E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Identification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Community and ForumInsects identificationIdentification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Pages: 1 ...699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707... 854

27.01.2017 18:42, Chivokus

Please help me. Sort of like Orthotomicus sutularis?????? May 2012, warehouse, timber, Kiev

Pictures:
picture: image0057.jpg
image0057.jpg — (342.88к)

picture: image0055.jpg
image0055.jpg — (335.72к)

picture: IMG_1282.JPG
IMG_1282.JPG — (332.69к)

27.01.2017 18:54, Chivokus

Here's another one. Perhaps Orthotomicus laricis???? May, 2012, timber warehouse, Kiev

Pictures:
picture: image0064.jpg
image0064.jpg — (305.71к)

picture: image0068.jpg
image0068.jpg — (330.72к)

picture: image0070.jpg
image0070.jpg — (279.91к)

picture: image0084.jpg
image0084.jpg — (320.42к)

picture: image0087.jpg
image0087.jpg — (293.68к)

27.01.2017 21:12, akulich-sibiria

The upper one I think is yes suturalis
but the second one, I distinguish females of proximus from laricis by the forehead mainly. Do laricis have a matte finish with clear grains? at proximus, it is clearly brilliant. But these bumps between the lower and second teeth are characteristic of laricis. Well, look at the lower edge of the car's hollow, like it's not wavy

27.01.2017 21:56, NakaRB

196 if it is small up to 3 mm, it resembles Hylastes opacus, I would like to know what conifers are still there.

It seems to me that it is slightly larger than 3 mm. From coniferous trees around-spruce and pine (if in the forest), well, on the sites of all sorts of junipers, larch, thuja...

27.01.2017 22:14, NakaRB

201-204-Moscow, Bitsevsky forest
Park 205-210-D. New items-Begichevo, Serpukhov district, Moscow region.


201. 22.02.2016, forest floor
user posted image

202. 04.10.2015
user posted image

203. 04.10.2015
user posted image

204. 04.10.2015
user posted image
user posted image

205. 02.08.2015
user posted image

206. 26.07.2015
user posted image

207. 24.05.2015
user posted image

208. 08.05.2015
user posted image

209. 08.05.2015
user posted image

210. 07.05.2015
user posted image

27.01.2017 22:48, Александрс

Help identify Tenebrionidae. S Tajikistan, Khazratisho Mts., niar Lijaki vill., h=2020m, 14.5 mm. 2015-06-17 Thank you!

This post was edited by Alexandrs - 28.01.2017 04: 09

Pictures:
picture: 046.jpg
046.jpg — (166.1к)

28.01.2017 9:57, akulich-sibiria

It seems to me that it is slightly larger than 3 mm. From coniferous trees around-spruce and pine (if in the forest), well, on the sites of all sorts of junipers, larch, thuja...


we have opacus on scots pine,but on spruce there is a similar species H. cunicularius here you need to look at the beetle's face smile.gif

28.01.2017 15:52, Александрс

Can anyone identify the Dermestidae from the anthill? E Azerbaijan, Absheron Peninsula, near Gobustan vill., h=120m, 40°29'58.22" N 49°27'54.10" E. 2015-04-15. 1,4мм. Thanks!

This post was edited by Alexandrs - 28.01.2017 15: 53

Pictures:
picture: 233a_2.jpg
233a_2.jpg — (129.88к)

28.01.2017 15:57, Bad Den

Can anyone identify the Dermestidae from the anthill? E Azerbaijan, Absheron Peninsula, near Gobustan vill., h=120m, 40°29'58.22" N 49°27'54.10" E. 2015-04-15. 1,4мм. Thanks!

Thorictus sp.
Likes: 1

29.01.2017 14:50, Woodmen

Surroundings of Kirovo-Chepetsk, Kirov region. 12.06.2016.
Labidostomis humeralis or Labidostomis lucida? Or you can't tell for sure from this picture?

user posted image

30.01.2017 0:47, Victor Titov

Surroundings of Kirovo-Chepetsk, Kirov region. 12.06.2016.
Labidostomis humeralis or Labidostomis lucida? Or you can't tell for sure from this picture?

I would assume a female Labidostomis longimana. But identifying these fellow photographers is a thankless task.
Likes: 1

30.01.2017 10:40, Chivokus

The upper one I think is yes suturalis
but the second one, I distinguish females of proximus from laricis by the forehead mainly. Do laricis have a matte finish with clear grains? at proximus, it is clearly brilliant. But these bumps between the lower and second teeth are characteristic of laricis. Well, look at the lower edge of the car's hollow, it doesn't seem to be wavy

Thanks!!! Here is another photo of the forehead and the lower edge of the depression

Pictures:
picture: image0080.jpg
image0080.jpg — (343.98к)

picture: image0083.jpg
image0083.jpg — (300.02к)

picture: image0085.jpg
image0085.jpg — (309.24к)

31.01.2017 5:48, akulich-sibiria

Thanks!!! Here is another photo of the forehead and the lower edge of the depression


