Pages: 1 ...483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491... 497
Let's leave P. icarus and move if somebody approves C. semiargus. Ambiguous shot anyway. If you only saw how patient and insistent he was :)
Should be: http://www.nic.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/papilionoidea/lycaenidae/polyommatinae/polyommatus/index.html#
Already Polyommatus: http://www.nic.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/papilionoidea/lycaenidae/polyommatinae/polyommatus/index.html#phyllides phyllides.
Pay attention to the basic white tendrils. It is on this basis form of visually distinguishable from Spilosoma lubricipeda Linnaeus, 1758
It is time for these types of scatter. Diachrysia chrysitis there is only one # 4187 The rest are Diachrysia stenochrysis Warren, 1913 (the kind created and approved).
Don't know, who, but also think it's Lonomia sp. (can't name the species): http://www.saturniidae-web.de/Lonomia.htm.
Added Nothus genus based on http://www.nhm.ac.uk/jdsml/research-curation/research/projects/lepindex/checklist.dsml?searchPageURL=index.dsml&UserID=&UserName=&sort=SCIENTIFIC_NAME_on_card&Current_superfamily=Geometroidea&Current_family=Sematuridae&Current_subfamily=&Current_tribe=&recLimit=500. So, that is Nothus lunus male, Linnaeus, 1758, and its female on #4991 photo. Both should be moved.
Hey, still open question, if it belongs to Sematura genus or Nothus? http://www.guianensis.fr/photos_sematuridae.htm#Sematura lunus (hard to say). Grand dame it is, should be identified by the shot location.
Petr, just added to my personal page similar one, way more funny. What to do with such photos, dunno:)
This is also should be cleared: http://www.nic.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/noctuoidea/arctiidae/ctenuchinae/clystea/index.html#leucaspis. Opinions needed.