E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Identification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Community and ForumInsects identificationIdentification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Pages: 1 ...193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201... 854

11.09.2009 19:13, scarit

We also have N. in the region.violacea and rufipes. And the second one is caught on corpses.

11.09.2009 19:17, akulich-sibiria

well, rufipes didn't catch my eye right now, maybe there are some places in the training camp. I met Sergey Kurbatov here in Moscow. Dmitry, do we have something to make from palps and where can we catch them? In the birch stumps?? do you have any?

11.09.2009 19:38, scarit

They are often caught in anthills, litter and soil. In the wood dust, though I did not come across there. We have them, we need to make the mattresses more comfortable.

11.09.2009 20:13, Fornax13

In general, we need to find an entomol.a sieve and punch everything on it. Many species that I thought were rare are actually downright commonplace if you sow a suitable substrate. It is necessary to sow forest litter (especially near water bodies), moss, discards along the banks of water bodies, rotting wood chips, etc. Many euplectins and batrizins are caught under the bark and in the dust of hollows (especially if there is a thread near the subcortical anthill). Even sometimes good results are obtained by simply mowing at dusk. In ground anthills, it is better to collect in the spring.
You should have at least 25-30 views, I think.

This post was edited by Fornax13-11.09.2009 20: 14
Likes: 3

11.09.2009 20:15, evk

That's why I was puzzled just now I'm sitting here remembering. we have the same rufipes like lives?... Somewhere it seems there was such a thing. Is it connected to the pines?

N. rufipes, like other Necrobia - necrophages-are found everywhere, with plants (trees) are not connected in any way.

11.09.2009 20:18, Fornax13

Korynetes is associated with wood, and it is basically similar to necrobia. Only usually on deciduous trees.

12.09.2009 16:06, vasiliy-feoktistov

Recently, I was sorting out my old collections and came across this-here is a mustache. Was caught: 06.06.2001 Moscow region Balashikha district of the okr. der. Poltevo, a mixed forest with a predominance of coniferous trees (1exp. "Flew" into my head). Please tell me what kind of animal?

12.09.2009 16:16, Алексей Сажнев

Ropalopus (s. str.) clavipes (Fabricius, 1775) probably female

the antennae are not quite visible, but it seems that the denticles are visible, starting from 3 segments

This post was edited by Alexey Sazhnev - 12.09.2009 16: 17
Likes: 1

12.09.2009 16:19, vasiliy-feoktistov

Ropalopus (s. str.) clavipes (Fabricius, 1775) probably female

Flat (callidium type), length approx: 12mm.

12.09.2009 16:21, Алексей Сажнев

well, in the Callidiini tribe, everything is so flat ))
Likes: 1

12.09.2009 16:22, Алексей Сажнев

Well, the type of clavipesmacropus, about the sex is not exactly defined, I think the female is still

This post was edited by Alexey Sazhnev - 12.09.2009 16: 31
Likes: 1

12.09.2009 16:26, vasiliy-feoktistov

well, in the Callidiini tribe, everything is so flat ))

Thank you, Alexey. It's new to me in my region. I'll check on Zina now.

12.09.2009 16:30, Алексей Сажнев

Vasily, better look at his sawyere for Ropalopus (s. str.) macropus (Germar, 1824) - you have 3 species of Ropalopus in Moscow region, these two are close. If the denticles are on the segments (3-8) of the antennae, the scutellum is bare, then clavipes, if there are no denticles, and the scutellum is in recumbent hairs, then macropus

This post was edited by Alexey Sazhnev - 12.09.2009 16: 34
Likes: 1

12.09.2009 16:41, RippeR

mustache needs a better look. If clavipes, then we can congratulate you on an excellent find-like the 2nd copy for MO
Likes: 1

12.09.2009 17:05, vasiliy-feoktistov

Thanks guys-this is still macropus. I remove the disrespect from here and place it in callidins.

12.09.2009 17:10, omar

No, not the second one. in the 30s, clavipes was still caught.

12.09.2009 17:11, omar

And macropus like dolko for Serebryano-Prudsky district was caught. True, many

12.09.2009 17:12, RippeR

then the second one from a long time smile.gifago is

12.09.2009 17:13, Алексей Сажнев

well, yes, Danilevsky, the link is only to the publication of 1930 (the last one), and so there he seems to still mention 1904 or around togo

12.09.2009 17:27, vasiliy-feoktistov

I moved the image here: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtop...=0&#entry940331
Likes: 1

13.09.2009 11:59, grendaizer

Not whether martviliensis... mol.gif beer.gif jump.gif

Pictures:
picture: P9131439.JPG
P9131439.JPG — (178.16к)

picture: P9131445.JPG
P9131445.JPG — (139.55к)

13.09.2009 12:05, evk

And from where? The dot should be written umnik.gif

13.09.2009 12:10, grendaizer

Who knows this couple?

