E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Identification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Community and ForumInsects identificationIdentification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Pages: 1 ...238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246... 854

04.02.2010 13:12, Sugercete

The tips of the appendages in No. 2 are broken off!

So, as the dear Anthrenus
said, here is a slightly better scan and without water drops:

user posted image

This post was edited by Sugercete-02/04/2010 13: 44

04.02.2010 13:14, John-ST

Potosia cuprina


Thank you, I think I came to this as well, but I still have my doubts.
S. I. Medvedev writes in the Fauna of the USSR that kuprins live in rotten wood, but I still got this one from the anthill

This post was edited by John-ST-04.02.2010 14: 20

04.02.2010 13:39, Sugercete

Can a final collective verdict be adopted?

Such:

1. D. Circumcinctus / 09.2007 caught with a net in the reservoir Sychevskoe Reservoir
2. D. Marginalis / female furrowed form / 09.2006 under pieces of ruberoyd
3. D. Marginalis / female smooth form/09.2006 under pieces of ruberoyd

All three of them: MO Volokolamsk district

This post was edited by Sugercete-02/04/2010 13: 43
Likes: 2

04.02.2010 16:09, Victor Titov

Thank you, I think I came to this as well, but I still have my doubts.
S. I. Medvedev writes in the Fauna of the USSR that kuprins live in rotten wood, but I still got this one from the anthill

It happens! I, for example, found lugubris in an anthill, although it also seems to have nothing to do there.... They found imagos, not larvae. You never know how an adult beetle could fly in/crawl in there.

This post was edited by Dmitrich-02/04/2010 16: 11

04.02.2010 16:45, Sugercete

Please help me identify these people. They are small. I need a microscope, but I don't have one yet.

If necessary, I'll scan them separately.

user posted image

04.02.2010 17:16, botanque

From the top left, it seems - Ilybius ater, to the right-Colymbetes ? paykulli. The bottom ones are large-Acilius female and male, look at the keys, there are two of them in total. I'd like to take a closer look at a small beetle.
Likes: 1

04.02.2010 17:52, Sugercete

From the top left, it seems - Ilybius ater, to the right-Colymbetes ? paykulli. The bottom ones are large-Acilius female and male, look at the keys, there are two of them in total. I'd like to take a closer look at a small beetle.


Thank you very much.
I'll try Acilius using the keys myself.

But the small one:

user posted image

04.02.2010 18:02, Alexandr Rusinov

It is most likely Ilybius fuliginosus (Fabricius, 1792). The beetle is young and not yet strong, which caused the elytra to deform.
Likes: 1

04.02.2010 18:06, botanque

I agree.
Likes: 1

04.02.2010 18:51, Victor Titov

Please help me identify these people. They are small. I need a microscope, but I don't have one yet.

Thank you very much.
I'll try Acilius using the keys myself.

Acilius (s) should be viewed from below. In A. sulcatus, the posterior thighs are darkened at the base, the first visible part of the abdomen (ventriclecool.gif) is black, and the rest are only with yellow spots. However, the female has another reliable sign: the pronotum is on the sides with densely hairy depressions. And in A. canaliculatus, the hind thighs and this same ventritus ( lol.gif) are yellow. In the female, the pronotum is without hairy indentations, or they are barely noticeable. And besides these two species from Acilius, we have no one else.
By the way, these are still far from small swimmers. For them, an ordinary hand-held magnifying glass is enough, why a microscope? confused.gif I would say very large ones. Here is Laccophilinae, Hydroporinae ( wall.gif) - this is yes!

This post was edited by Dmitrich - 02/04/2010 18: 54
Likes: 1

04.02.2010 19:24, Sugercete

Acilius (s) should be viewed from below. In A. sulcatus, the posterior thighs are darkened at the base, the first visible part of the abdomen (ventriclecool.gif) is black, and the rest are only with yellow spots. However, the female has another reliable sign: the pronotum is on the sides with densely hairy depressions. And in A. canaliculatus, the hind thighs and this same ventritus ( lol.gif) are yellow. In the female, the pronotum is without hairy indentations, or they are barely noticeable. And besides these two species from Acilius, we have no one else.
By the way, these are still far from small swimmers. For them, an ordinary hand-held magnifying glass is enough, why a microscope? confused.gif I would say very large ones. Here is Laccophilinae, Hydroporinae ( wall.gif) - this is yes!


