Beetles of the Moscow and adjacent regions

All right. They hit well.

This post was edited by omar - 05/14/2007 18: 37

So it is, with truffles. They are available in the Moscow region, and not uncommon, you just need to be able to search.

How do I find them? Do not offer pigs and dogs

How do I find them? Don't offer pigs or dogs

Offer Odonteus armiger's

As for the number of beetles in the YAO, on the ZINA website, in the article "beetles of my grandmother's garden", I somewhat "messed up" about 2,800 of these species. Now some work has been done to collect information from all known articles, and the number has slightly decreased. At the moment, for the Yaroslavl region, it is indicated (according to the lit. sources = more than 50) approximately 2550 species.

At the request of Mr. Omar, I post several known Nebria livida habitats in the Moscow region. All of them are located in the north-northwest of the region in the area of the Klinsko-Dmitrovskaya ridge:
1. Mitina Gora quarry. Dmitrov district, approximately 30 km along Rogachevsky highway from Lobnya VII. 84
2. Spas-Kamensky quarry. Dmitrov district, 3 km south-west of Iksha station 23. VIII. 89 (now the quarry is flooded)
3. Istra district A sand pit in the village district. Velyaminovo. 13.VIII.06
4. The coast of the Istra vdhr. in the district of the village. Novorakovo (message to V. Makarova)
5. Voskresenskiy district, quarry in the village district. Elkino - here were collected the larvae of Nebria livida (message to V. Makarova)
6. Voskresenskiy district, quarry in the village district. Achkasovo (limestone) 03. IX. 09
This is all for now, but there are still many quarries, and this Nebria should be in many of them

This post was edited by Archypus-08.09.2009 22: 02

Thank you very much! In Fedorenko's list, the view is given for the region by a single point. I myself did not meet these beetles in the region, and Nikitsky also did not find them. Your information is very useful. I think it is a real candidate for inclusion in the Red Book of the region.

Ha, just how to guard it?! This is the case when human activity only contributes to the conservation and spread of the species. Everyone dig a career!

This post was edited by Archypus - 05/18/2007 21: 28

Elizar, thank you for the clarification. And how many species, according to these sources, in the nuclear power plant in the trace. families:
Elephants
Leaf eaters
Floaters
Water lovers
Nutcrackers
Thank you for your time.

Amara, in the ground beetle family for the Moscow region addition: two new species found. Add it to your account.

Question to Muscovites: what is the actual occurrence of the ground beetle Carabus arvensis in the Moscow region, its biotopes and real areas of its location? In the work of D. N. Fedorenko ("Fauna of ground beetles of the Moscow region"), it is stated that the species is mostly confined to pine forests on sandy soil and occurs"everywhere, often dominating other ground beetle species". The fact is that in the list of ground beetles for the adjacent Tula region, this species is not listed at all. In the northern and northwestern parts of the region, in the zone of mixed pine-broad-leaved forests, the species is supposed to live. I've never come across one. In the neighboring Kaluga region, the type exists.

Asked,we answer: Fedorenko did not make a mistake here. In the Moscow region, the view is really massive in some places. It is in such biotopes that it dominates all other carabus species for sure, including the ubiquitous common hortensis. In the south of the Moscow region, the view is common. These are, in particular: Kolomensky, Yegoryevsky and Lukhovitsky districts. Personally, I don't have any information about the Serebryano-Prudsky district, but I can ask N. B. Nikitsky, he often collects there. But I will appear on the air only next week-vacation

Freeze frame from Lukhovitsky district. The full snapshot doesn't fit

The updated list is moved here.

File/s:



 Beetles_of_Moscow_Region.xls

size: 39k
number of downloads: 577

I got the impression that there was some kind of mistake with the snappers in your list. It is very difficult to take for granted the presence of 49 species of silkworms in the Moscow region. Must be at least 60.

I wonder if anyone has recently caught Osmoderma in the region?

So they asked me to write about Odonteus armiger.
The beetle is rare in the Moscow region. There are only 3 copies in my collection. It occurs in deciduous and mixed forests and is associated with some fungi(I have heard that it is associated with truffles, although I have not heard about finding them in the Arctic). I myself caught them in the light from June to July. Females are flying back. Males are very rare(in the period from 2000 to 2006. only one). Although when the years are very plentiful, these small beetles simply do not notice. And they are very nimble and do not stay long at the lamp.

add-on about Odonteus armiger.
This weekend I caught a male in the light. So we can say that they start flying on May 26.

Hi!

I wonder if anyone has recently caught Osmoderma in the region?

"Recently", 15 years ago, Misha Shestopalov in PTZ

Well, these are all fairy tales overgrown with reality. I'm interested in the last 2-3 years.

add-on about Odonteus armiger.
This weekend I caught a male in the light. So we can say that they start flying on May 26.