Pictures:
picture: P9131448.JPG
P9131448.JPG — (136.85к)

13.09.2009 12:11, Алексей Сажнев

Carabus (Tribax) sp. ?

13.09.2009 12:11, evk

And you think it might be Neoplectes? shuffle.gif This is about martviliensis!
And identify tribaxs without information about the collection point? ...

This post was edited by evk-13.09.2009 12: 13

13.09.2009 12:16, grendaizer

[quote=evk,13.09.2009 13:05]

13.09.2009 12:19, grendaizer

And you think it might be Neoplectes? shuffle.gif This is about martviliensis!
And identify tribaxs without information about the collection point? ...


Tribaks are caught in Svaneti tomorrow.

13.09.2009 12:23, Victor Titov

Not whether martviliensis... mol.gif  beer.gif  jump.gif

Who knows this couple?

Dear friends, there is a separate topic "Definition of ground beetles of the genus Carabus":
http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtop...00&#entry938551
Likes: 1

13.09.2009 12:24, evk

[quote=grendaizer, 13.09.2009 13: 16] And from where? You need to write a dotumnik.gif
[

Don't be discouragedrolleyes.gif, Mr. Georgia. June-July. mostly oak forest.
[/quote]
So I'm talking about the point - Georgia is big, the photo is not detailed, and there is not one species of the subgenus Sphodristocarabus, which includes your beetles! The subgenus is confusing, with the status of species/subspecies being debated all the time.
Likes: 1

13.09.2009 12:25, evk

Dear friends, there is a separate topic "Definition of ground beetles of the genus Carabus":
http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtop...00&#entry938551

That's it! shuffle.gif

13.09.2009 12:32, omar

Carabus janthinus is almost certainly the one that martviliensis
is more difficult to deal with with tribaxes, you need a better understanding to study the structure of elytra. But you can assume - carabus agnatus

13.09.2009 13:49, evk

Carabus janthinus is almost certainly the one that martviliensis
is more difficult to deal with with tribaxes, you need a better understanding to study the structure of elytra. But we can assume - carabus agnatus

Exactly. according to probability theory wink.gif

13.09.2009 14:01, grendaizer

What kind of "dung trucks"? Please define it. Svaneti, in the mountains, like 3000m.

Pictures:
picture: P9131446.JPG
P9131446.JPG — (205.07к)

13.09.2009 14:04, Алексей Сажнев

what about Geotrupes mutator
Likes: 1

13.09.2009 14:05, evk

I would not be surprised if this is a banal Geotrupes mutator - it is common enough high up in the Caucasus. It is necessary to look at the grooves in the prishchitkovo-humeral part of the elytra! Your pictures don't show it. Shoot one bug, but with high quality!

13.09.2009 14:45, grendaizer

I would not be surprised if this is a banal Geotrupes mutator - it is common enough high up in the Caucasus. It is necessary to look at the grooves in the prishchitkovo-humeral part of the elytra! Your pictures don't show it. Shoot one bug, but with high quality!


I apologize for the terrible quality of the photos, I broke my camera during a recent ascent. I temporarily use a borrowed soap dish.

Pictures:
picture: P9131458.JPG
P9131458.JPG — (136.23к)

picture: P9131453.JPG
P9131453.JPG — (137.28к)

13.09.2009 15:38, omar

Exactly. on the theory of probability wink.gif

No. Not only. There are only two species from this subgenus. Armeniacus is rarely purple

13.09.2009 18:10, evk

I apologize for the terrible quality of the photos, I broke my camera during a recent ascent. I temporarily use a borrowed soap dish.

As I said - G. mutator. You can see it now.

13.09.2009 18:13, evk

No. Not only. There are only two species from this subgenus. armeniacus is rarely purple

And armeniacusa has a hell of a lot of subspecies wink.gif. But this, of course, is janthinus!

13.09.2009 18:42, omar

And armeniacusa has a hell of a lot of subspecies wink.gif. But this, of course, is janthinus!

Then what was it about? I'm kind of up to the subspecies and didn't try to say anything. confused.gif

Pages: 1 ...193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201... 854

New comment

Note: you should have a Insecta.pro account to upload new topics and comments. Please, create an account or log in to add comments.

* Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages.

Random species of the website catalog

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.