Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493... 497
Fabricius, 1787 (year to finish).
Linnaeus, 1758 (the year indicate)
Guérin-Méneville, 1829 (corrected)
Goeze, 1779 (year to finish)
Genus added.
Genus added.
Genus done, move.
Ok then, let it be Phrygionis paradoxata (Guenée, [1858]), that's it. Will be corrected if needed.
Both names are to set as synonyms, Phrygionis paradoxata (Guenée, [1858]) and Phrygionis argentata (Drury, 1773). Not do subspecies though, incolorata, Prout, 1910 (unknown).
This species is identified correctly.
There is also argentata: http://www.nic.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/geometroidea/geometridae/ennominae/phrygionis/index.html#argentat. What should we consider default?
Yes, confusing. Your suggestion was my first thought, saw your link before and found out after this: http://mothphotographersgroup.msstate.edu/species.php?hodges=6671, thus offered argentata.
Some Phrygionis, suspect, Phrygionis argentata (Drury, 1773).
Hemiceras lissanella, Thiaucourt, 1994, imho. http://www.guianensis.fr/photos_notodontidae_2.htm.
Seems to me this one is Eulepidotis juliata (Stoll, 1790) http://www.guianensis.fr/photos_noctuidae_3.htm.
Same: http://www.saturniidae-web.de/Adeloneivaia%20catoxantha.htm.
Hm, not sure also, guys, choose one. It really varies, http://www.saturniidae-web.de/Adeloneivaia%20boisduvali.htm and http://www.guianensis.fr/photos_saturniidae_2.htm, French and Germans are of different opinions, so :)
And I think, this is Adeloneivaia catoxantha male (Rothschild,1907). No any closer: http://www.guianensis.fr/photos_saturniidae_2.htm.
Petr, no mistakes: I just copypasted another source.
Petr, should be two "i": http://www.nic.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/bombycoidea/saturniidae/ceratocampinae/adeloneivaia/index.
This one is also Zatrephes trailii Butler, 1877. Let's move there.
Some Dalceridae, can't continue further.
Ok then, no doubts: Limacodidae, Miresa clarissa, (Stoll, 1790), female.
Female.
Konstantin, that is well-known http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thysania_agrippina.
Idalus intermedia (Rothschild, 1909), seems to be one? Arctiidae.
For the record: just added this genus, begin Arctiidae work (will check new genera added).
Final adding of family means that species is identified successfully.
Saturniidae female.
Adeloneivaia boisduvalii (Doumet, 1859).
Dalceridae.
Yes, that's it, the most similar to http://www.inra.fr/internet/Produits/PAPILLON/arct_guy/boite_02/texte/z_traili.htm.
Acraga infusa [Schaus 1905]?
This species is identified correctly.
Celiptera levina (Stoll, 1782)?
That is the very underside (I was wrong), mishmash.
Can be Semaeopus subtincta, Warren, 1897.
Looks like one of its versions. See the similar one: http://www.guianensis.fr/images/Noctuidae/Guy%2001181_modi1-s3.jpg.
This species is identified correctly.
Obvious Arctiidae, something like Lophocampa maroniensis???
May be Antiblemma trogocycla, Hampson, 1926, but sooo questionable.
Sericoptera mahometaria, Herrich-Schäffer, [1853].
Hemeroblemma dolosa male, Hübner, [1823] (no suggestions more).
The same as #5071, I think, or something close to.
Antiblemma orbiculata (Felder & Rogenhofer, 1874)?
May be http://www.inra.fr/internet/Produits/PAPILLON/arct_guy/boite_01/texte/r_klages.htm or something close to.
Think, this is Robinsonia sp. (Arctiidae).
Va banque: Leuciris fimbriaria, Stoll, 1781.
Can be (who knows, this is America however).
Pure Arctiidae. Cresera ilioides (Schaus, 1905)?
News
- 31.12.2024: Если нужно загрузить на сайт много фотографий
- 10.12.2024: Новое поле в «Поиске энтомологов»
- 05.12.2024: Insecta.pro maps: filter by taxon
New photos (16.02.2025)
Fresh from the community
- 19:47, N. Grebennikov: Rhyparia purpurata....
- 13:17, P. Khramov: / → Chazara briseis / Nikolay Gr...
- 13:17, P. Khramov: Not identified → Plebejus argus / C...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- ICZN Election of Commissioners
- 20th International Insect Fair in Moscow (Russia, October 2023)
- The petition in defense of biological nomenclature
- Diamondback moths are sterilized to reduce crop loss
