E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491... 497

10.02.2011 18:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5529

Boris, thanks! I put it as icarus, but now we have the first semiargus, well :)

10.02.2011 17:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5024

To move. And that's all for today, I hope.

10.02.2011 17:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #4989

To move to Rhescyntis hippodamia (Cramer, [1777]).

10.02.2011 17:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #4971

To move.

10.02.2011 17:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5015

To move too.

10.02.2011 17:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5051

To move (approved).

10.02.2011 16:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5529

Let's leave P. icarus and move if somebody approves C. semiargus. Ambiguous shot anyway. If you only saw how patient and insistent he was :)

10.02.2011 15:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #4966

Should be: http://www.nic.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/papilionoidea/lycaenidae/polyommatinae/polyommatus/index.html#

10.02.2011 15:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #4965

Already Polyommatus: http://www.nic.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/papilionoidea/lycaenidae/polyommatinae/polyommatus/index.html#phyllides phyllides.

10.02.2011 15:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5529

Wasn't sure what genus and species it was, sorry :)

10.02.2011 8:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Spilosoma urticae

Pay attention to the basic white tendrils. It is on this basis form of visually distinguishable from Spilosoma lubricipeda Linnaeus, 1758

10.02.2011 8:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5083

This species is identified correctly.

09.02.2011 23:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #2519

Vote plus: let's move already.

09.02.2011 22:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #2588

Will upload tomorrow (think I have some in a collection).

09.02.2011 22:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #2588

This species is identified correctly.

09.02.2011 22:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Diachrysia stenochrysis

And these, too, to all Diachrysia stenochrysis Warren, in 1913 it is necessary in my opinion.

09.02.2011 22:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Diachrysia chrysitis

It is time for these types of scatter. Diachrysia chrysitis there is only one # 4187 The rest are Diachrysia stenochrysis Warren, 1913 (the kind created and approved).

09.02.2011 19:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5051

This species is identified correctly.

09.02.2011 19:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5081

To move.

09.02.2011 19:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5058

Time to move.

09.02.2011 19:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #4989

This species is identified correctly.

09.02.2011 17:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5025

Should be moved.

09.02.2011 17:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5006

Genus and species added and approved, time to move.

09.02.2011 17:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5494

Don't know, who, but also think it's Lonomia sp. (can't name the species): http://www.saturniidae-web.de/Lonomia.htm.

09.02.2011 17:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #4992

The previous photo also should be moved. Genus added and approved.

09.02.2011 12:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #4992

Added Nothus genus based on http://www.nhm.ac.uk/jdsml/research-curation/research/projects/lepindex/checklist.dsml?searchPageURL=index.dsml&UserID=&UserName=&sort=SCIENTIFIC_NAME_on_card&Current_superfamily=Geometroidea&Current_family=Sematuridae&Current_subfamily=&Current_tribe=&recLimit=500. So, that is Nothus lunus male, Linnaeus, 1758, and its female on #4991 photo. Both should be moved.

09.02.2011 11:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #4991

Hey, still open question, if it belongs to Sematura genus or Nothus? http://www.guianensis.fr/photos_sematuridae.htm#Sematura lunus (hard to say). Grand dame it is, should be identified by the shot location.

09.02.2011 10:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5510

Yet something of Mechanitis, imho. In this case preview wouldn't be useless.

09.02.2011 9:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5489

That's it: http://www.guianensis.fr/photos_sphingidae_1.htm.

09.02.2011 9:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5489

This species is identified correctly.

09.02.2011 0:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5520

Petr, just added to my personal page similar one, way more funny. What to do with such photos, dunno:)

08.02.2011 23:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #3457

Obvious sylvestris (by antennae).

08.02.2011 22:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5489

Tomorrow (can't right now).

08.02.2011 21:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5052

New species added, correct, please, the year, should be 1905.

08.02.2011 21:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5052

Just a moment.

08.02.2011 17:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5507

Two genera added.

08.02.2011 17:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5507

Genus is questionable, sure. What genus should it belong to?

08.02.2011 16:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5052

This one is definite Dalceridae.

08.02.2011 16:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5019

Let's move.

08.02.2011 16:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5019

This species is identified correctly.

08.02.2011 16:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5020

Yes, that is right. Will add genus and species.

08.02.2011 14:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5502

Adjacent genus added. Also: male.

08.02.2011 13:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5508

Done (considering the last comment).

08.02.2011 12:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5507

This is also should be cleared: http://www.nic.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/noctuoidea/arctiidae/ctenuchinae/clystea/index.html#leucaspis. Opinions needed.

08.02.2011 10:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5485

Citheronia sp. ?phoronea (Cramer, 1779)?

08.02.2011 1:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5502

Approve: http://www.guianensis.fr/photos_arctiidae_pericopinae.htm.

08.02.2011 1:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5508

Ok then, let it be :)

08.02.2011 1:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5508

And Hampson, 1898, also: http://www.nic.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/noctuoidea/arctiidae/ctenuchinae/agyrta/index.html. Dunno.........

08.02.2011 1:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5508

Will check that in a minute (damn, damn double adding comments).

08.02.2011 1:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5508

That's the very it.

Next page

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.