Identification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Good afternoon!
Tell me pozh-ta what kind of view (if possible)
Tatarstan, Nizhnekamsk district, Tavel village district. Summer 2015

This post was edited by Radik - 26.09.2016 14: 53

1. Mimela holosericea (Fabricius, 1787)
2. All Mimela testaceipes (Motschulsky, 1860)
3. Cetonia (Eucetonia) magnifica Ballion, 1871
4. Protaetia sp.
5. Gnorimus subopacus Motsch.
6. Gametis jucunda (Faldermann, 1835) beautiful morph
7. Lasiopsis sedakovi Mann. or M. B. L. crenicollis Motsch.
8. Carabus henningi? However, this is not for me

Thank you very much)!!!

IMG_7066.JPG - This is still Holotrichia. It's just that this is interpreted as intermedia, but the group is huge and terrible in the systematic sense that it lives here, it's not really clear until now пор.IMG_7029.JPG
- This is also Cetonia. I want to call it viridiopaca, but I'm not sure. Although the green magnifica is less similar, in my opinion.

I don't understand these groups at all, but it's definitely more like Holotrichia, I'll figure it out

Thank you for the information)!

Good afternoon!
Tell me pozh-ta what kind of view (if possible)
Tatarstan, Nizhnekamsk district, Tavel village district. Summer 2015

Seems Scotodes annulatus (Eschscholtz, 1818)

To akulich-sibiria & Mantispid

Magdalis (Odontomagdalis) gurjevae Barrios, 1984
Mongolia. Russia is probably the first find, but I don't know for sure.

Hello.
I ask for help in determining.

Armenia, Gekharkuninskaya area, Sevan lake env., 16.06.2014

Although no, not the first - from Primorye it has already been indicated...

Hello.
I ask for help in determining.

Armenia, Gekharkuninskaya area, Sevan lake env., 16.06.2014

This is what is commonly called Potosia caucasica (Kolenati). From the cuprinahieroglyphica group. Perhaps they are really different.

Hello!
Help us determine whether Primorye is located in the Ussuriysky district. Mid July
Thank you in advance

IMG_7029.JPG
A suspicious bug though
I would check it out for Cetonia pilifera Motsch.

This post was edited by smax - 26.09.2016 19: 56

This is what is commonly called Potosia caucasica (Kolenati). From the cuprinahieroglyphica group. Perhaps they are really different.

Very interesting. Maybe someone can tell me about my similar bronzes? I keep looking at them and suffering:

1) Georgia, Tbilisi, city center, 24.07.2016, male 21mm. Top/Bottom:


2) Georgia, Imereti region, oak forest south of Kutaisi, 27.07.2016, M+W, 22-23mm. Top/Bottom:



3) Turkey, prov. Antalya, Kemer, Tekirova, 30.07.2014, M+W, 24-21mm. Top/Bottom:

Good time of day.
I hardly found the time to re-photograph it, unfortunately there is no macro lens. Please help if possible.
Northern Greece, 20 km from Thessaloniki, Mount Hortiatis. 800m, September.
Photo 1

Photo 2

Photo 3

Photo 4


This post was edited by nplion-09/27/2016 11: 24

IMG_7066.JPG - This is still Holotrichia. It's just that this is interpreted as intermedia, but the group is huge and terrible in the systematic sense that it lives here, it's not really clear until now.

Very likely. I haven't seen enough of this band from our DV, more from China and Korea to Vietnam. Although all the Holotrichia I've seen seem to have legs longer than the shins, and look thinner than the specimens. on the photo. But then it is not clear what kind. It seems to be a female, unfortunately, and quite well-lived, the teeth of the front legs are worn out. It is, of course, too bare for lasiopsis; I thought that it was wiped, but now I see a number of other differences (dotted prsp, the position of the spur on the front legs between the 2nd and 3rd prong, etc.). But it does have a frontal keel, albeit a weak one (or so it seems to me?); as I imagine, Holotrichia proper does not have one at all. It is present in the former subgenus Pledina (the species that M. b. in Primorye is now in the genus Miridiba: M. castanea and M. sinensis), but it is much more pronounced; and these species have a fairly smooth prsp and ndcr, with almost no visible edges. Now I looked at the available photos - according to the sculpture of the prsp and ndkr, this copy is closer to the Korean H. parallela (H. intermedia I did not see and there is no photo), but it differs in the following: frontal keel, short legs, serration of the sides of the prsp, a large blade at the top of the hind legs. In addition, I don't see the top spurs on my hind legs in the photo, is this a foreshortening or a disabled person? In general, it is unclear.

It's hard for me to add anything useful. A bug like this (or very similar) I found one, but unfortunately, it turned out to be a female from Kamenushka. That is, I can't even roughly orient myself by the structure of the genitals to which species it tends. Its spurs are similar to those of diomphalia, slightly longer and narrower.

