E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Identification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Community and Forum → Insects identification → Identification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Pages: 1 ...683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691... 854

23.09.2016 12:06, Mantispid

Ilya how are things going with Cyphocleonus achates? Which photo Boris Loboda showed you?How rare is it? I collected 12 pieces yesterday and released them, all of them were lost, I should have caught them a month ago or earlier...

Yes, I remember that he showed me something like that, but he didn't respond to my reply message with a clarifying question. However, achates is quite a characteristic beetle. How rare it is I do not know, it depends on the specific region.

23.09.2016 12:08, Liparus

Yes, I remember that he showed me something like that, but he didn't respond to my reply message with a clarifying question. However, achates is quite a characteristic beetle. How rare it is I do not know, it depends on the specific region.

I called Boris and said that the belly of elephants is dotted with very small black dots, on a white-gray background, there are many dots of 70-80 pieces, points of about 0.1 mm...

23.09.2016 12:52, Dmitry Vlasov

This is a lixin with no options. Try to run Ter-Minasyan using the caller ID. I went to mekaspis, and there are a lot of them in Wed. Asia. Like liksusov with a picture like this should not be, but you can also take a look at them just in case. It is quite possible that Ter-Minasyan does not have it, because the determinant is already very outdated...

I'll try to run it again with mecaspis in mind.... About the result unsubscribe

23.09.2016 14:36, Fornax13

I almost turned the Ter-Minasyan determinant inside out yes.gifand the genus and species are not defined weep.gif

It is generally difficult to determine anything smile.giffrom it, but it is Trichocleonus leucophyllus, but very shabby and shabby yes.gif
Likes: 2

23.09.2016 15:17, ejikmurom

can you tell me who settled in yablochki?Almost every apple,every seed, has a maggot in it...

Pictures:
picture: 1.JPG
1.JPG — (39.11к)

picture: 2.JPG
2.JPG — (295.01 k)

23.09.2016 15:48, Fornax13

can you tell me who settled in yablochki?Almost every apple,every seed, has a maggot in it...

it is better to transfer this to the topic for determining larvae. In general, try to withdraw - we'll see. Working hypothesis-Torymus variants: http://www.ipm.msu.edu/insects/apple_seed_chalcid

23.09.2016 17:21, Dmitry Vlasov

It is generally difficult to determine anything smile.giffrom it, but it is Trichocleonus leucophyllus, but very shabby and shabby yes.gif

Who should I write as authors - you are Alexey or BA???

23.09.2016 20:51, Чегар

It is generally difficult to determine anything smile.giffrom it, but it is Trichocleonus leucophyllus, but very shabby and shabby yes.gif

I have such a companion under the name Trichocleonus leucophyllus. Determined here by this photo. https://www.zin.ru/animalia/coleoptera/rus/trileuaa.htm
Kazakhstan Almaty region of Malay Sary17. 04. 2015

Pictures:
picture: ______1.jpg
______1.jpg — (183.82к)

picture: ______2.jpg
______2.jpg — (167.87 k)

23.09.2016 21:32, Mantispid

I have such a companion under the name Trichocleonus leucophyllus. Determined here by this photo. https://www.zin.ru/animalia/coleoptera/rus/trileuaa.htm
Kazakhstan Almaty region of Malay Sary17. 04. 2015

that's right, there are no questions
Likes: 1

23.09.2016 21:49, Чегар

Hurray! Was in doubt.
And here's another case. In a recent report for August, I wrote that among the tenebrio black heifers in Moldova, there is a molitor (frequent) and an obscurus (rare). And T. opacus-but no, I haven't met it. And then I remembered one dubious bug from Ukraine (Ivano-Frankivsk region, Kosyvsky district, Sheshory). Caught in the evening flying, on the outskirts of the village, on one side of a mixed forest, on the other-backyards. At dusk, I immediately took it for Molitor and no doubt flew out of the old Hutsul barn. And recently I decided to take another look and it seems like it turns out the same opacus!
Well, say it's Tenebrio opacus!!

