as the rest photos): look at its massive antennae :)

25.02.2013 19:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #20763

Seems like Lyssa menoetius (Hopffer, 1856).

04.02.2013 18:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #3580

Seems this one should be kept as it is.

04.02.2013 18:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #20598

Let it be vulgaris :) Absolutely rely on Evgeny's identification. The species are very similar, I may have slipped up.

03.02.2013 21:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #20716

Parthenos sylvia.

03.02.2013 21:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #20725

Ideopsis similis.

03.02.2013 21:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #20726

Ideopsis similis.

03.02.2013 17:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #20598

Ideopsis similis.

03.02.2013 16:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #20627

No, I've got no any other nicknames or pseudonyms here. I am who I am :) Some bug, perhaps?

03.02.2013 16:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #20628

I think, it's useless to identify them by photo made in nature so I wrote sinapis.

02.02.2013 5:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #20627

May be moved as well if from Moscow region.

01.02.2013 21:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #20606

Spilosoma lubricipeda.

01.02.2013 21:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #20623

Aporia crataegi.

01.02.2013 20:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #20707

Pieris brassicae.

01.02.2013 20:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #20627

Coenonympha glycerion?

01.02.2013 20:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #20628

Leptidea sinapis.

Next page

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.