I think that yes, it is, so maybe my photos will help. wink.gif There are typos in the numbers, but I think you'll figure it out ))
picture: O._laricis.jpg
picture: O._proximus______.jpg

This post was edited by akulich-sibiria - 31.01.2017 05: 51
Likes: 1

31.01.2017 6:58, akulich-sibiria

these two types regularly cause difficulties for me, especially when you catch individual specimens. Sometimes it seems that everything is clear, and sometimes you have to start all over again: -)
Likes: 1

31.01.2017 10:46, Chivokus

these two types regularly cause difficulties for me, especially when you catch individual specimens. Sometimes it seems that everything is clear, and sometimes you have to start all over again :-)

I still have a lot of instances that were identified one at a time immediately after catching, but now I'm reviewing them and I understand that most likely there are errors, everything is mixed up. My head is a mess. I ponagleyu and ask to see a few more individuals))) THANK YOU FOR THE VISUAL EXAMPLE WITH THE ARROWS. VERY GOOD AND ACCESSIBLE INFORMATION. Would you be able to throw off the other bark beetles from your presentation? Or, maybe, in the personal account aduls@ukr.net ? Just do not consider it impudent)))

O. erosus male???

Pictures:
picture: IMG_1162.JPG
IMG_1162.JPG — (271.35к)

picture: IMG_1174.JPG
IMG_1174.JPG — (334.96к)

picture: IMG_1177.JPG
IMG_1177.JPG — (316.33к)

picture: IMG_1180.JPG
IMG_1180.JPG — (301.31к)

picture: IMG_1182.JPG
IMG_1182.JPG — (273.79к)

picture: IMG_1184.JPG
IMG_1184.JPG — (297.71к)

picture: IMG_1186.JPG
IMG_1186.JPG — (345.51к)

31.01.2017 10:50, akulich-sibiria

well, as you can see, this is just O. proximus and as I understand it, the male has like 4 teeth? )))
In fact, I have already shown all the slides here ))))) And the back edge of the wheelbarrow is wavy and the forehead is shiny with dots!
Likes: 1

31.01.2017 11:22, Chivokus

well, as you can see, this is just O. proximus and as I understand it, the male has like 4 teeth? )))
In fact, I have already shown all the slides here ))))) And the back edge of the wheelbarrow is wavy and the forehead is shiny with dots!

And this one?

Pictures:
picture: IMG_1132.JPG
IMG_1132.JPG — (338.27к)

picture: IMG_1138.JPG
IMG_1138.JPG — (331.09к)

picture: IMG_1140.JPG
IMG_1140.JPG — (302.58к)

picture: IMG_1152.JPG
IMG_1152.JPG — (337.63к)

31.01.2017 12:15, akulich-sibiria

smaller in size? it seems to me that this is generally O. suturalis male. The grooves on the elytra are not so clear, very shiny. It is necessary to take a photo from the front of the forehead, often they hide their head in the pronotum, then the dotted forehead does not work. The ratio of length between the 1st teeth and between the 1st and 2nd of each side is important.
Likes: 1

31.01.2017 12:18, akulich-sibiria

well, that's just the 3rd picture )))
And look, the dots on the very surface of the wheelbarrow are poorly visible, not as clear as in the first two types.

Pictures:
picture: O._suturalis______.jpg
O._suturalis______.jpg — (303.33к)

Likes: 1

31.01.2017 15:32, Chivokus

smaller in size? it seems to me that this is generally O. suturalis male. The grooves on the elytra are not so clear, very shiny. It is necessary to take a photo from the front of the forehead, often they hide their head in the pronotum, then the dotted forehead does not work. The ratio of length between the 1st teeth and between the 1st and 2nd of each side is important.


And O. erosus should have a forehead, can you tell me? I can't find it in the literature...

The size of the presumed O. suturalis is 3.7 mm. Here is a photo of the forehead

Pictures:
picture: image0114.jpg
image0114.jpg — (348.14 k)

31.01.2017 19:57, akulich-sibiria

well, this species does not live here, I can't tell you anything about it. I think that even without the surface of the forehead there are signs. I know that it is very similar to proximus and the differences in the distance between the teeth, as well as the shape and orientation of the second tooth.
Likes: 1

31.01.2017 20:00, akulich-sibiria

By the way, the specimen that you called O. erosus and I called O. proximus is a male (photos 62 and 74). you may be right. I looked at my own, it's too painful in your picture to have a wide base at the second prong.

This post was edited by akulich-sibiria - 31.01.2017 20: 01
Likes: 1

02.02.2017 10:42, Woodmen

Surroundings of Kirovo-Chepetsk, Kirov region. June 15.

user posted image user posted image

02.02.2017 11:25, scarit

Surroundings of Kirovo-Chepetsk, Kirov region. June 15.

user posted image user posted image

Dolichosoma lineare Rossi (Dasytidae)
Likes: 1

03.02.2017 10:49, Chivokus

Please help me identify it. Like Lixus, but that's what it is....