Pictures:
picture: _______1.jpg
_______1.jpg — (144.67к)

picture: _______2.jpg
_______2.jpg — (187.18 k)

24.09.2016 20:05, akulich-sibiria

It is found in cumin from Central Asia.
3 mm. As I understand what kind of leaf beetle. Top in short sloping hairs
picture: DSCN1569.JPG
picture: DSCN1570.JPG
picture: DSCN1571.JPG

This post was edited by akulich-sibiria - 24.09.2016 20: 09

24.09.2016 20:18, Mantispid

It is found in cumin from Central Asia.
3 mm. As I understand what kind of leaf beetle. Top in short sloping hairs

Right. This is eumolpina. I can offer to drive out the definition of Lopatin - " Leaf beetles (Chrysomelidae) Central Asia and Kazakhstan".
Likes: 1

24.09.2016 20:53, akulich-sibiria

Atomyria sarafschanica Solski 1882 jump.gif
published by Lopatin 1986

This post was edited by akulich-sibiria - 24.09.2016 20: 53

24.09.2016 21:17, akulich-sibiria

Krasnoyarsk. 4 mm.
Unfortunately, my camera doesn't perceive anything dark and shiny, but still.
It is similar to Glischrochilus hortensis
, but the punctuation of the elytra disappears much less often towards the top of the tuft, which is why the longitudinal ribs are more distinct. At the base of the seam, the dots form a small field where they are thick, forming a kind of longitudinal wrinkles.
Pronotum points are smaller.
picture: DSCN1575.JPG
picture: DSCN1573.JPG
picture: DSCN1574.JPG
picture: DSCN1576.JPG
picture: DSCN1577.JPG

24.09.2016 21:52, stierlyz

Who should I write as authors - you are Alexey or BA???

As the author of the definition, write the one who personally saw (and preferably under optics) this copy. And a specialist from the forum who threw you a version that was then successfully worked out, you can't write on the label in any way.
Or do you really want to write " Mantispid det. 016 (per Molbiol)"? eek.gif

This post was edited by stierlyz - 24.09.2016 21: 52
Likes: 1

25.09.2016 6:07, Dmitry Vlasov

As the author of the definition, write the one who personally saw (and preferably under optics) this copy. And a specialist from the forum who threw you a version that was then successfully worked out, you can't write on the label in any way.
Or do you really want to write " Mantispid det. 016 (per Molbiol)"? eek.gif

Dear "Maxim Maksimych". if the view can be ACCURATELY determined from the photo, then why not write the author of the definition/confirmation. Ilya, gave the version, and Alexey (Fornax13) - accurately named the beetle, it is quite possible that he showed the photo to B. A. Korotyaev.... So I asked who to write to...

25.09.2016 8:49, akulich-sibiria

Italy Botanical Garden near Viterbo.
6-6. 5 mm.
Thighs of all legs with a small clove. The legs are red with hair-like and broad green scales. Head tube at the base with a slightly noticeable elevation.
picture: DSCN1578.JPG
picture: DSCN1579.JPG
picture: DSCN1580.JPG
picture: DSCN1581.JPG

keyed, similar to Polydrusus (Eudipnus) formosus (Mayer, 1779)

This post was edited by akulich-sibiria - 25.09.2016 08: 56

25.09.2016 9:05, Mantispid

Italy Botanical Garden near Viterbo.
6-6. 5 mm.
Thighs of all legs with a small clove. The legs are red with hair-like and broad green scales. Head tube at the base with a slightly noticeable elevation.
keyed, similar to Polydrusus (Eudipnus) formosus (Mayer, 1779)

the most real formosus and is
Likes: 1

25.09.2016 9:06, Mantispid

Dear "Maxim Maksimych". if the view can be ACCURATELY determined from the photo, then why not write the author of the definition/confirmation. Ilya, gave the version, and Alexey (Fornax13) - accurately named the beetle, it is quite possible that he showed the photo to B. A. Korotyaev.... So I asked who to write to...

