Beetles of the Moscow and adjacent regions

In my opinion, it is really possible to find it in the PTZ.

Does anyone have a list of MOD cons? I only know about: menetriesi, convexus, nemoralis, coriaceus, nitens, glabratus, hortensis, granulatus

The link to the list of Fedorenko is not working unfortunately

I forwarded the article, take a look. This shake-up with generic names is not the last, according to the author.
Well, for example, Isaev (2007) also finds this species in Chuvashia and the Ul. region, so I think that it still exists in the Russian Federation.

I found the remains of a beetle under the window. From the peephole on my head, I realized that it was a kozheed. According to the tables and what remains of the beetle, it seems to have been reduced to Megatoma (but I do not exclude that I was mistaken), According to the drawing on the nadkr, and the description in the "Far Eastern Beetles", it is closest to M. (Pseudohadrotoma) graeseri. But definitely not undata cat. given by Nikitsky for the Moscow region. Question: who and what species of this genus were found in Moscow and the region?

I found the remains of a beetle under the window. From the peephole on my head, I realized that it was a kozheed. According to the tables and what remains of the beetle, it seems to have been reduced to Megatoma (but I do not exclude that I was mistaken), According to the drawing on the nadkr, and the description in the "Far Eastern Beetles", it is closest to M. (Pseudohadrotoma) graeseri. But definitely not undata cat. given by Nikitsky for the Moscow region. Question: who and what species of this genus were found in Moscow and the region?

So I signed my own like graeseri. This creature is not only in the houses, but also in nature has taken root: it lives under the bark and does not complain. He also goes on trains without a ticket!:)

Here's a picture http://www.dermestidae.com/Megatomagraeseri.html , you can compare it with the first one.
Mine (got without a mustache) after comparing (and dots on the prsp. it is noticeably smaller than Megatoma) turned out to be Reesa vespulae, another transcontinental lover of collections (it is not in the "green" list).

On kozheedam you can use this book here:
http://www.zin.ru/Animalia/Coleoptera/rus/zhant_76.htm

And this one (some species missing from the fauna of the Russian Federation are shown):
http://www.zin.ru/Animalia/Coleoptera/rus/yamord99.htm

Here's a picture http://www.dermestidae.com/Megatomagraeseri.html , you can compare it with the first one.
Mine (got without a mustache) after comparing (and dots on the prsp. it is noticeably smaller than Megatoma) turned out to be Reesa vespulae, another transcontinental lover of collections (it is not in the "green" list).

No like.

Thanks!!! Then, apparently, the first find for the European part of Russia!!!

Two questions.
1. What source was used to determine the results?
2. Caught in the Ulyanovsk region?

1. По C. Besuchet : Die Kaefer Mitteleuropas. In addition, the animal is quite characteristic.
2. Yes, the Shilovskaya Forest-Steppe Nature Reserve. The places are good... in the dust of the dry road of a shrinking maple tree together with Lasius ? niger

In addition, from the same season - Chennai bituberculatum Latr. It was also not specified for the ETR.

2Fornax13
If you so wish, I can send Reesa and really live, only then do not complain if they eat something. According to my data, the most terrible enemy is ent. fees, especially on "mattresses"