Here are a few more: Primorye, Terneysky district, Maksimovka, July 10-15

Pictures:

IMG_7114.JPG — (278.55к)


IMG_7157.JPG — (268.46к)

Here's another one, Ussuri district, July 10-15

Pictures:

IMG_7152.JPG — (256.14к)


IMG_7150.JPG — (223.41к)


IMG_7148.JPG — (292.74к)


IMG_7117.JPG — (302.64к)


IMG_7075.JPG — (325.74к)


IMG_7113.JPG — (255.18к)


IMG_7156.JPG — (248.78к)

Here are a few more: Primorye, Terneysky district, Maksimovka, July 10-15

IMG_7114.JPG -Carabus (Megodontus) vietinghoffi (if I'm not confusing anything)
IMG_7157.JPG — Phelotrupes auratus

Here's another one, Ussuri district, July 10-15

IMG_7117.JPG — Hoplosternus incanus

IMG_7117.JPG — Hoplosternus incanus

Thank you Denis!)

Here are a few more: Primorye, Terneysky district, Maksimovka, July 10-15

IMG_7114.JPG - Carabus (Morphocarabus) hummeli Fischer, 1823

Here are a few more: Primorye, Terneysky district, Maksimovka, July 10-15

IMG_7157.JPG
Geotrupes koltzei (=amoenus)

Here's another one, Ussuri district, July 10-15

IMG_7152.JPG - Saperda alberti
IMG_7150.JPG - Cyrtoclytus capra
IMG_7148.JPG - Trichoferus campestris
IMG_7075.JPG - Eutetrapha sedecimpunctata
IMG_7113.JPG - Arhopalus , видимо, rusticus
IMG_7156.JPG - Agapanthia daurica

"Banned by wire" Maksim M. sends greetings to everyone and asks to dispel doubts about Cicindela campestris pontica (Russia, Astrakhan region, 01. -05.05.2016, okr. p.Hosheutovo-Dosang,solonchak,Malukhin M. V. Leg.)

Denu direct respect and respect!!!

Denu direct respect and respect!!!

and someone was banned? Maxim, I hope to see you on the first day of the fair

pontica is a relative "thing", it all depends on how someone understands it, accepts it, and the area is my opinion. and the bug is really interesting and beautiful

This post was edited by AGG - 27.09.2016 23: 11

I will be with a box,and neodnoy ...

Pro skakuna-a desertorum it can be-and?

This form is described as a subspecies of campestris, but I accept it no higher than the form C. campestris pontica f. neontica Deuve, 2012. I caught them in the Astrakhan region.

Good afternoon. Tell me the bug.Okr. kh. Top. Yegorlyk pr. bereg R. Yegorlyk 20 km. from Stavropol near horse manure L-20 mm 28.09.2016 detained while trying to escape.

Broscus cephalotes

Hello! Ussuriysky district, end of July

Pictures:

IMG_7179.JPG — (296.38к)


IMG_7195.JPG — (261.9к)


IMG_7242.JPG — (328.42к)

Primorye, Terneysky district

Pictures:

IMG_7198.JPG — (296.13к)


IMG_7213.JPG — (313.62к)


IMG_7234.JPG — (336.4к)

Anisimovka

Pictures:

IMG_7253.JPG — (228.28к)


IMG_7255.JPG — (264.53к)

Hello! Ussuriysky district, end of July

IMG_7195 - Necrodes littoralis
IMG_7186 - Codocera ferruginea

Primorye, Terneysky district

IMG_7256 - Strangalia attenuata

Primorye, Terneysky district

IMG_7234.JPG - Carabus (s. str.) arvensis faldermanni Dejean, 1829

Please forgive me for the quality of the photo, taken on a mobile phone.
Here is a beetle, shiny black, found in a tree fungus in the company of Diaperis boleti. I can't even understand my family. Only three pieces-from 3 to 4 mm.

Pictures:

_____.jpg — (35.38к)

Despite the poor photo, your bug is quite suitable for Cyllodes ater.

second from the top (24.05) - Otiorhynchus raucus, and then I broke open...
Why not post your photos here? However, not in this amount, but more portioned. Yes, and labels with sizes are needed, Western Ukraine is quite diverse, there are mountains there, including the subalpine, you know the altitude zone.

In this case, it is more rational to place links to image files in the tags [img] [/img].

Although it is diverse, all of them were made in several areas: either in the garden, in the vegetable garden, or in the field. If already, then they are all made at one point, namely in the village of Ternopil region. For example, in such a biotope https://pp.vk.me/c626726/v626726846/b672/_mh6u1sdFTU.jpg
One photo would take a long time... Next time I will give them as they are photographed.
Thank you for your help!