hardly BA, he basically does not determine by photo and sends in a rough form all who stick to him with such questions

25.09.2016 10:27, akulich-sibiria

Primorsky Krai. About 5 mm. The body is completely covered with their broad scales and raised hairs. The claws are loose. There are retroorbital lobes. The 1st part of the mustache is almost equal to the second. Maybe something from Cyphicerini?
Type species Ptochidius tesselatus Motschulsky, 1860
picture: DSCN1585.JPG
picture: DSCN1586.JPG
picture: DSCN1588.JPG
picture: DSCN1589.JPG
picture: DSCN1590.JPG
picture: DSCN1591.JPG

This post was edited by akulich-sibiria - 25.09.2016 10: 37

25.09.2016 10:29, akulich-sibiria

Monochamus guttulatus Gress., 1951?
Primorsky Krai
picture: DSCN1584.JPG

25.09.2016 10:32, AGG

Dear "Maxim Maksimych". if the view can be ACCURATELY determined from the photo, then why not write the author of the definition/confirmation. Ilya, gave the version, and Alexey (Fornax13) - accurately named the beetle, it is quite possible that he showed the photo to B. A. Korotyaev.... So I asked who to write to...

I don't know who showed what to whom, but in such cases it's not bad to write "by photo"

25.09.2016 10:39, Tivanik

Help me identify the bug. Saint Petersburg, 6.09.2016

picture: IMGP0689.jpg

25.09.2016 10:40, Mantispid

Primorsky Krai. About 5 mm. The body is completely covered with their broad scales and raised hairs. The claws are loose. There are retroorbital lobes. The 1st part of the mustache is almost equal to the second. Maybe something from Cyphicerini?
Type species Ptochidius tesselatus Motschulsky, 1860

yes tsifitserinka simple, Ptochidius tesselatus Motschulsky, 1860

25.09.2016 13:44, Чегар

The collection of Tenebrio black heifers brought another surprise. Among Tenebrio obscurus, there was a single beetle from southern Kazakhstan (Dzhambul region, Moyinkum pic, 12.07.08 P. A. Yessenbekov), which turned out to be Tenebrio angustus! According to Medvedev, all the signs converged, the photo on Zina is also one in one https://www.zin.ru/animalia/coleoptera/rus/tenangms.htm
The photo shows angustus on the left, and Moldovan obscurus on the right for comparison. It seemed to me that perhaps the most noticeable distinguishing feature is the highly elongated second segment of the antennae in obscurus. This attribute is not included in the identifier. In angustus, the second segment practically does not differ from the rest. Well, a little longer.
Is it really angustus on the left? Or did I do something amateurish to myself?

Pictures:
picture: Angustus.jpg
Angustus.jpg — (103.68к)

25.09.2016 14:38, Slavinator

Name the beetles. Saratov region

Pictures:
picture: ____1.JPG
____1.JPG — (287.7к)

picture: ____2.JPG
____2.JPG — (300.57 k)

25.09.2016 17:37, maik

Good evening, everyone. Tell me what kind of beetle Okr. g. Stavropol in cow cake. 02.04.2014 L-8 mm Onthophagus fracticornis (Preyssler, 1790) or O. similis
picture: DSCF2689.JPG

25.09.2016 17:55, Чегар

Another option is female Onthophagus fissicornis
Likes: 1

25.09.2016 19:09, Dorcus

Hello!
Help us determine whether Primorye is located in the Ussuriysky district. Mid July
Thank you in advance

Pictures:
picture: IMG_7023.JPG
IMG_7023.JPG — (321.92к)

picture: IMG_7027.JPG
IMG_7027.JPG — (308.2к)

picture: IMG_7028.JPG
IMG_7028.JPG — (277.1к)

picture: IMG_7029.JPG
IMG_7029.JPG — (300.82к)

picture: IMG_7030.JPG
IMG_7030.JPG — (279.42к)

picture: IMG_7031.JPG
IMG_7031.JPG — (300.27к)

picture: IMG_7066.JPG
IMG_7066.JPG — (280.66к)

picture: IMG_6977.JPG
IMG_6977.JPG — (300.04к)