From below, this is not a problem.
I'll soak them off and peel off the die.

I'll catch more water beetles in the summer.

Thank you very much

I looked through many photos on the Internet on two Ditiskusam (M and S). And I noticed one feature. In Marginalis, both males and females, the posterior third of the elytra is translucent yellow , as if the black paint has worn wink.gifoff, but the Circumcinctus is completely black. Well painted. Can this be a sign for quick identification?

04.02.2010 19:49, Victor Titov

I looked through many photos on the Internet on two Ditiskusam (M and S). And I noticed one feature. In Marginalis, both males and females, the posterior third of the elytra is translucent yellow , as if the black paint has worn wink.gifoff, but the Circumcinctus is completely black. Well painted. Can this be a sign for quick identification?

I don't think so, to put it mildly. smile.gif
Likes: 1

04.02.2010 20:53, Ilia Ustiantcev

Who is it? Moscow, caught yesterday.
picture: DSC07482.JPG

04.02.2010 22:33, Evgenich

Who is it? Moscow, caught it yesterday.

Oenopia conglobata

This post was edited by Evgenich - 04.02.2010 22: 34
Likes: 1

04.02.2010 22:38, Алексей Сажнев

yes, very honest Oenopia conglobata (Linnaeus, 1758)
Likes: 1

05.02.2010 1:12, vasiliy-feoktistov

Scanning the top view

No. 1 length 35 mm

user posted image

No. 2 length 35 mm

user posted image

No. 3 length 31 mm

user posted image

D. marginalis

05.02.2010 1:35, vasiliy-feoktistov

I will try to fulfill my duty of honor (without quotation marks) to Irina.
Females of the two most frequent swimmers in the Moscow region:
1) Dytiscus marginalis marginalis Linnaeus, 1758
2) Dytiscus circumcinctus Ahrens, 1811

Pictures:
picture: 1.jpg
1.jpg — (82к)

picture: 2.jpg
2.jpg — (68.44 k)

Likes: 1

05.02.2010 1:42, John-ST

Please tell me, as far as I understand Protaetia metallica is now P. cuprea metallica?

05.02.2010 1:49, Алексей Сажнев

In my opinion, this is not the case, although such information is often found on Western sites, so you should still recognize P. metallica and P. cuprea as separate species (which is obviously correct).
Likes: 2

05.02.2010 2:24, Sugercete

D. marginalis


What? All three of them?
No way confused.gif
But what about the appendages that are sharp and concave, like the dagger of a Dzhigit(the first one)?

Here:
user posted image

It's not a joke to have such spikes!

smile.gif

This post was edited by Sugercete-02/05/2010 02: 28

05.02.2010 8:47, vasiliy-feoktistov

What? All three of them?
No way confused.gif
But what about the appendages that are sharp and concave, like the dagger of a Dzhigit(the first one)?

Here:
user posted image

It's not a joke to have such spikes!

smile.gif

No, not all of them (he's in the middle). That's what I said when I was half asleep. With the rest I pass.

05.02.2010 9:26, vasiliy-feoktistov

This elephant "came" to me yesterday.
Caught in January, Egypt, Nile Delta.
Can't you tell me anything about it?"

Pictures:
picture: P2052287.jpg
P2052287.jpg — (82.1к)

05.02.2010 11:31, DNN

Please identify the bug.

user posted image
29.08.2009. MO

Thanks

This post was edited by DNN-05.02.2010 12: 27

05.02.2010 11:40, Bad Den

Please identify the bug.

Thanks

Platycis minutus (Lycidae)
Likes: 2

05.02.2010 11:53, Victor Titov

I will try to fulfill my duty of honor (without quotation marks) to Irina.
Females of the two most frequent swimmers in the Moscow region:
1) Dytiscus marginalis marginalis Linnaeus, 1758
2) Dytiscus circumcinctus Ahrens, 1811

Vasily, you'd better move them to the topic of water beetles... shuffle.gif
http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtop...0&#entry1005061

05.02.2010 12:01, vasiliy-feoktistov

Vasily, you'd better move them to the topic of water beetles... shuffle.gif
http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtop...0&#entry1005061

Viktor, I just posted them here as an example (there was a dispute).
And in the topic of water beetles, I'll post them (and males to boot). smile.gif
Likes: 1

05.02.2010 18:51, Mantispid

This elephant "came" to me yesterday.
Caught in January, Egypt, Nile Delta.
Can't you tell me anything about it?"

