Identification of Hymenoptera (wasps, bees, ants)

Hello. Please tell me the names of these phones. All of them were taken at our CMS. Sincerely, Andreas.

Do you want to see the view?

3 It appears to be Anoplius concinnus (Dahlbom, 1843), f

Panurgus calcaratus probably

Hello there. Please help me with the names. I didn't shoot these ants, but a friend did in mid - June, so I can't say the size. Everything was shot on the slope of Dubrovka/Shaven mountain. The grassy vegetation is well preserved there. Ant # 5 on an orris bud is not real.
Can you at least get to the family of an egg-eater? I took it on the way back in the wooded area between the fields.

It also seems to me (as an amateur) that Anoplius nigerrimus has much thicker hind legs than our own. In addition, nigerrimus likes wet biotopes - and in that place there was a very dry, rocky southern slope of the foot of Mount Yutsa.

is everything so complicated with them? is it really only determined by the genitals?

Nomada sp. from mayevok)

Ukraine, Poltava region, Poltava, Leninsky district, right bank of the river. Vorskla, listv. forest, on the inflorescence of Taraxacum officinale.
09. V. 2011

what is the correct Cryptocheilus (A.) var i pennis (as indicated in the qualifier) or C. (A.) var ii pennis (as suggested by the internet)?

It is similar to Nomada ruficornis (Linnaeus 1758).
Note that in the" green "determinant, this species is called Nomada bifida Thomson 1872
And Nomada ruficornis from "green" is a different species.
I don't think it's worth repeating that this is just a guess.

what is the correct Cryptocheilus (A.) var i pennis (as indicated in the qualifier) or C. (A.) var ii pennis (as suggested by the internet)?

thanks for the suggestion, too. it looks very similar. do you think other nomads should not be loaded here, or should they be shown just for fun?

To paraphrase Alex 2611, " What does your photo have to do with the genus Cryptocheilus?"

And again they got into the milk, but when you take up the webbing, there's an eye and an eye . To paraphrase Alex 2611, " What does your photo have to do with the genus Cryptocheilus?" So be it, I will direct you to the right path, in the photo a representative of the sem. Crabronidae, Dinetus possibly pictus, female.

Please define it. 30.10.12. Rostov region.

People-please tell me - who exactly (myrmycologists) can I contact regarding the definition of an ant from a photo?
- To the ANTCLUB website.EN login/register (especially because of one password) is not difficult/does not work.
"I've only heard about Dlussky," but the man is already 75, " and it's not convenient to disturb him without being familiar...

             

kaaak


what then is the determinant to use to..

  

P.S. and I really thought that everything was fine.. when did you get to the last point

I'm not an expert, but try to contact me first (if it's not very difficult), then you can try yourself with the determinant on http://www.antvid.org/
Then you can contact specialists.

You see, this volume of the determinant was published in 1978 (I don't think I'm lying). Over the past 34 years, our understanding of OS taxonomy has changed slightly. The Specidae family was divided into 3 separate families. Nothing terrible happened. In any case, your wasp can not be attributed to pompilids, in any case, you should have entered the subfamily Crabroninae of the Specidae family. And the fact that this subfamily has been given the status of an independent family should not worry you too much.
Of course, the" green " determinant is rather imperfect, but first learn how to correctly determine the os before the genus. And then they will certainly help you on the forum, prompt you, send you modern literature.

And the size is not confused???? Your copy is probably smaller than the specified 11-18 mm.

So I'm just an amateur! "
Besides, I only have a picture!"
Here is this Messor want to know the name. - They live within the city limits of Pyatigorsk on the southern slope of Goryachaya Mountain, formed by travertines-deposits of hot mineral (hydrogen sulfide) springs gushing on the slopes of Mashuk. Collect seeds of cereals. They crawl slowly. They appear even on warm winter days.
In http://www.antvid.org/ (comparing from the photo) - there is almost no choice for reflection - only Messor structor is suitable.

Judging by the inscription under the photo, this is Messor ))
But seriously, all single-color reapers with a matte head in Russia can be attributed to Messor structor. The only thing that can be misleading is that the two-colored reaper species (with a red breast) have small individuals that are also black and unicolored. But they are more shiny compared to Messor structor.
I think it's Messor structor in the photo.

  /and where can I read about it?

  
and why I was so wrong, I also understood only now.. Yesterday, in poor light, I didn't notice any shoulder bumps

  There is also a venation of the front wings, well, very different. In general, if you are interested in hymenoptera, then carefully study the venation of the wings, even in the "green" determinant, and try to understand where the various veins and cells are located and what they are called. Believe me, it will help a lot.

Sergey listen to the words of Alexey and I also advised you to pay attention to wing venation (number, shape and size of cells) before, but you rested and pay attention to the location of spots, etc. very changeable things for the diagnosis. good luck to you

Dy I think I know venation

Your posts and questions suggest otherwise

Alomya, right?