Pictures:
picture: image0094.jpg
image0094.jpg — (287.77к)

picture: image0097.jpg
image0097.jpg — (302.89к)

picture: image0106.jpg
image0106.jpg — (336.05к)

picture: image0111.jpg
image0111.jpg — (302.8к)

picture: image0113.jpg
image0113.jpg — (284.15к)

picture: image0100.jpg
image0100.jpg — (104.97к)

picture: image0099.jpg
image0099.jpg — (296.54к)

picture: image0093.jpg
image0093.jpg — (326.76к)

03.02.2017 12:48, Mantispid

Please help me identify it. Like Lixus, but that's what it is....

from where? on subtilis does not pull?
Likes: 1

03.02.2017 13:42, Chivokus

from where? on subtilis does not pull?

Got caught in the stock products inanimate. Polesie of Ukraine.
Yes, first of all, Lixus subtilis came to mind, but I was confused by the fact that the pronotum usually shows a longitudinal keel, this is not mentioned in the literature. Well, most likely a visual deception and this is really Lixus subtilis. thank you!!!

This post was edited by Chivokus - 03.02.2017 13: 46

Pictures:
picture: image0091.jpg
image0091.jpg — (178.48к)

03.02.2017 17:49, Mantispid

Got caught in the stock products inanimate. Polesie of Ukraine.
Yes, first of all, Lixus subtilis came to mind, but I was confused by the fact that the pronotum usually shows a longitudinal keel, this is not mentioned in the literature. Well, most likely a visual deception and this is really Lixus subtilis. thank you!!!

well, for example, in this picture of the subtilis, you can also see something like a keel
http://barry.exp-host.ru/gallery/files/07/CRW_8392.jpg
so this is quite normal
Likes: 1

05.02.2017 21:54, Woodmen

Surroundings of Kirovo-Chepetsk, Kirov region. June 15.
Is it possible to distinguish Cantharis obscura paradoxa?

user posted image user posted image user posted image user posted image

user posted image

06.02.2017 2:53, John-ST

Surroundings of Kirovo-Chepetsk, Kirov region. June 15.
Is it possible to distinguish Cantharis obscura paradoxa?


This is Cantharis obscura.
In paradoxa, the anterior edge of the pronotum is rounded, while in obscura it is straight.
Likes: 1

07.02.2017 13:43, Radik

Please tell me this Cerocoma schaefferi (Linnaeus, 1758)
Tatarstan, Nizhnekamsk district, village's ROC. Troitsky. 2015-07-9

07.02.2017 14:50, Mantispid

Please tell me this Cerocoma schaefferi (Linnaeus, 1758)
Tatarstan, Nizhnekamsk district, village's ROC. Troitsky. 2015-07-9

need to see belly

07.02.2017 16:37, Radik

I see, thank you.
And this is Platycerus caraboides (Linnaeus, 1758)
Tatarstan, Nizhnekamsk district, village of Tavel

07.02.2017 20:34, Victor Titov

I see, thank you.
And this is Platycerus caraboides (Linnaeus, 1758)
Tatarstan, Nizhnekamsk district, Tavel village

The picture shows a female - it is hardly possible to say 100% which of the two: ?caprea,? caraboides... However, when fishing in pairs (when mating), it was found that bronze and red legs are female caraboides. But not all of them are like that.

This post was edited by Dmitrich - 07.02.2017 20: 37

08.02.2017 8:04, Radik

The picture shows a female - it is hardly possible to say 100% which of the two: ?caprea,? caraboides... However, when fishing in pairs (when mating), it was found that bronze and red legs are female caraboides. But not all of them are like that.

So you need a photo of the genitals, or a photo of the back of the beetle will help?

08.02.2017 11:35, Woodmen

Surroundings of Kirovo-Chepetsk, Kirov region. June 15.
On Bistorta major (Polygonaceae).

user posted image

08.02.2017 12:19, Mantispid

Surroundings of Kirovo-Chepetsk, Kirov region. June 15.
On Bistorta major (Polygonaceae).

user posted image

Lixus bardanae
Likes: 1

08.02.2017 12:20, Mantispid

So you need a photo of the genitals, or a photo of the back of the beetle will help?

https://www.zin.ru/Animalia/Coleoptera/rus/platyce2.htm

08.02.2017 12:36, Radik

  https://www.zin.ru/Animalia/Coleoptera/rus/platyce2.htm

Thank you very much! I will try.

08.02.2017 12:39, Radik

I understand that Apionidae is useless to determine from the photo, but suddenly.
Tatarstan, Nizhnekamsk district, Tavel village. May 7, 2016

And more. Isn't that a nutty pipe cake?

Pages: 1 ...699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707... 854

New comment

Note: you should have a Insecta.pro account to upload new topics and comments. Please, create an account or log in to add comments.

* Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages.

Random species of the website catalog

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.