Some Lixus sp.
Likes: 1

05.02.2010 19:03, vasiliy-feoktistov

Some Lixus sp.

Thank you, I honestly think about the "frachnik" myself, but can you tell me where you can look in that region?

06.02.2010 12:29, Tigran Oganesov

mattress discussion moved
http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=339580&st=2250
Likes: 3

06.02.2010 13:59, Александр57

Sorry, I'll turn to the topic of plavuntsov again. As a pinning of the completed task. Two Nizhny Novgorod floating boats:
So, No. 1 is such a female! And I was in a stupor, having read children's books. Interestingly, the view can be viewed from the top? There is no image at the bottom. 33 mm. Found maimed and dying in the fall.
And No. 2-circumcinctus, judging by the sharp daggers? 36 mm.

Pictures:
picture: 1.jpg
1.jpg — (69.79 k)

picture: 2.jpg
2.jpg — (75.27 k)

picture: 2a.jpg
2a.jpg — (312.59к)

06.02.2010 14:14, botanque

The first is the female D. marginalis, which is distinguished by yellow stripes in front of the eyes and a wide body. The second, yes-D. circumcinctus, male.

This post was edited by botanque - 06.02.2010 14: 48

06.02.2010 17:27, sergey nyu

Please help me identify and decide. I suspect that all the photos of D. circumcinctus are male and female. After the photo of the front side, the underside of the same beetle is presented. Beetles caught in the Leningrad region.Priozersky district, villagePriladozhskoye (ponds). Many thanks to Evgenich for the copies provided. mol.gif mol.gif mol.gif
1.picture: DSC00793.JPG
2picture: DSC00794.JPG
3picture: DSC00796.JPG
4.picture: DSC00797.JPG
5.picture: DSC00798.JPG
6.picture: DSC00799.JPG
7.picture: DSC00800.JPG
8.picture: DSC00801.JPG

This post was edited by sergey nyu-06.02.2010 17: 32

06.02.2010 17:48, Sugercete

Is there a possibility to make basins closer? Do you have a scanner?
I'm also interested in seeing other examples wink.gif

06.02.2010 18:22, Victor Titov

Please help me identify and decide. I suspect that all the photos of D. circumcinctus are male and female. After the photo of the front side, the underside of the same beetle is presented.

For accuracy, I would like a larger photo of the processes of the rear basins. And so-too small, reflections, you can make a mistake. In my opinion, for example, No. 1 (top) and No. 2 (bottom)are male D. marginalis... I will prefer not to express my opinion about the rest of them until larger and clearer photos (if possible) confused.gif.
Likes: 2

06.02.2010 20:21, Victor Titov

The photo is not clear, but still. Is it possible to determine what kind of Dapsa it is? Crimea, Koktebel village, vecherniy let na svet, 17. VII. 2009
picture: Изображение_018.јрд

06.02.2010 23:16, sergey nyu

Is there a possibility to make basins closer? Do you have a scanner?
I'm also interested in seeing other examples wink.gif

Unfortunately, there is no scanner, other examples have not yet been straightened out, I will deal with them tomorrow.

06.02.2010 23:19, Алексей Сажнев

Dmitrich

Daps in my opinion trimaculata Motschulsky, 1835 or horvathi Csiki, 1901 - they are genital both
Likes: 2

06.02.2010 23:38, Victor Titov

Dmitrich

Daps in my opinion trimaculata Motschulsky, 1835 or horvathi Csiki, 1901 - they are both genital

Thank you, Alexey! beer.gif

06.02.2010 23:41, sergey nyu

Please help me identify ground beetles caught in the KCR, the place of capture and date are visible on the labels. On plants. mol.gif mol.gif
1.picture: DSC00829.JPG
2.picture: DSC00825.JPG
3.picture: DSC00824.JPG
4.picture: DSC00830.JPG

06.02.2010 23:45, Victor Titov

By the way, according to ZINA's website, Dapsa horvathi is distributed in Russia from the Altai to Primorye, and Dapsa trimaculata - in the south of the European part. Maybe in the Crimea? horvathi and not, but only D. trimaculata? confused.gif

Pages: 1 ...238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246... 854

New comment

Note: you should have a Insecta.pro account to upload new topics and comments. Please, create an account or log in to add comments.

* Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages.

Random species of the website catalog

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.