Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489... 497
Why it's so transparent, huh?
Hard to guess its gender indeed. Suggest male, cause there might be seen at least partly dark spot through the hole in its forewing, if female.
Maybe, Pieris brassicae (male)? It lives in Egypt, and should be in Turkey then, I think.
Macaria alternata (Denis & Schiffermüller, 1775).
If I'm not wrong, Timandra comae, Schmidt, 1931?
Alexandr, chill out, please. What about you, what's your own opinion? I saw first a common griseola (what is enough everywhere). As for sure identifying, we can't take out genitalia of this photo, even with all our strength :)
Nothing special: just shot from its underside, laying down on the back.
Rather subspecies: http://fen.nsu.ru/~vvdubat/Lithosiinae/Eilema_griseolum.htm. Since it's impossible to identify for sure, then to nominative.
This is clear, that's why I asked. Think, to "uncertain".
Ascalapha odorata female (Linnaeus, 1758) http://www.guianensis.fr/photos_noctuidae_2.htm.
My suggestion is Z. trifolii, uncertain.
My suggestion is Z. trifolii, uncertain.
Eilema griseola (Hübner, [1803]) ?
Hm, looks rather dark for that. But ok, let it be promissa. I just caught lots of sponsa this year, so. Maybe, see it in others then. Sorry.
Imho, Catocala sponsa, Linnaeus, 1767.
Pieris napi male (Linnaeus, 1758).
Genus is much questionable and unclear. What should it be, Caligula, Rinaca (as it's now) or Saturnia??? http://www.saturniidae-web.de/Saturnia.htm.
Quote: "View Baronia brevicornis is in the family sailing alone; he even highlighted in a separate subfamily. What an honor? Because this butterfly - a kind of" living fossil ", the last representative of an ancestral group of sailboats, extinct millions of years ago, one Butterflies of the oldest in the world! " "les Papillons du Monde" Alain Eid & Michel Viard. Les Editions Hatier, Paris 1996.
Eugene is Ulysses New Guinea (the label is correct, and a butterfly with the early 1990s I). I trust the source 100%.
Databased (being moderated now).
Was no such species (just added).
This species is identified correctly.
There, Boris. Once again this butterfly, and it is now checked.
View famous for its imitation of their poisonous and inedible butterfly of the family Nymphalidae (Danainae): Parantica sita Kollar, 1844. http://lepidoptera.ru/species/parantica-sita/
Photo should be applied to this species.
Male (crucial note).
This should be also moved to the species.
Photo should be applied to the species description.
An interesting quote: "Australia is not only a desert: it is also a country of tropical forests, which lives about 400 species of butterflies (half of them endemic).Most prized Papilio Ulysses (Papilio ulysses) with their pearl-blue wings, almost as beautiful Amazonian Morpho and sell at least a high price to collectors all over the world (the main buyers of Japanese-). Particularly sensitive to ...
I added few species yesterday morning (this also, maybe). I may be wrong (use logs since now). Extras should be removed, for sure, and genus needed classifying.
Where is it, huh?
This one is also should be approved.
Approve genus, please (not approved since the very morning).
This species is identified correctly.
Zygaena lonicerae (Scheven, 1777).
That's it, I think: http://mothphotographersgroup.msstate.edu/MC-Honduras/MC-Honduras01.shtml http://www.mbarnes.force9.co.uk/belizemoths/images7/pyrrha.htm.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
Ok then, let's set like this. Genus and species are databased (done in the morning, already approved). To move.
Google knows not so much about this one.
Seems to be: http://bugguide.net/node/view/339517/bgimage. But either it much varies http://mothphotographersgroup.msstate.edu/species.php?hodges=5202, or it is not this species at all?
Don't agree, I see the very this of Crambidae, anyway can be moved to "uncertain".
This species is identified correctly.
One more of Pyralidae is done. http://www.mbarnes.force9.co.uk/belizemoths/images9/desbaj.htm, that's it.
There it is: http://www.papillon-poitou-charentes.org/Gonodonta-sicheas-Cramer-1777,20719.html. And this is also: http://www.inra.fr/papillon/noctuid/ophideri/textfr/g_sichea.htm.
http://bugguide.net/node/view/348761.
News
- 17.11.2024: Импортированы и переведны последние свежие сообщения с форума. Обновлена страница «О сайте».
- 11.11.2024: The Community/Forum section has become more convenient
- 11.11.2024: Improved scaling of images in the Forum/Community
New photos (22.11.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 8:58, E. Komarov: Алексей Адамов Здравствуйте Евген...
- 23:07, N. Pichugin: Всем доброго времени суток! Откликн...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Entomological seminar in Moscow on November 13
- The petition in defense of biological nomenclature
- Entomologist? What kind of job is it?
- ZooKeys latest issue of the Contributions to the systematics of New World macro-moths
