Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480... 497
Irina law: itEpicallia villicaIt is necessary to move.
So Aporia Crataegi klyatyhAporia crataegi
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
Prepona omphale one of the synonyms Prepona laertes
Definitely not.
And to shoot the collection material still recommend to buy a small shtativchik and take the self-timer in macro mode. And with the light sensitive poshamanil.
It ought to drag Swallowtail. Or even what opinions will be? Just wondering.
And most likely like this: Papilio machaon aliaska Scudder, 1869 http://butterfliesofamerica.com/papilio_machaon_aliaska.htm
Share a secret, plz. What the camera manages to shoot well? Racking their brains ..........
Also gonepteryx have no one. Final verdict: highly tattered male Gonepteryx rhamni. Namesake, a small note: very warps from office pins. I advise you to still use tattoos for entomology. Meanwhile, a parallel to the site of Peter entomological work shop: http://lepstore.ru/
This species is identified correctly.
Yeah... So does Lexias dirtea:) Could be moved.
Chiasmia clathrata.
Lomographa bimaculata.
Crocallis elinguaria.
Petr, everything is correct. I linked this pic after Alexandr's comment:) Might as well have added species then too, can't remember.
Just this time agree with wikipedia. Couldn't attach here scan of a page from the English identification guide, so used wikipedia link. Didn't check the English version, blame me :)
In English yes, that's right: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaniska_canace. There is also white admiral or Limenitis camilla. Different countries use different common names which meant that the only one and right name is the Latin one.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This is a forest cockroach of the gehus Ectobius, Stephens, 1835. Supposedly Ectobius sylvestris Poda, 1761 as one of the most common over the Moscow region. These cockroaches are great for they never live close to people. Nice thingies.
Where's this pic from (location)? Arichanna melanaria perhaps?
True and a female (have one drying right now on my mounting board).
This species is identified correctly.
Surely Erannis defoliaria no doubt. The more, this one is quite variable: I've got a few rather different specimens that were all caught in one place one time. Should upload them later.
How come this flew to the genus? Just Caligo with no species name...
Yeah, nothing better. According to the website taxonomy, this is P. zagreus chrysomelus.
Amusing. By the way, Deilephila elpenor and Deilephila porcellus larvae too look kinda snaky, though they definitely lose against this one.
Check this: http://www.butterfliesofamerica.com/L/pterourus_zagreus_chrysomelus_types.htm. What a mess...
Still Pterourus bachus isn't basically Papilio zagreus synonym, and chrysomelus (Rothschild & Jordan, 1906) is a subspecies. How come subspecies can be deemed as a species? With all that I moved it to P. zagreus.
Naah... don't hunt them. Would do N. polychloros, they have clearly decreased in my hood. Good, that one is not red-listed :)
Soon (as the snow melts away) we can see these red-listed "glammy jackets" in large masses:)
Dmitry says right: A. avernus is a subspecies, Antirrhea philoctetes avernus Hopffer, 1874.
Thank you, Peter. Online "screen will return," to show that fixed a.
Peter, well, you transfer the last of its final. Stale it under a false name :)
This pic should be moved to Parapsestis lichenea (the species's already added) and signed with "Identified by Oleg Pekarsky", whilst the species it was previosly linked to should be kept unillustrated since it's a different species that can be illustrated after a while. I moved this pic to A. maxima by mistake, relied on the author's comment.
Pah-you: do not go there rashly posted yesterday: view Acronicta (Acronicta) maxima Moore 1881. not removed.
Incorrect an author: this is actuallyParapsestis licheneaof Drepanidae. Yesterday fought on the forum here has created a form (see. The very first post). Definition Oleg trust her completely and have to move. Do not scoop it, however :)
Thank you, Leo. It seems to happen. The picture number 59 and 60 http://bit.ly/Xfl95Q
We must move: even found one Chinese website it as Parapsestis lichenea: link not give why it happens again kilometer.
Yep, I've got the whole genus spread like that.
Well, yes, it is difficult. Type I drove here: ...
Parapsestis lichenea It is necessary to add a subspecies: Parapsestis lichenea splendida Laszlo, G.Ronkay, L.Ronkay & Witt, 2007 Determination type: Oleg Baking.
Dmitry, did you gather this? Curious to see it spread.
So I did add the species. Let's move it to "uncertain" at least.
Nothing to dissect in the souvenir thing:)
Nope:)
Later. Any doubt?
Uh-huh..... Got myself confused yesterday. Luckily wasn't late to come round.
News
- 17.11.2024: Импортированы и переведны последние свежие сообщения с форума. Обновлена страница «О сайте».
- 11.11.2024: The Community/Forum section has become more convenient
- 11.11.2024: Improved scaling of images in the Forum/Community
New photos (22.11.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 22:10, A. Dymchenko: Пётр, да, она, спасибо. Там, как я...
- 18:43, A. Kuzmin: Ещё несколько перепонов из Амурской...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Entomological seminar in Moscow on November 13
- Entomologist? What kind of job is it?
- Meanwhile, in Kotelnich
- Artist Paul Villinski brought butterflies to East Rockaway School, NY
