Pages: 1 ...477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485... 497
The shot date should be changed to 2009/08/23. I've got on my personal page this very caterpillar "extended".
Dmitry, no matter, I added that. I promised to, whatsoever. That's good you reminded me cause I already forgot that.
Specially as it's needed I poked out that souvenir thing this butterfly was put into with underside. Today I'll throw it in :)
And, by the way, to "identified successfully: http://www.boldsystems.org/views/taxbrowser.php?taxid=318572.
The underside uploaded. It's labelled with the shot date which should be marked there too. I'll add genus now and apply the species therein.
Will be a little bit later on, I'll add it today to my personal page. Just as I've got it right ready to hand.
Yeah, that's a bad deal with all these Eligma, I found just two species looked nearly twins. So that's why it's in "uncertain". Wash-out... Even though these are big and bright-colored moths, there is minimum information about...
Ugh, thanks. I suspected that too, but its darkness confused me either I couldn't find an underside photo.
Might be moved to "identified successfully", I think? I relied on this when identifying: http://www.drlegrain.be/0nyungwe/jour/Pierinae/Pierinae.html#mylothris.
Dmitry, thanks for identifying! Just as I'm ready to share three items of this species (this is a sole butterfly which came not single). But I'm interested in trading not selling. Let's deal it by e-mail, if needed.
I'm now doing the free Avast, this might stumble somehow (I'm about to change that soon to the favorite and reputable Dr. Web).
Andrey, that's even weird. Mine had such a big reaction. Heuristics blocked that completely. The file attached seems to be clear though. Weird.
Andrey, your mails are being blocked by my antivirus (can't get it thus): you'd better scan your system for some "evils".
If it's actually Calliteara pudibunda??? Unhappily, I know only "red-tailed" caterpillars, so that's why I wonder.