Now I read from Gornostaev (I'll post an article later) that O. armiger is active not at night but at dusk.

alex 2611, you're right, there really should be more snappers (as well as some others). I just quote from the sources (lists of species) that I have. For example, if it is indicated that a beetle is found throughout the Palearctic, but it is not (yet!) listed in specific lists, then it is not considered. I confess that I don't have any articles right now. I hope to get it in the future.

People! Is Carabus hortensis a rare species or a banal one? And then it's called a garden ground beetle, and I caught it last weekend for the first time for the first time.

People! Is Carabus hortensis a rare species or a banal one? It's called a garden beetle, and I caught it for the first time last weekend.

The view for the Moscow region is banal. I didn't come across it, because the species is forest and does not live in agrocenoses, despite the name "garden". It tends to coniferous or mixed forests with sandy soil. In places where it is found, it often dominates other species of the genus.

That's right, Entalex. Osmoderma eremita is stably found in the Lukhovitsky district of the Moscow region. And sometimes it's not even uncommon.

Stenolophus skrimshiranus
is a new species for the Moscow region. The northernmost nakhodka is indicated for Kiev. (Matalin, 1996) The funny thing is that I found the first beetle in my garden.
I thought about it, went out to the swamp under the windows and found the population. Unfortunately, despite the abundance in the specified biotope, the survey in nature was crowned with complete failure - the beetles are very mobile and immediately ran away. I'll post a high-quality photo soon.

Point on Agrilus convexicollis Redt. - Moscow region, Istra district, railway station Manikhino-1, on yasen (Fraxinus pensylvanica) 11.06.2007

Omar, and stenolofus from what source was determined?

This post was edited by Archypus-02.07.2007 11: 54

To be honest, I couldn't identify it myself, so I hit the green and came to a dead end. It's not there. I took a copy. Nikitsky and I also brought up the Arnoldi collection of the Stenolophus genus from the USSR fauna to the museum. By comparison, it turned out that he. And then I remembered that I had a printed article by Matalin (very good), an overview of the genus Stenolophus of the fauna of Russia and neighboring states. It is still posted on colepterologists thanks to the courtesy of Denis Potanin. I looked at it and made sure that it really is, and also about its distribution.

2amara
I apologize, I did not see the request and therefore did not give information for so long...
Slonikov in the YAO - 300, listoyedov 220, plavuntsov 100, vodolyubov 90.
The volume of families is "green", because now all these families have been divided, the information is approximate, m. b. + - a dozen, I don't know more precisely, because I don't seriously deal with these families, I don't have time... There are 54 types of snappers (including a couple of "muddy" names that I can't synonymize in any way...)

Elizar, thank you.

Question to Muscovites: what is the actual occurrence of the ground beetle Carabus arvensis in the Moscow region, its biotopes and real areas of its location? In the work of D. N. Fedorenko ("Fauna of ground beetles of the Moscow region"), it is stated that the species is mostly confined to pine forests on sandy soil and occurs"everywhere, often dominating other ground beetle species". The fact is that in the list of ground beetles for the adjacent Tula region, this species is not listed at all. In the northern and northwestern parts of the region, in the zone of mixed pine-broad-leaved forests, the species is supposed to live. I've never come across one. In the neighboring Kaluga region, the species exists.

Yes, this species is collected by soil traps in the Serebryano-Prudsky district, in pine plantations on the sand.

Does anyone know if olenka (Epicometis hirta (Poda)) is found in the Moscow region?

I didn't see Olenka... But there are a lot of smelly bronzes )

Does anyone know if olenka (Epicometis hirta (Poda)) is found in the Moscow region?

As much as you want. It is about this species that they write that it is actively spreading to the north.
Beetles on flowers.

Epicometis hirta does not seem to occur. In any case, I do not know any reliable copies. Nikitsky also never caught it. Mikhail, I think this is a misunderstanding, you are mistaken.

As much as you want. It is about this species that they write that it is actively spreading to the north.
Beetles on flowers.

mikee you probably just confused with smelly bronze.

Epicometis hirta does not seem to occur. In any case, I do not know any reliable copies. Nikitsky also never caught it.

I've also never seen Epicometis hirta (Poda) in the Moscow region.
But today I came across one note that really confused me.
Of course, I understand that this is not a scientific or even popular science magazine, but the author's authority is beyond doubt.
Or is it the same as the stag beetle?
Reference: Flower Club Magazine No. 7 (64) 2007, p. 4.

Pictures:

Epicometis.jpg — (131.91к)

Yes, it is very interesting, probably with the planting material delivered.
Maybe omar can specify

Olenka, in principle, can be confused with smelly... if desired) it is necessary to examine the flowers more carefully)

You can confuse it, but I don't think that Sergey Sergeyevich Izhevsky didn't know what he was talking about. Apparently, a question was asked about damage to roses in the garden and exactly in the answer - for the last two years in the Moscow region....

In my opinion, it is really possible to find it in the PTZ.