25.09.2016 20:23, akulich-sibiria

Chita, Transbaikalia.
fairly large Magdalis with Rosa sp.
5 mm. Elytra with a clear metallic blue tint. The aisles are wide and flat. Pronotum with lateral denticles at the apex. The head tube is slightly larger than the head. Thighs with a powerful prong.
picture: DSCN1593.JPG
picture: DSCN1594.JPG
picture: DSCN1595.JPG
picture: DSCN1596.JPG
picture: DSCN1597.JPG
picture: DSCN1598.JPG

25.09.2016 20:57, Mantispid

Chita, Transbaikalia.
fairly large Magdalis with Rosa sp.
5 mm. Elytra with a clear metallic blue tint. The aisles are wide and flat. Pronotum with lateral denticles at the apex. The head tube is slightly larger than the head. Thighs with a powerful prong.

it is you Odontomagdalis who "played around" with the nominative and this miracle was born to them jump.gif

25.09.2016 22:31, Barnaba

Hello!
Help us determine whether Primorye is located in the Ussuriysky district. Mid July
Thank you in advance

1. Mimela holosericea (Fabricius, 1787)
2. All Mimela testaceipes (Motschulsky, 1860)
3. Cetonia (Eucetonia) magnifica Ballion, 1871
4. Protaetia sp.
5. Gnorimus subopacus Motsch.
6. Gametis jucunda (Faldermann, 1835) beautiful morph
7. Lasiopsis sedakovi Mann. or M. B. L. crenicollis Motsch.
8. Carabus henningi? However, this is not for me wink.gif
Likes: 1

25.09.2016 22:32, Barnaba

Good evening, everyone. Tell me what kind of beetle Okr. g. Stavropol in cow cake. 02.04.2014 L-8 mm Onthophagus fracticornis (Preyssler, 1790) or O. similis

Onthophagus fissicornis.
Likes: 1

25.09.2016 22:46, Aleksandr Safronov

Hello!
Help us determine whether Primorye is located in the Ussuriysky district. Mid July
Thank you in advance

8. Carabus (Megodontus) vietinghoffi bowringi Chaudoir, 1863
Likes: 1

26.09.2016 1:18, Slavinator

Can you tell me? URL #27481

26.09.2016 2:00, smax

Hello!
Help us determine whether Primorye is located in the Ussuriysky district. Mid July
Thank you in advance


IMG_7066.JPG - This is still Holotrichia. It's just that this is interpreted as intermedia, but the group is huge and terrible in the systematic sense that it lives here, it's not really clear until now пор.IMG_7029.JPG
- This is also Cetonia. I want to call it viridiopaca, but I'm not sure. Although the green magnifica is less similar, in my opinion.

This post was edited by smax - 26.09.2016 02: 10
Likes: 2

26.09.2016 2:02, smax

Can you tell me? URL #27481

Lagria and Amara some.

26.09.2016 2:22, smax

Monochamus guttulatus Gress., 1951?
Primorsky Krai


да
Likes: 1

26.09.2016 3:24, akulich-sibiria

it is you Odontomagdalis who "played around" with the nominative and this miracle was born to them jump.gif


And what is this" miracle " called now? You have a similar Magdalis (Odontomagdalis) armigera (Geoffroy, 1785) in the identifier, but it's black, and I have this confused.gif
smile.gif

26.09.2016 8:42, Mantispid

And what is this" miracle " called now? You have a similar Magdalis (Odontomagdalis) armigera (Geoffroy, 1785) in your identifier, but it's black, and I have this one confused.gif
smile.gif

name it something smile.gif
Odontomagdalis are almost all black and long, with blue elytra - this is a nominative subgenus, but they have a pronotum without teeth

Pages: 1 ...683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691... 854

New comment

Note: you should have a Insecta.pro account to upload new topics and comments. Please, create an account or log in to add comments.

* Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages.

Random species of the website catalog

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.